GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 15 Aug 2018, 11:56

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 488
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2012, 03:42
@naruphanp

this is how you can understand the video/movie piracy.
suppose there are shops selling video CDs for movies etc... many people will buy them and watch the movie, but when people will start buying the CDs and sharing it with friends then the actual purchase will decline, where 10000 CDs used to sell , now only 4000 is purchased by people and these 4000 people are sharing the movie CDs with rest of the 6000 people or more.(Suppose a gang of friends with 10 guys, 1 brought the CD and after watching he shared it with other friends, or uploaded on some online channels, copied on other friends computers etc..)
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2012
Posts: 119
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.9
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2012, 08:39
2
naruphanp wrote:
@thevenus

thanks for the explanation. however, for choice A., couldn't it be possible for Venturama to sell 4000 and rent out an additional 6000? This would also make up for the 10,000 decline since Venturama both sells and rents videos.

Hey naruphanp,
As far as i understand the question, its about decreasing the amount of rentals in a particular area bcoz of opening of a new shop. Brad argues that the new shop sold only 4000 records, yet the total decrease was 10,000. Now, if we consider A, that new shop sold 4000, and rented out 6000, but this 6000 will add up to the total CDs rented in that year which means only the number of CDs rented reduced only by 4000. However, in option E, if 4000 people who had bought the CD, rent it to their friends, that wont be added to business done by the CD renters and eventually decrease the total amount of CDs rented by the shopkeepers, which can be the only possible explanation for the given question.
Senior Manager
Status: Now or never
Joined: 07 Aug 2010
Posts: 323
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 3.5
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2012, 12:04
1
We want to weaken Brads argument. The argument is that there is some other reason for the decline of rentals ,argument states that only 4000 were sold and decline is of 10000. We want to weaken Brads argument which can be done if we show that there is no other reason and infact decline is due to Videorama opening. 4000 sold if shared with 2 or 3 people means 8000 - 12000 number is possible. The crux is to attack the reasoning Brad presents.
_________________

Please press KUDOS if you like my post

SVP
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2226
Location: New York, NY
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2012, 13:45
2
1
It's really important to understand what DIRECTION you should be taking for this question.

We want to weaken Brad's argument. Brad was arguing against Jennifer --> essentially we are trying to find something that supports Jennifer's case.

Jennifer says: Decline is due to Videorama
Brad says: No, that's not true, something else is responsible

To weaken Brad's claim, we almost have to reaffirm that the decline is due to Videorama. We just need a more clear way to explain it.

Jennifer's claim can still be valid if we fill in some of the holes. Brad pointed out one of the holes, which was that Videorama only sold 4000 videos and there's a gap in order to reach the 10,000 decline in video rentals.

Now what can explain the gap?

(E) does the best job because if for every 1 video sold that cannibalized 2, 3 or more video rentals, than the cannibalization effect could be far in excess of 10,000 video rentals.

(A) also helps explain the gap but it's not strong enough. If Videorama rented out more than it sold, it's possible that it sold 4,000 and it rented 5,000. Together, that's 9,000 and so there's still 1,000 that cannot be explained. On the other hand, it's possible that 4,000 was sold but 6,000 was rented. That would reach the 10,000 and this would weaken Brad's argument. However, since it goes both ways it does not definitively weaken the argument...and would only be a "weak" method of weakening the argument.

(B) in a similar manner is "weak" and also is not relevant because it places the explanation on something other than Videorama, ie the other two stores, when clearly the argument is referring to Videorama.
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 20
Location: United States
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2012, 10:02
I got what Chris is trying to mention but doesnt it then supports Brad's statement ?? Brad clearly says that "there must be another explanation" and hence friend lending videos to friends is the "another explanation"....... so E supports Brad's statement...
VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1153
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2012, 06:50
1
thank you expert Christopher Lee for explanation of A

Can I name choice A "RBI" , "relevant but inconclusive". This choice is particularly popular on Assumption question. RBI answer choice offer a very attractive logic but not strong enough to be the correct answer on assumption and strengthen/weaken question.

being ready to see this type of incorrect anwer choice makes us more confident when we see 2 attractive choices. I am looking for 2 attract answer choice in all og questions.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Intern
Joined: 01 Dec 2012
Posts: 35
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GPA: 2.9
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2012, 00:36
Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply. Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?

A. In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold. ( it may not be correct as number may be from 4001 onwards ..So We cant say whether it weaken the argument or strengthen the argument)
B. In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville. (Out of Scope)
C. Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.(Out of Scope)( its not inlign with the argument conclusion)
D. People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.(Out of Scope)
E. People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends. ( correct . as it cleary present a doubt on the argument )
Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2012
Posts: 203
Concentration: Marketing, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 750 Q47 V47
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2012, 09:24
1

Video rentals in ENTIRE AREA decreased by 10,000. If 4,000 is attributed to purchase instead of rent, there is still a 6,000 gap.

A is absolutely incorrect. It does not matter that Videorama rented out more than it has sold. The rental figures were down across the entire area. Whatever Videorama had rented out were therefore already included in the rental figures. You are still dealing with a 6,000 video gap.

Only explanation is E. People who bought movies, lent them to friends. This impacted overall rental figures. Since Videorama seems to be the only outlet which has had direct impact on bought movies, this would weaken the argument.
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 822
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2012, 20:56
shikhar wrote:
Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply. Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?

A. In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
B. In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
C. Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
D. People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
E. People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.

I would like to bring the light upon option (A). as most of the members are getting confused.

Agenda is Decline in the number of Video Rentals of a area and new store is also in the area so according to option A Video rama has rented 4001 videos it would increase the Video rentals in the area.Idea behind argument is that how 4000 videos sold contribute to the figure 10000 , which is explained as in (E).
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2614
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Dec 2012, 02:11
3
shikhar wrote:
Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply. Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?

A. In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
B. In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
C. Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
D. People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
E. People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.

Hi,

The discussion so far has been very good.

The only confusion visible is between options A and E.

Brad's argument is that opening of Videorama could not be the explanation for decline in rentals since Videorama sold only 4000 videos against a total decline of 10,000 video rentals.

Prethinking Assumption:

Now, if we try to prethink the assumption in Brad's argument, it looks like this: one video sold should lead to a decline of one (nearly) video rental.

Prethinking Weakener:

Now, a weakener is something which weakens the assumption. Thus, a weakener could be like:
Some movies are rented more than once to the same person in a year. (If this is true, then people who buy these videos will not rent. Thus, every purchase would lead to twice or thrice the amount of decline in rentals)

Other weakener could be the one stated in option E. This statement means that every video purchase should lead to multiple times decline in the number of video rentals.

Therefore, E is the correct answer choice.

Now, coming to option A, please note that it is clearly stated the Videorama is located in the area. Thus, any video rentals by Videorama are counted in the figure for the area. Therefore, the number of video rentals by Videorama does not affect Brad's argument.

Hope this helps

Critical Reasoning questions are also asked in the new IR section of GMAT. Click on the below image to access a critical reasoning IR question with detailed approach to such questions.

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Intern
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 4
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Dec 2012, 08:21
first I chose A ....But I was so wrong, thanks for the wonderful explaination...kudos to all..
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 255
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Dec 2012, 12:27
Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply. Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?

A. In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold. Case 1: No. of Videorama rented out CD can be 4001 (or anything less than 6000. This implies still thier is a Gap of 10000 - 8001 = 1999. Case 2: No. of Videorama rented out CD can be > 6000. Then it satisfies the condition.

E. People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends. No. of loan at least = 2..4000 * 2= 8000. Therefore , no of people who watched the video = 4000 (owner) + 8000 (borrower) = 12000
_________________

YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN

VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1153
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2012, 04:14
thank you e gmat expert for detail posting. we wish e gmat post more on this forum and beatthegmat forum. secifically, on cr we like the expert posting.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 637
Location: India
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2012, 05:25
shikhar wrote:
Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply. Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?

A. In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
B. In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
C. Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
D. People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
E. People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.

Premise of the argument: "Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994." but "the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals"
Conclusion of the argument: The decline in rentals was probably not due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama

We need to weaken the above argument. Choice E weakens the premise that since it says that though there is a gap of 6000 videos to be accounted for, the gap which represents videos that were not bought can be explained by the fact that they were borrowed from friends who had bought them. That fills the gap and weakens Brad's premise.

Choice A seems close because if videorama handled say, 5000 rentals then the total number of videos handled by videorama becomes 5000+4000 which is 9000. That seems to only strengthen Jennifers argument that the decrease was probably almost entirely due to videorama. But the decline in rental is after including the rentals handled by videorama. So if as in choice A if videorama handled 5000 rentals, the others should have handled 15,000 rentals less. So it doesn't quite weaken Brad's argument as E does because there would be still the gap of 6000..
_________________

Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna Holistic Solutions
http://www.sravnatestprep.com

Holistic and Systematic Approach

Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 902
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2014, 08:01
calreg11 wrote:
A. In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold. (there is still an uncertainty here of whether Videorama handled 10k videos. if they rented out 4,001 videos then the totaled handled would still be less than 10k videos.

E. People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.
This give a good reason of what the cause of the situation is. Many people are giving rental less business.

Side note: how do we know for sure that it is the entire cause of the difference of 6k.

We don't have to calculate if it is 5.89k or 6k. We need to find out given the options, we can say if we can weaken the arguments.
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal

My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961

Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 158
Schools: LBS '18
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE: Design (Transportation)
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2014, 21:14
tech3 wrote:
Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993.
The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first
and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply.
Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000
rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad
presents to Jennifer's explanation?
A. In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
B. In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
C. Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
D. People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
E. People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.

Isn't E actually strengthening the argument?

When Jennifer says 'The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama' then Brad argues 'There must be another explanation'

Now option E i.e. People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends , is indeed another explanation.

Whereas the question says 'Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection'

Please correct me if i am wrong!
VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1192
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2014, 22:12
1
Brad argues that there must be some other explanation that does not have to do with the opening of videorama.

Because of videorama, people were now able to buy videos and rent them to their friends, thereby preventing the friends for renting videos.

On another note, I'm not a big fan of this question since it seems to require a lot of assumptions (as straightforward as they may be)on the reader's part. I'd like to know the source of this question. If it is not a reputed source, I suggest not bothering about the question any more.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 158
Schools: LBS '18
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE: Design (Transportation)
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2014, 22:27
Not sure what the source is, but you can find Manhattan staff answer this question here:

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/jen ... t8752.html
Intern
Joined: 08 Nov 2013
Posts: 17
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2015, 16:09
How can E be the answer? I went for A.
E talks about people loaning their CDs to friends. If this is the case, why would this trend suddenly change in 1994? People would have been following this practice of loaning CDs to friends for long time and would not suddenly increase or decrease so as to cause a 10k decline in sells. Moreover, this has nothing to do with opening of new shop at the town.

A seems to be best answer
Re: Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 &nbs [#permalink] 09 Jun 2015, 16:09

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 52 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.