Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 234
Schools: Chicago Booth Class of 2013

A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 14 Nov 2013, 07:14
Question Stats:
61% (01:58) correct 39% (02:24) wrong based on 95 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two smaller rectangular pieces. The shorter piece was onethird the length of the longer of the 2 new pieces and had an area of 12 square feet. What was the length in feet of the original piece of cloth before cutting? A. 6 B. 18 C. 24 D. 36 E. 48
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by Financier on 20 Nov 2010, 23:47.
Last edited by Bunuel on 14 Nov 2013, 07:14, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic, edited the question and added the OA.




Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 10240
Location: Pune, India

Re: Wording / Geometry
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Nov 2010, 18:14
Financier wrote: Guys, Could you translate this task into human language? The task is simple, but wording is terrible. A rectangular piece 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two pieces. This means the width of the two pieces is still 2 feet each. The total length has got split into two parts. The smaller part has area 12 sq feet so its length must be 6 feet. Since this is 1/3rd of the length of the bigger piece, the length of the bigger piece must be 3 * 6 = 18 feet. Hence total original length must be 6 + 18 = 24 feet.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >




VP
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1183
GPA: 3.77

Re: Wording / Geometry
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Nov 2010, 00:03
Second sentence is terrible, how could it be "the shorter part......" if there is a rectangle cut lengthwise, so both parts must have the same length.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Posts: 185
WE 1: 4.6 years Exp IT prof

Re: Wording / Geometry
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Nov 2010, 13:25
answer should be 36 the rectangular cut lengthwise here suggests that the length is divided and the breadth remains the same



Intern
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 25
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.29
WE: Engineering (Consulting)

Re: Wording / Geometry
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Nov 2010, 15:24
amneetpadda wrote: answer should be 36 the rectangular cut lengthwise here suggests that the length is divided and the breadth remains the same I'm getting an answer = 24. Given: original rect has dimensions 2 by L Its not cut so there is two smaller rect. with one being bigger than the other. so dimensions are: rect_big = 2 by L_b rect_small = 2 by (1/3) L_b A_small = 12. therefore L_b = 18. so L = L_b + (1/3) L_b = (4/3) L_b = 24.



Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 67

Re: Wording / Geometry
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Nov 2010, 20:55
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: Financier wrote: Guys, Could you translate this task into human language? The task is simple, but wording is terrible. A rectangular piece 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two pieces. This means the width of the two pieces is still 2 feet each. The total length has got split into two parts. The smaller part has area 12 sq feet so its length must be 6 feet. Since this is 1/3rd of the length of the bigger piece, the length of the bigger piece must be 3 * 6 = 18 feet. Hence total original length must be 6 + 18 = 24 feet. Don't you mean that since L/3 = 6, therefore total length, L = 18?



Intern
Joined: 25 Nov 2009
Posts: 38
Location: India

Re: Wording / Geometry
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Nov 2010, 21:11
good one, getting pass the awkward wording is the butt of the question. calc are very simple.



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 10240
Location: Pune, India

Re: Wording / Geometry
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Nov 2010, 04:43
Werewolf wrote: Don't you mean that since L/3 = 6, therefore total length, L = 18?
Consider this: The question says, "Length of shorter piece is 1/3rd the length of longer of the two new pieces" This means after I split it into two pieces, I have a shorter piece and a longer one. The length of shorter is 1/3rd the length of longer. The 6 I found out was length of shorter piece. Then length of longer should be 18 and total length should be 24. Had it been the other way, the questions would have said "The length of shorter piece is 1/3rd the total length."
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 67

Re: Wording / Geometry
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Nov 2010, 07:38
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: Werewolf wrote: Don't you mean that since L/3 = 6, therefore total length, L = 18?
Consider this: The question says, "Length of shorter piece is 1/3rd the length of longer of the two new pieces" This means after I split it into two pieces, I have a shorter piece and a longer one. The length of shorter is 1/3rd the length of longer. The 6 I found out was length of shorter piece. Then length of longer should be 18 and total length should be 24. Had it been the other way, the questions would have said "The length of shorter piece is 1/3rd the total length." Thanks for the explanation Karishma. I misunderstood the language of the question. My apologies!!



Senior Manager
Joined: 25 May 2010
Posts: 283
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V25 GMAT 2: 560 Q47 V20 GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V25 GMAT 4: 680 Q49 V34

Re: Wording / Geometry
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Nov 2010, 07:51
I agree with @ VeritasPrepKarishma. I got 24 too. I've learnt one thing from NOVA GMAT Prep book. For any hard problems, always remove answer choices which are result of elementary operation( like +,,/ and*) on numbers mentioned in the question. It won't be a hard problem if answer can be reached using simple elementary operations. (L/3)*2=12 => L=18 So we can remove B option. VeritasPrepKarishma explained the solution correctly.
_________________
"Whether You Think You Can or Can't, You're Right"Henry Ford 680 Debrief600 Debrief590 DebriefMy GMAT Journey



Manager
Joined: 07 May 2013
Posts: 87

Re: Wording / Geometry
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Nov 2013, 04:31
Firstly, understand that length "shorter piece=1/3*longer piece". Therefore if shorter piece is say 'x' then longer piece is '3x'. Total length is x+3x=4x. Answer must be a multiple of 4. So, answer choices A and B are eliminated. Secondly he says that area of shorter piece is 12. Shorter piece represents 1/4 of total length. Now start with option C. Length of shorter piece=24/4=6. So, area of shorter piece is 2(given width)*6=12. This matches with the info given in the question and hence C. Is the answer.



Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 9960
Location: United States (CA)

A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Apr 2020, 07:22
Financier wrote: A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise into two smaller rectangular pieces. The shorter piece was onethird the length of the longer of the 2 new pieces and had an area of 12 square feet. What was the length in feet of the original piece of cloth before cutting?
A. 6 B. 18 C. 24 D. 36 E. 48
Since the shorter piece has an area of 12 square feet and a width of 2 feet, its length is 12/2 = 6 feet. Furthermore, since this is 1/3 of the length of the longer piece, the longer piece has a length of 6 x 3 = 18 feet. Therefore, the original piece of cloth has a total length of 6 + 18 = 24 feet. Answer: C
_________________
5star rated online GMAT quant self study course See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.




A rectangular piece of cloth 2 feet wide was cut lengthwise
[#permalink]
03 Apr 2020, 07:22






