Hi ria99,Good news: you absolutely
can use the LCM of the denominators here. In fact, two posters in this thread already did exactly that (hsingh3031 used 91A and 91B; coylahood multiplied the alligation through by
91). So your instinct isn't wrong - let me show where it fits in.
First set up the milk equation, the same one gracie and sasyaharry wrote:
- Milk from A =
8/13 · a- Milk from B =
5/7 · b- Total milk wanted =
9/13 · (a+b)So:
8a/13 + 5b/7 = 9(a+b)/13.
Now bring in your LCM idea. The LCM of
13 and
7 is
91. Multiply every term by
91 to clear all fractions:
- 8a/13 · 91 =
56a- 5b/7 · 91 =
65b- 9(a+b)/13 · 91 =
63(a+b)That gives 56a + 65b = 63a + 63b →
2b = 7a →
a/b = 2/7. Answer
A. So LCM didn't fail you - it's just the clearing-denominators step, used
after you write the equation.
Why "just assume a number" feels stuck hereAssuming a convenient number is great when the unknown is some property
inside one fixed mixture. But here the thing being asked
is the ratio in which you combine A and B - that ratio (a : b) is the unknown itself. You can't assume it; you have to solve for it. So you keep a and b as unknowns, write the milk balance, and let the algebra (cleared by the LCM
91) hand you a : b.
Quick way to feel the difference:
-
"Vessel A is 8:5 milk:water - what fraction is milk?" → here you can assume
13 liters and read off
8/13 instantly.
-
"In what ratio do I mix A and B to hit 9:4?" → the ratio is the answer, so assuming it would beg the question.
Bottom line: set up the equation, then use your LCM trick to clear fractions - both methods you mentioned are valid, just used at the right moment.
Answer: A