Last visit was: 17 Jul 2024, 05:34 It is currently 17 Jul 2024, 05:34
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

The proportion of manufacturing companies in Alameda that use microele

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94371
Own Kudos [?]: 641617 [41]
Given Kudos: 85627
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 85
Own Kudos [?]: 110 [7]
Given Kudos: 105
General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Posts: 241
Own Kudos [?]: 123 [0]
Given Kudos: 50
Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2018
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 27 [1]
Given Kudos: 106
Location: United States (AZ)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
GMAT 3: 720 Q50 V37
Re: The proportion of manufacturing companies in Alameda that use microele [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Option E looks correct for me.

(A) Many products that contain microelectronic components are now assembled completely by machine. (This will lead to more unemployment)

(B) Workers involved in the various aspects of the manufacturing processes that use microelectronic technology need extensive training. (Extensive training doesn't help much with the unemployment case or new job positions)

(C) It is difficult to evaluate numerically what impact on job security the introduction of microelectronics in the workplace had before 1979. (Numerical evaluation of the introduction of microelectronics on job security!!! Naah..)

(D) In 1990 over 90 percent of the jobs in Alameda's manufacturing companies were filled by workers who moved to Alameda because they had skills for which there was no demand in Alameda prior to the introduction of microelectronics there. (Doesn't impact much)

(E) Many workers who have retired from the manufacturing industry in Alameda since 1979 have not been replaced by younger workers. (Keep)
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Posts: 325
Own Kudos [?]: 20633 [0]
Given Kudos: 51
Re: The proportion of manufacturing companies in Alameda that use microele [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
The proportion of manufacturing companies in Alameda that use microelectronics in their manufacturing processes increased from 6 percent in 1979 to 66 percent in 1990. Many labor leaders say that the introduction of microelectronics is the principal cause of the great increase in unemployment during that period in Alameda. In actual fact, however, most of the job losses were due to organizational changes. Moreover, according to new figures released by the labor department, there were many more people employed in Alameda in the manufacturing industry in 1990 than in 1979.

Which of the following, if true, best reconciles the discrepancy between the increase in unemployment and the increase in jobs in the manufacturing industry of Alameda?

(A) Many products that contain microelectronic components are now assembled completely by machine.
(B) Workers involved in the various aspects of the manufacturing processes that use microelectronic technology need extensive training.
(C) It is difficult to evaluate numerically what impact on job security the introduction of microelectronics in the workplace had before 1979.
(D) In 1990 over 90 percent of the jobs in Alameda’s manufacturing companies were filled by workers who moved to Alameda because they had skills for which there was no demand in Alameda prior to the introduction of microelectronics there.
(E) Many workers who have retired from the manufacturing industry in Alameda since 1979 have not been replaced by younger workers.

CR98461.01

Official Explanation

Argument Construction

Which one of the five answer choices given best reconciles the increase in unemployment with the increase in manufacturing employment?

In Alameda, the use of microelectronics in manufacturing increased elevenfold within 11 years. Unemployment in Alameda increased during that period but—contrary to what labor leaders argue—most of the job losses were due to organizational changes. According to the latest official statistics, many more people were employed in manufacturing in Alameda at the end of that period.

One idea to consider is whether manufacturing that involves use of microelectronics in equipment requires employees with a different mix of skills from those traditionally used by employees carrying out manual tasks associated with manufacturing.

A. This choice provides an example of automated manufacturing, but the given information does not specifically mention manufactured products that contain microelectronic components.

B. The given information tells us that the increased unemployment was due to organizational changes. But the additional information here is not a sufficient basis for attributing the increase in unemployment to gaps in training.

C. This simply suggests that there may be some inaccurate data underlying claims about employment trends in manufacturing in Alameda prior to 1979. But the question concerns trends from 1979 to 1990.

D. Correct. This suggests that an influx of new workers to Alameda with the new skills needed in manufacturing may in fact have displaced other employees. These people may still live in Alameda yet be jobless.

E. This information is not sufficient to reconcile the increase in unemployment among those previously employed in manufacturing with the increase in total manufacturing jobs. Retirement of employees from certain types of occupations does not increase unemployment in those occupations.

UNC Kenan Flagler Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 237
Own Kudos [?]: 252 [0]
Given Kudos: 120
GMAT 1: 530 Q43 V20
WE:Analyst (Consumer Products)
Re: The proportion of manufacturing companies in Alameda that use microele [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
The proportion of manufacturing companies in Alameda that use microelectronics in their manufacturing processes increased from 6 percent in 1979 to 66 percent in 1990. Many labor leaders say that the introduction of microelectronics is the principal cause of the great increase in unemployment during that period in Alameda. In actual fact, however, most of the job losses were due to organizational changes. Moreover, according to new figures released by the labor department, there were many more people employed in Alameda in the manufacturing industry in 1990 than in 1979.

Which of the following, if true, best reconciles the discrepancy between the increase in unemployment and the increase in jobs in the manufacturing industry of Alameda?

CR98461.01

Question Type: Resolve the Paradox | Time Taken: 1 min 56 sec

Let's consolidate the data provided in the question w.r.t manufacturing industry for the period between 1979 and 1990
1. Adoption of microelectronics: Increased from 6% to 66%
2. Labor leaders - This adoption caused increase in unemployment in the city
3. Author - It was organizational changes and not this adoption that caused the unemployment
4. Actual data cites that number of people employed in '79 > number of people employed in '90

We are asked to solve the paradox between point 2 and point 4 from the summary above. And in order to do that, we will ask the question that does this option tell us why the number of employees increase in the city?

(D) In 1990 over 90 percent of the jobs in Alameda’s manufacturing companies were filled by workers who moved to Alameda because they had skills for which there was no demand in Alameda prior to the introduction of microelectronics there
This option addresses both the points i.e. 2 and 4
a. It provides insight into the increase in the number of employees by citing that these employees came from outside the city
b. It provides insight into the increase in unemployment that the lack of skills of employees within the city lead to the unemployment, requiring companies to hire from outside the city

(A) Many products that contain microelectronic components are now assembled completely by machine
Does the fact that products are now assembled by machine answer our question? No
(B) Workers involved in the various aspects of the manufacturing processes that use microelectronic technology need extensive training
(C) It is difficult to evaluate numerically what impact on job security the introduction of microelectronics in the workplace had before 1979
Does the challenge to evaluate answer our question? No
(E) Many workers who have retired from the manufacturing industry in Alameda since 1979 have not been replaced by younger workers

Ans. D
Manager
Joined: 18 Apr 2022
Posts: 113
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 704
Location: United States
The proportion of manufacturing companies in Alameda that use microele [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
The proportion of manufacturing companies in Alameda that use microelectronics in their manufacturing processes increased from 6 percent in 1979 to 66 percent in 1990. Many labor leaders say that the introduction of microelectronics is the principal cause of the great increase in unemployment during that period in Alameda. In actual fact, however, most of the job losses were due to organizational changes. Moreover, according to new figures released by the labor department, there were many more people employed in Alameda in the manufacturing industry in 1990 than in 1979.

Which of the following, if true, best reconciles the discrepancy between the increase in unemployment and the increase in jobs in the manufacturing industry of Alameda?

I was between (A) and (D) - and eventually chose (D) without fully understanding why. I could eliminate (A) because it only explains the first part of the conclusion (i.e., the increase in unemployment). After giving some thought, I now understand why (D) is undoubtedly the correct answer.

(D) says that new people filled in new jobs post-introduction of microelectronics. Now, let's put on a logical/reality hat on. When a new product is introduced, usually 2 things happen 1) new jobs open given change in production and 2) old jobs get replaced by new jobs. Therefore, you need to make an inference that these new people NOT ONLY won new job openings vs. the existing residents, BUT ALSO replaced some of the old jobs that these residents held. Therefore, this answer perfectly explains the discrepancy.

(A) Many products that contain microelectronic components are now assembled completely by machine.
(B) Workers involved in the various aspects of the manufacturing processes that use microelectronic technology need extensive training.
(C) It is difficult to evaluate numerically what impact on job security the introduction of microelectronics in the workplace had before 1979.
(D) In 1990 over 90 percent of the jobs in Alameda’s manufacturing companies were filled by workers who moved to Alameda because they had skills for which there was no demand in Alameda prior to the introduction of microelectronics there.
(E) Many workers who have retired from the manufacturing industry in Alameda since 1979 have not been replaced by younger workers.

CR98461.01
Intern
Joined: 17 Aug 2021
Posts: 41
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 300
Re: The proportion of manufacturing companies in Alameda that use microele [#permalink]
souvikgmat1990 wrote:
Option E looks correct for me.

(A) Many products that contain microelectronic components are now assembled completely by machine. (This will lead to more unemployment)

(B) Workers involved in the various aspects of the manufacturing processes that use microelectronic technology need extensive training. (Extensive training doesn't help much with the unemployment case or new job positions)

(C) It is difficult to evaluate numerically what impact on job security the introduction of microelectronics in the workplace had before 1979. (Numerical evaluation of the introduction of microelectronics on job security!!! Naah..)

(D) In 1990 over 90 percent of the jobs in Alameda's manufacturing companies were filled by workers who moved to Alameda because they had skills for which there was no demand in Alameda prior to the introduction of microelectronics there. (Doesn't impact much)

(E) Many workers who have retired from the manufacturing industry in Alameda since 1979 have not been replaced by younger workers. (Keep)

E is tempting, but it doesn't explain the spike in 1990. In fact, it sort of goes against it. Hopefully, this helps.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17501
Own Kudos [?]: 868 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: The proportion of manufacturing companies in Alameda that use microele [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: The proportion of manufacturing companies in Alameda that use microele [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6984 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts