Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 May 2017, 20:00

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1520
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 817 [0], given: 1

Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2008, 07:35
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

66% (01:50) correct 34% (00:57) wrong based on 242 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary before solar cells can meet the goal of providing one percent of the nation’s energy needs.

(A) that no less than a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary
(B) that nothing other than a technical or scientific breakthrough is needed
(C) that a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary
(D) the necessity for an occurrence of a technical or scientific breakthrough
(E) the necessity for a technical or scientific breakthrough occurring

[Reveal] Spoiler:
In this problem, I chose B, but the OA is C. What makes C better than B?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by hazelnut on 18 Apr 2017, 07:40, edited 2 times in total.
If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1082
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 0

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2008, 07:41
tarek99 wrote:
Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary before solar cells can meet the goal of providing one percent of the nation’s energy needs.

(A) that no less than a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary

(B) that nothing other than a technical or scientific breakthrough is needed

(C) that a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary

(D) the necessity for an occurrence of a technical or scientific breakthrough

(E) the necessity for a technical or scientific breakthrough occurring

In this problem, I chose B, but the OA is C. What makes C better than B?
Thanks

B is awkward ans wordy: nothing other is a bad negative form for C, which is plain and has a positive meaning. always prefer positive forms!
Current Student
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 186
Schools: Wharton
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 0

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2008, 10:32
ahh..

this is where i start to lose GMAT.

For me, A and B have different meaning and intention than C.
"no less than A" is not equal to "A" for me. The spirit of the sentence is to impart a sense of urgency and re-iterate the fact that efforts may be put in place, but the efforts will not succed unless they reach a certain level.

On the other hand, C seems to indicate that "a technical breakthrough is necessary", but does not address the fact that there may be efforts in place which may not be classified as technical breakthroughs, and therefore will fail.

anyone else see it this way?
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2562
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 453 [0], given: 0

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2008, 19:37
tarek99 wrote:
Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary before solar cells can meet the goal of providing one percent of the nation’s energy needs.

(A) that no less than a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary

(B) that nothing other than a technical or scientific breakthrough is needed

(C) that a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary

(D) the necessity for an occurrence of a technical or scientific breakthrough

(E) the necessity for a technical or scientific breakthrough occurring

In this problem, I chose B, but the OA is C. What makes C better than B?
Thanks

Go for brevity. There is nothing wrong with C so why chose the wordier B?
Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 790
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2008, 19:47
Struck between A and C

(A) hat no less than a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary (No less than verbose – "necessary" implies it or serves this purpose – Eliminate it)

(B) that nothing other than a technical or scientific breakthrough is needed (needed – Tense Change - Eliminate)

(C) that a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary (Hold it)

(D) the necessity for an occurrence of a technical or scientific breakthrough (Grammatically Correct – But verbose – Eliminate it)

(E) the necessity for a technical or scientific breakthrough occurring (Why to make it a present continuous tense – Eliminate it)
Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 73
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2008, 22:52
I will go for C. C is the most concise out of all the option list.
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 285
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 3

Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2009, 05:07
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary before solar cells can meet the goal of providing one percent of the nation’s energy needs.

(A) that no less than a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary
(B) that nothing other than a technical or scientific breakthrough is needed
(C) that a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary
(D) the necessity for an occurrence of a technical or scientific breakthrough
(E) the necessity for a technical or scientific breakthrough occurring
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 285
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [2] , given: 3

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2009, 07:12
2
KUDOS
Isnt the option C changing the meaning of the sentence.

The first sentence says that no less than a scientific breakthrough is necessary.. ie. alteast a scientific breakthrough or more than it..

The option C says straightly that a scientific breakthrough which distorts the meaning.

ie.

x no less than 50 doesnt mean that x is 50.

any takers ?
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2009
Posts: 102
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2009, 08:51
can you plz underline ur posts from now on
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2009
Posts: 102
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2009, 08:56
I agree...
C changes the meaning of the sentence...
IMO A
Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 826
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 106

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2009, 11:09
I agree and that's why I also go for A.

A has no grammatical error and keep the intent of the sentence intact.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Intern
Joined: 28 Aug 2008
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2009, 11:58
Neochronic wrote:
Isnt the option C changing the meaning of the sentence.

The first sentence says that no less than a scientific breakthrough is necessary.. ie. alteast a scientific breakthrough or more than it..

The option C says straightly that a scientific breakthrough which distorts the meaning.

ie.

x no less than 50 doesnt mean that x is 50.

any takers ?

Selectors conceded that No less than an all rounder is required in the team before it goes to the word cup.

Selectors conceded that an all rounder is required in the team before it goes to the world cup.

Don't u think second stmt is more straight forward.
Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 826
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 106

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2009, 13:20
imanonymoususer wrote:
Neochronic wrote:
Isnt the option C changing the meaning of the sentence.

The first sentence says that no less than a scientific breakthrough is necessary.. ie. alteast a scientific breakthrough or more than it..

The option C says straightly that a scientific breakthrough which distorts the meaning.

ie.

x no less than 50 doesnt mean that x is 50.

any takers ?

Selectors conceded that No less than an all rounder is required in the team before it goes to the word cup.

Selectors conceded that an all rounder is required in the team before it goes to the world cup.

Don't u think second stmt is more straight forward.

What my understanding from the
statement 1 ==> atleast 1 all rounder is required, but it could be possible that they may require 2 or 3 all rounders before going to the world cup
but, definitely, atleast one is required (not sure how many are reuired)

statement 2 ==> is distorting the meaning of first statement by saying that only 1 all rounder is required before going to world cup.

People Opinions?
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 818
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 73 [1] , given: 0

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2009, 15:56
1
KUDOS
C

"no less than a scientific break through is necessary" has the same meaning that "a scientific break through is neccessary" has. Why not make the sentence shorter and more concise?
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2009
Posts: 214
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 2

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2009, 23:12
I think that , 'no less than scientific breaktyhrough...' and 'a scientific breakthrough' are different in meaning. The former suggests that something atleast as good as (or better than) scientific breakthrough is required.
_________________

I do not suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it.

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 285
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 3

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2009, 09:26
Thanks for the discussion guys..

But the OA i have got for this Question is C.
Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 66
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 2

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2010, 12:25
choices can be narrowed down to AC. C is more succinct. It might appear the C is changing the meaning but in reality its not. When we say ‘no less than’, we are saying ‘equal or more’. The sentence in option C has the correct meaning by removing ‘the more’ part.
Intern
Joined: 29 May 2010
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2010, 21:04
sterny wrote:
ahh..

this is where i start to lose GMAT.

For me, A and B have different meaning and intention than C.
"no less than A" is not equal to "A" for me. The spirit of the sentence is to impart a sense of urgency and re-iterate the fact that efforts may be put in place, but the efforts will not succed unless they reach a certain level.

On the other hand, C seems to indicate that "a technical breakthrough is necessary", but does not address the fact that there may be efforts in place which may not be classified as technical breakthroughs, and therefore will fail.

anyone else see it this way?

Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 171
WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 33

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2010, 02:07
IMO C, it is concise, without any sacrifice in meaning
_________________

Regards,
Invincible...
"The way to succeed is to double your error rate."
"Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."

Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 155
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 28 [1] , given: 15

Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2010, 05:46
1
KUDOS
I don't agree that C has different meaning than A and B.

If anything "less than" (A) or "not a" (B) breakthrough is not acceptable, why not just say that in the sentence and concisely state what IS necessary.

I choose C.
Re: Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a   [#permalink] 21 Aug 2010, 05:46

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 32 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Although appearing less appetizing than most of their round 0 16 Jul 2015, 02:18
Although appearing less appetizing than most of their round 0 22 Apr 2015, 06:12
207 Although appearing less appetizing than most of their round 79 14 May 2017, 14:56
4 What does modifier "far less than most other laserjet 7 07 Feb 2015, 08:34
Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a 0 11 Oct 2016, 10:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by