During photosynthesis, chlorophyll is activated by visible light

Dear vasuca10,

I'm happy to respond.

My friend, as a general rule, don't post anything in any thread on GMAT Club until you have at least skimmed the discussion on the entire thread. In this thread, it would have been crucial to notice cledgard's comments in May & June 2017. This is NOT a GMAT CR practice question. It is a complete mess. The text was plagiarized from a scientific article. The sentence we are suppose to infer from the paragraph is the first sentence of the next paragraph: that sentence makes perfect sense in context, but there's no way we could be expected to predict that sentence from the content of this paragraph. If you are looking for GMAT CR practice, this question is an unmitigated disaster and a complete waste of time.

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Check the previous comment.

This is not a CR question. It is a joke!!! somebody got an article from the web and used it as a CR question.

https://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/2014/ ... merisation

You could use any of the answers.

Why is C not a correct answer? Can anybody advice on this?

Very tough question, except probably for biologists.

If the last sentence wants to round up the whole paragraph, it has to establish a link to the first part of the argument. It doesn't need to be its conclusion.

On this grounds we can eliminate choice C, which further discusses Boyer's approach and could theoretically go on forever without offering the reader any explanation for the first generalisation. Choice A introduces new team and new information and clearly has no connection to the first part of the argument. Choice D similarly introduces new phenomenon called "fluorescence emission", which I again cannot link to the whole argument. I eliminated choice E on the same logic.

Tough question for non-native speaker.

Can any expert offer his or her views on how to tackle such questions?

Thanks a million,
Jay

Unable to understand why the challenges faced in the latter process is the most effective way to complete the argument. E seems equally or maybe more compelling as it explains the reasoning behind pursuing the latter process; if the former process was an all-encompassing one, researchers wouldn't even have pursued the latter.

someone kindly explain why B is the answer?
my choice was D

why not e, it gives us the uses of the process polymerisation which has been discussed in the preceding sentence.

Got it, thanks - too technical, i would say though!

B - Choice brings the appropriate contrast for the sentence that starts with however ...
E - Appears to be right choice, but it doesnt add appropriate contrast..

During photosynthesis, chlorophyll is activated by visible light, and an electron is promoted from its ground state to an excited state. In plants, this excited electron goes on to react with carbon dioxide and water, via photo induced electron transfer (PET). However, in the system devised by Cyrille Boyer and colleagues at the University of New South Wales, the excited electron is donated to a monomer, generating a radical, which then goes on to further react and generate polymers through a process known as living radical polymerization.

Which of the following most effectively completes the paragraph above?

A. Inspired by nature, scientists in Australia have united light and chlorophyll to generate a range of polymers that have biomedical applications.
B. One of the challenges in polymer synthesis is achieving control over the length and structure of the polymers generated.
C. Boyer’s team has addressed this using a form of living polymerization called reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer, or RAFT, polymerization, which incorporates an agent, normally a thiocarbonlythio compound, as a mediating species.
D. In the absence of a proper electron donor or acceptor it is possible for such molecules to undergo ordinary fluorescence emission.
E. Various architectures, including star-shaped, comb-shaped and ring-shaped polymers can be synthesized in this way.

Acc to https://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/2014/ ... merisation
2nd para 1st line and 2nd para last line, both could complete the above argument

Can someone please shed some light on why E) is wrong? I understand why C is right. Since this is a doubtful Q, maybe both can be right
Thanks in advance

IMO OA is B

In my case, I concentrated on the last sentence.

'generating a radical, which then goes on to further react and generate polymers through a process known as living radical polymerization.'

-> radical, further react : It means that it is hard to contol.

So I chose B.

A. Inspired by nature, scientists in Australia have united light and chlorophyll to generate a range of polymers that have biomedical applications.
-> The most important thing is conclusion.
A is not include point of conclusion.
B. One of the challenges in polymer synthesis is achieving control over the length and structure of the polymers generated.
-> Keep
C. Boyer???s team has addressed this using a form of living polymerization called reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer, or RAFT,
polymerization, which incorporates an agent, normally a thiocarbonlythio compound, as a mediating species.
-> Same reason as A
C is not include point of conclusion
D. In the absence of a proper electron donor or acceptor it is possible for such molecules to undergo ordinary fluorescence emission.
-> incorrect. proper electron or acceptor are needed.
E. Various architectures, including star-shaped, comb-shaped and ring-shaped polymers can be synthesized in this way.
-> 'Shape' is out of scope.

Experts mikemcgarry GMATNinja sayantanc2k Please shed some light on this question...I chose Option E as the process of polymerisation has been explained through Option E

Thanks for the prompt response mikemcgarry