Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
There's always a better way." This critical mantra can save clever students untold struggle on the GMAT Quantitative section. Let's examine some challenging questions that reward students who possess the mental flexibility to shift perspective.
Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? e-GMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days.
A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 14 Nov 2013, 07:14
1
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
55% (hard)
Question Stats:
61% (01:58) correct 39% (02:24) wrong based on 95 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two smaller rectangular pieces. The shorter piece was one-third the length of the longer of the 2 new pieces and had an area of 12 square feet. What was the length in feet of the original piece of cloth before cutting?
Could you translate this task into human language? The task is simple, but wording is terrible.
A rectangular piece 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two pieces. This means the width of the two pieces is still 2 feet each. The total length has got split into two parts. The smaller part has area 12 sq feet so its length must be 6 feet. Since this is 1/3rd of the length of the bigger piece, the length of the bigger piece must be 3 * 6 = 18 feet. Hence total original length must be 6 + 18 = 24 feet.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Second sentence is terrible, how could it be "the shorter part......" if there is a rectangle cut lengthwise, so both parts must have the same length.
_________________
Could you translate this task into human language? The task is simple, but wording is terrible.
A rectangular piece 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two pieces. This means the width of the two pieces is still 2 feet each. The total length has got split into two parts. The smaller part has area 12 sq feet so its length must be 6 feet. Since this is 1/3rd of the length of the bigger piece, the length of the bigger piece must be 3 * 6 = 18 feet. Hence total original length must be 6 + 18 = 24 feet.
Don't you mean that since L/3 = 6, therefore total length, L = 18?
Don't you mean that since L/3 = 6, therefore total length, L = 18?
Consider this: The question says, "Length of shorter piece is 1/3rd the length of longer of the two new pieces" This means after I split it into two pieces, I have a shorter piece and a longer one. The length of shorter is 1/3rd the length of longer. The 6 I found out was length of shorter piece. Then length of longer should be 18 and total length should be 24.
Had it been the other way, the questions would have said "The length of shorter piece is 1/3rd the total length."
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Don't you mean that since L/3 = 6, therefore total length, L = 18?
Consider this: The question says, "Length of shorter piece is 1/3rd the length of longer of the two new pieces" This means after I split it into two pieces, I have a shorter piece and a longer one. The length of shorter is 1/3rd the length of longer. The 6 I found out was length of shorter piece. Then length of longer should be 18 and total length should be 24.
Had it been the other way, the questions would have said "The length of shorter piece is 1/3rd the total length."
Thanks for the explanation Karishma. I misunderstood the language of the question. My apologies!!
I agree with @ VeritasPrepKarishma. I got 24 too. I've learnt one thing from NOVA GMAT Prep book. For any hard problems, always remove answer choices which are result of elementary operation( like +,-,/ and*) on numbers mentioned in the question. It won't be a hard problem if answer can be reached using simple elementary operations.
(L/3)*2=12 => L=18 So we can remove B option.
VeritasPrepKarishma explained the solution correctly.
_________________
Firstly, understand that length "shorter piece=1/3*longer piece". Therefore if shorter piece is say 'x' then longer piece is '3x'. Total length is x+3x=4x. Answer must be a multiple of 4. So, answer choices A and B are eliminated. Secondly he says that area of shorter piece is 12. Shorter piece represents 1/4 of total length. Now start with option C. Length of shorter piece=24/4=6. So, area of shorter piece is 2(given width)*6=12. This matches with the info given in the question and hence C. Is the answer.
A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Apr 2020, 07:22
Financier wrote:
A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two smaller rectangular pieces. The shorter piece was one-third the length of the longer of the 2 new pieces and had an area of 12 square feet. What was the length in feet of the original piece of cloth before cutting?
A. 6 B. 18 C. 24 D. 36 E. 48
Since the shorter piece has an area of 12 square feet and a width of 2 feet, its length is 12/2 = 6 feet. Furthermore, since this is 1/3 of the length of the longer piece, the longer piece has a length of 6 x 3 = 18 feet. Therefore, the original piece of cloth has a total length of 6 + 18 = 24 feet.
close
61% (01:58) correct 
