Last visit was: 28 Apr 2024, 05:18 It is currently 28 Apr 2024, 05:18

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92964
Own Kudos [?]: 619613 [0]
Given Kudos: 81613
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2023
Posts: 103
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 132
Location: India
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2023
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: Canada
Concentration: General Management, Real Estate
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92964
Own Kudos [?]: 619613 [0]
Given Kudos: 81613
Send PM
Re: Environmental groups are aggressively protesting the proposed use of [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
­Environmental groups are aggressively protesting the proposed use of a new technique for mining oil from the fringes of underground aquifers. These groups complain that such mining will lead to instances of contaminated groundwater and to sinkholes and other disasters in areas near the proposed mining. But, as the mining companies are quick to retort, the countries already using this technique have not reported any groundwater contamination or environmental issues. Therefore, it is safe to proceed with the new technique.

Which of the following, if true, most undermines the conclusion above?

(A) Some of the countries currently using the new technique have only been doing so for two years or less.

(B) Other widely-used techniques used to procure oil have led to even worse contamination issues than what environmentalists predict could happen with the new technique

(C) The countries currently using the technique are so dependent on oil revenue that they are unlikely to report any problems that might require them to stop.

(D) In the years that the new technique had been in use, several safeguards have been added to prevent the contamination of nearby water.

(E) All of the aquifers near which the proposed technique would be employed are used or will soon be used to provide drinking water for their surrounding communities.



­
This is a CR Butler Question

    Check the links to other Butler Projects:
 
­

­


VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:



Look at the gap in logic in this problem: the environmental groups are worried that contamination might HAPPEN but the conclusion is based upon the idea that no contamination has been REPORTED. But does "not reported" mean "didn't happen"? Not necessarily. Choice C seizes on that discrepancy and shows why contamination could happen but not be reported. Choice C is therefore correct.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Environmental groups are aggressively protesting the proposed use of [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne