NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 08:39 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 08:39
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Financier
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 230
Own Kudos [?]: 656 [6]
Given Kudos: 194
Schools:Chicago Booth Class of 2013
Send PM
Reviews Badge
A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 14 Nov 2013, 08:14
1
Kudos
5
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (01:54) correct 35% (02:14) wrong based on 220 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two smaller rectangular pieces. The shorter piece was one-third the length of the longer of the 2 new pieces and had an area of 12 square feet. What was the length in feet of the original piece of cloth before cutting?

A. 6
B. 18
C. 24
D. 36
E. 48


ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C

Originally posted by Financier on 21 Nov 2010, 00:47.
Last edited by Bunuel on 14 Nov 2013, 08:14, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic, edited the question and added the OA.
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
L
KarishmaB
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14830
Own Kudos [?]: 64934 [5]
Given Kudos: 427
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Wording / Geometry [#permalink] New post   22 Nov 2010, 19:14
4
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Financier wrote:
Guys,

Could you translate this task into human language?
The task is simple, but wording is terrible.



A rectangular piece 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two pieces. This means the width of the two pieces is still 2 feet each. The total length has got split into two parts. The smaller part has area 12 sq feet so its length must be 6 feet. Since this is 1/3rd of the length of the bigger piece, the length of the bigger piece must be 3 * 6 = 18 feet.
Hence total original length must be 6 + 18 = 24 feet.
General Discussion
User avatar
PTK
VP
VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Status:mission completed!
Posts: 1139
Own Kudos [?]: 2129 [2]
Given Kudos: 622
GPA: 3.77
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Wording / Geometry [#permalink] New post   21 Nov 2010, 01:03
2
Kudos
Second sentence is terrible, how could it be "the shorter part......" if there is a rectangle cut lengthwise, so both parts must have the same length.
User avatar
S
aim730
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Posts: 169
Own Kudos [?]: 67 [0]
Given Kudos: 66
Concentration: Tuck,Cornell,Duke
 Q47  V20 GMAT 2: 560  Q45  V22
WE 1: 4.6 years Exp IT prof
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Wording / Geometry [#permalink] New post   22 Nov 2010, 14:25
answer should be 36
the rectangular cut lengthwise here suggests that the length is divided and the breadth remains the same
User avatar
chaoswithin
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 20 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Booth '14 (D) Stern '14 (A) Sloan '14 (S) CBS '14 (D) Johnson '14 (I)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.29
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Wording / Geometry [#permalink] New post   22 Nov 2010, 16:24
amneetpadda wrote:
answer should be 36
the rectangular cut lengthwise here suggests that the length is divided and the breadth remains the same


I'm getting an answer = 24.

Given: original rect has dimensions 2 by L

Its not cut so there is two smaller rect. with one being bigger than the other.

so dimensions are:

rect_big = 2 by L_b
rect_small = 2 by (1/3) L_b

A_small = 12. therefore L_b = 18.

so L = L_b + (1/3) L_b = (4/3) L_b = 24.
User avatar
Werewolf
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 61
Own Kudos [?]: 34 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Wording / Geometry [#permalink] New post   23 Nov 2010, 21:55
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Financier wrote:
Guys,

Could you translate this task into human language?
The task is simple, but wording is terrible.



A rectangular piece 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two pieces. This means the width of the two pieces is still 2 feet each. The total length has got split into two parts. The smaller part has area 12 sq feet so its length must be 6 feet. Since this is 1/3rd of the length of the bigger piece, the length of the bigger piece must be 3 * 6 = 18 feet.
Hence total original length must be 6 + 18 = 24 feet.



Don't you mean that since L/3 = 6, therefore total length, L = 18?
User avatar
puneetpratik
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
 Q47 GMAT 2: 700  Q49  V35
Send PM
Re: Wording / Geometry [#permalink] New post   23 Nov 2010, 22:11
good one, getting pass the awkward wording is the butt of the question. calc are very simple.
User avatar
L
KarishmaB
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14830
Own Kudos [?]: 64934 [0]
Given Kudos: 427
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Wording / Geometry [#permalink] New post   24 Nov 2010, 05:43
Expert Reply
Werewolf wrote:

Don't you mean that since L/3 = 6, therefore total length, L = 18?


Consider this:
The question says, "Length of shorter piece is 1/3rd the length of longer of the two new pieces"
This means after I split it into two pieces, I have a shorter piece and a longer one. The length of shorter is 1/3rd the length of longer. The 6 I found out was length of shorter piece. Then length of longer should be 18 and total length should be 24.

Had it been the other way, the questions would have said "The length of shorter piece is 1/3rd the total length."
User avatar
Werewolf
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 61
Own Kudos [?]: 34 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Wording / Geometry [#permalink] New post   24 Nov 2010, 08:38
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Werewolf wrote:

Don't you mean that since L/3 = 6, therefore total length, L = 18?


Consider this:
The question says, "Length of shorter piece is 1/3rd the length of longer of the two new pieces"
This means after I split it into two pieces, I have a shorter piece and a longer one. The length of shorter is 1/3rd the length of longer. The 6 I found out was length of shorter piece. Then length of longer should be 18 and total length should be 24.

Had it been the other way, the questions would have said "The length of shorter piece is 1/3rd the total length."



Thanks for the explanation Karishma. I misunderstood the language of the question. My apologies!!
User avatar
rg1
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 May 2010
Posts: 279
Own Kudos [?]: 88 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: CBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V25
GMAT 2: 560 Q47 V20
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V25
GMAT 4: 680 Q49 V34
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Wording / Geometry [#permalink] New post   24 Nov 2010, 08:51
I agree with @ VeritasPrepKarishma.
I got 24 too. I've learnt one thing from NOVA GMAT Prep book. For any hard problems, always remove answer choices which are result of elementary operation( like +,-,/ and*) on numbers mentioned in the question. It won't be a hard problem if answer can be reached using simple elementary operations.

(L/3)*2=12
=> L=18
So we can remove B option.

VeritasPrepKarishma explained the solution correctly.
avatar
madn800
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 May 2013
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 60 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Wording / Geometry [#permalink] New post   14 Nov 2013, 05:31
Firstly, understand that length "shorter piece=1/3*longer piece". Therefore if shorter piece is say 'x' then longer piece is '3x'. Total length is x+3x=4x. Answer must be a multiple of 4. So, answer choices A and B are eliminated. Secondly he says that area of shorter piece is 12. Shorter piece represents 1/4 of total length. Now start with option C. Length of shorter piece=24/4=6. So, area of shorter piece is 2(given width)*6=12. This matches with the info given in the question and hence C. Is the answer.
User avatar
L
ScottTargetTestPrep
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18761
Own Kudos [?]: 22056 [0]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise [#permalink] New post   03 Apr 2020, 08:22
Expert Reply
Financier wrote:
A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two smaller rectangular pieces. The shorter piece was one-third the length of the longer of the 2 new pieces and had an area of 12 square feet. What was the length in feet of the original piece of cloth before cutting?

A. 6
B. 18
C. 24
D. 36
E. 48



Since the shorter piece has an area of 12 square feet and a width of 2 feet, its length is 12/2 = 6 feet. Furthermore, since this is 1/3 of the length of the longer piece, the longer piece has a length of 6 x 3 = 18 feet. Therefore, the original piece of cloth has a total length of 6 + 18 = 24 feet.

Answer: C
avatar
B
Eduardo86
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 May 2020
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 29 [0]
Given Kudos: 182
Location: United Kingdom
Schools: Wharton '23 Kellogg '23
Send PM
Re: A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise [#permalink] New post   22 May 2020, 06:13
Let us consider the old segment C which was divided into two-pieces A and B. A=1/3B so 3A=B C=A+B or we can rewrite as C=4A.

The area of a rectangular is bxh.
1/3lxl=12
l^2=36
l=6

where l=A so C is 4x6=24
User avatar
L
Abhishek009
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Posts: 6072
Own Kudos [?]: 4690 [0]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise [#permalink] New post   08 Jan 2024, 08:08
Financier wrote:
A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two smaller rectangular pieces. The shorter piece was one-third the length of the longer of the 2 new pieces and had an area of 12 square feet. What was the length in feet of the original piece of cloth before cutting?

A. 6
B. 18
C. 24
D. 36
E. 48


\(\frac{L}{3} = 6\)

So, \(L = 18\)

Thus, Total length is \(18 + 6 = 24\), Answer must be (C)
Attachments

Rectangle.jpg
Rectangle.jpg [ 13.57 KiB | Viewed 516 times ]

GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise [#permalink]
08 Jan 2024, 08:08
Moderators:
Bunuel
Math Expert
92940 posts
yashikaaggarwal
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions