Last visit was: 08 Jul 2025, 19:09 It is currently 08 Jul 2025, 19:09
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,099
 [119]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
108
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
30,099
 [20]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,099
 [20]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,232
Own Kudos:
5,842
 [12]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,232
Kudos: 5,842
 [12]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
WoundedTiger
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Last visit: 25 Sep 2024
Posts: 523
Own Kudos:
2,479
 [4]
Given Kudos: 740
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE:Business Development (Other)
Products:
Posts: 523
Kudos: 2,479
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
Maxwell’s theory of Electromagnetism in 1865 was the first “unified field theory”, with Electroweak in 1961 only being the other, because no further theory has united the electroweak field with either the Strong (Hadronic) force or Gravity.
A. with Electroweak in 1961 only being the other, because
B. with Electroweak in 1961 being the only other, because
C. and Electroweak in 1961 only was the other, because
D. and Electroweak in 1961 only being the other, as
E. and Electroweak in 1961 the only other, as


For a discussion of dropping common words in parallel structure, as well as a full explanation for this question, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/dropping-c ... -the-gmat/

Mike :-)


Hi Mike,

In the above we can clearly rule out A,B and C. In option D, If the sentence was " and Electroweak in 1961 being the other, as " could we pick D then over E as " being" is continuous verb form of "to be" indicating that it is still true.

Normally I don't select ans choice with being but it does make sense here. Please correct me if I am wrong

In OG, do we have Questions with this kind of structure.

Thanks :)
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
30,099
 [6]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,099
 [6]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WoundedTiger
Hi Mike,

In the above we can clearly rule out A,B and C. In option D, If the sentence was " and Electroweak in 1961 being the other, as " could we pick D then over E as " being" is continuous verb form of "to be" indicating that it is still true.

Normally I don't select ans choice with being but it does make sense here. Please correct me if I am wrong

In OG, do we have Questions with this kind of structure.

Thanks :)
Dear Wounded Tiger,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

You're correct that while "being" is usually not correct, it can appear in some correct answers. There are a couple problems with (D) though.

Problem #1 is that we have the form
[noun][verb]"and"[noun][participle]
That structure is wrong 100% of the time on the GMAT. Without the word "and", it could be correct ----
Maxwell’s theory of Electromagnetism in 1865 was the first “unified field theory”, Electroweak in 1961 being the only other, ...
although even there, the word "being" is not necessary. That would be an absolute phrase: see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/absolute-p ... -the-gmat/
Once we stick the "and" in, though, the structure becomes incorrect, a violation of parallelism. We can't put an independent clause in parallel with an absolute phrase.

Problem #2: consider this split:
(1) Electromagnetism in 1865 was the first, Electroweak in 1961 being the only other, ...
(2) Electromagnetism in 1865 was the first, Electroweak in 1961 only being the other, ...
The first correctly place the word "only" to indicate what is limited is that there aren't any more of these theories --- besides the first, there was just one more. The second awkwardly misplaces the word "only" --- by putting it in front of the participle "being", it seems to imply that there should be another action, another participle, more exalted or more powerful than "being." That's crazy --- that's not what the sentence is trying to say! The word "only" is suppose to indicate that there are just two of this kind of theory, so it properly belongs before the word "other."

Those are the two lethal problems with (D). This is why (E) is the best answer. Does this make sense?

Mike :-)
avatar
intheend14
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
Last visit: 08 Sep 2019
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 103
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.94
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
Posts: 127
Kudos: 144
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mike, a quick query for you. I read through your linked post on Magoosh about Dropping Common Words in Parallel on the GMAT. I understood all the explanations except this one.

As I read it, if you have "with + noun/phrase + participial phrase," this is incorrect on the GMAT. You should have a regular noun + verb phrase instead? Can you please clarify if I have misunderstood.
User avatar
samusa
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Last visit: 12 Feb 2023
Posts: 244
Own Kudos:
1,032
 [1]
Given Kudos: 410
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE:General Management (Energy)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
Posts: 244
Kudos: 1,032
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
intheend14
Mike, a quick query for you. I read through your linked post on Magoosh about Dropping Common Words in Parallel on the GMAT. I understood all the explanations except this one.

As I read it, if you have "with + noun/phrase + participial phrase," this is incorrect on the GMAT. You should have a regular noun + verb phrase instead? Can you please clarify if I have misunderstood.
Dear intheend14,
I'm happy to respond. :-) This is a very subtle issue. It depends very much on context. It's perfectly correct if the "with" expresses the ordinary uses of "with" --- accompaniment, means, or manner:
accompaniment: I went to town with my friend writing a book.
mean: He dug the first scoop of earth with a spade once used by 19th century railroad workers.
manner: He strut into the room with a gait simply broadcasting his confidence across the room..
Those constructions are not problematic.

The problem occurs when a writer replaces a valid subordinate clause structure with this "with" structure.

Since the shipment from Uzbekistan was late, the salesman was unable to close the deal. = correct
With the shipment from Uzbekistan being late, the salesman was unable to close the deal. = atrociously incorrect

Since our infantry has overrun most of the city, aerial attacks would not be effective at this time. = correct
With our infantry having overrun most of the city, aerial attacks would not be effective at this time = atrociously incorrect

Does this distinction make sense?
Mike :-)

Hi Mike

Thanks for your post!!

Can you help me with the following GMAT Prep Problem( with regard to the use of with)-

macjas
Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regenerative ability, and if one arm is lost it quickly replaces it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating and growing an extra one or two.

A one arm is lost it quickly replaces it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating and
B one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating and
C they lose one arm they quickly replace it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating,
D they lose one arm they are quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating,
E they lose one arm it is quickly replaced, sometimes with the animal overcompensating,

OA is B;

Please clarify what is the use of with in choice B-one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating and

Is with being used to convey accompaniment or manner.?

Also as I understand,the first with that appears in the original sentence means accompaniment.

But what about the use of with in choice B??

Thanks!!
avatar
andersonr95
Joined: 19 Feb 2017
Last visit: 29 Aug 2017
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Mike,

I have two quick questions on this that I'd really appreciate some help on. The first is whether the '..., and ...' is being used to connect two Independent Clauses. Is option E the equivalent of "and Electroweak in 1961 [was] the only other ["unified field theory"], as" with the bracketed portions omitted due to parallelism?

My second question is about the "because"/"as" split. I was under the impression that "because" is used to modify clauses, as it does in answers A, B, and C. Is this split an opportunity for eliminating answer choices? If so, would you mind explaining why?

Thanks
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,099
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
andersonr95
Hi Mike,

I have two quick questions on this that I'd really appreciate some help on. The first is whether the '..., and ...' is being used to connect two Independent Clauses. Is option E the equivalent of "and Electroweak in 1961 [was] the only other ["unified field theory"], as" with the bracketed portions omitted due to parallelism?

My second question is about the "because"/"as" split. I was under the impression that "because" is used to modify clauses, as it does in answers A, B, and C. Is this split an opportunity for eliminating answer choices? If so, would you mind explaining why?

Thanks
Dear andersonr95,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

I don't know whether you read the linked article, but if you had, you would see that your "reconstructed" version of (E) is perfectly correct.

In this context, "because" and "as" are almost completely synonymous. Both are subordinating conjunctions that begin verb-modifying clauses that explain the cause of something or reason for something. They are essentially interchangeable here, so this does not constitute a split of any kind. This is a "false split": the GMAT loves to pepper SC questions with these.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
Nightmare007
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Last visit: 05 Aug 2020
Posts: 438
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
Posts: 438
Kudos: 428
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi mike,
As per my understanding, the word "and" when used as subordinate conjunction joining two distinct ideas we use a "," and These two joined clauses must have a valid S-V pair. but, In E i observe that there is no proper verb. Can you please explain me this construction and correct my understanding of concept by throwing some light on it.
daagh Sir, please help me out here.
User avatar
saarthak299
Joined: 16 May 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2018
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 158
Posts: 31
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
Maxwell’s theory of Electromagnetism in 1865 was the first “unified field theory”, with Electroweak in 1961 only being the other, because no further theory has united the electroweak field with either the Strong (Hadronic) force or Gravity.
A. with Electroweak in 1961 only being the other, because
B. with Electroweak in 1961 being the only other, because
C. and Electroweak in 1961 only was the other, because
D. and Electroweak in 1961 only being the other, as
E. and Electroweak in 1961 the only other, as


For a discussion of dropping common words in parallel structure, as well as a full explanation for this question, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/dropping-c ... -the-gmat/

Mike :-)

hey mike,
I selected E as an option but why is C wrong ?
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,099
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nightmare007
Hi mike,
As per my understanding, the word "and" when used as subordinate conjunction joining two distinct ideas we use a "," and These two joined clauses must have a valid S-V pair. but, In E i observe that there is no proper verb. Can you please explain me this construction and correct my understanding of concept by throwing some light on it. daagh Sir, please help me out here.
Dear Nightmare007,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

First of all, the word "and" is NOT a subordinate conjunction, one that introduces a dependent clause. Instead, "and" is a "coordinating conjunction," joining two items of equal grammatical categories.

Also, I am going to point out that the very point of the question, and what you failed to understand about (E), is explained in the blog linked at the top of this page. Read that blog carefully, and let me know if you have any further questions after doing so.

Does all this make sense?
saarthak299
hey mike,
I selected E as an option but why is C wrong ?
Dear saarthak299,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

The word "only" has an odd placement in (C). The phrasing "was the only other" is 100% correct. The phrasing "only was the other" is terribly awkward and odd sounding. In general, the word "only" direct precedes the word it limits. When it comes before "other," it correct signifies that there was not more than one other. When it comes before "was," though, it is puzzling: it seems as if the verb "was," a form of the verb "to be," was too limiting as an action, as if we were expecting something more than the act of being (?). Because what it would imply is so contorted and bizarre, this phrasing sounds awkward and off. That's what's wrong with (C).

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
leanhdung
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Last visit: 30 Jun 2023
Posts: 170
Own Kudos:
153
 [1]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
Posts: 170
Kudos: 153
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Maxwell’s theory of Electromagnetism in 1865 was the first “unified field theory”, with Electroweak in 1961 only being the other, because no further theory has united the electroweak field with either the Strong (Hadronic) force or Gravity.

A. with Electroweak in 1961 only being the other, because
B. with Electroweak in 1961 being the only other, because
C. and Electroweak in 1961 only was the other, because
D. and Electroweak in 1961 only being the other, as
E. and Electroweak in 1961 the only other, as
avatar
naveens222
Joined: 06 Oct 2015
Last visit: 23 Dec 2018
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 10
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Maxwell’s theory of Electromagnetism in 1865 was the first “unified field theory”, with Electroweak in 1961 only being the other, because no further theory has united the electroweak field with either the Strong (Hadronic) force or Gravity.

-->shouldn't the "comma (,)" be included in the underlined section??
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,520
Own Kudos:
5,695
 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,520
Kudos: 5,695
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
naveens222
Maxwell’s theory of Electromagnetism in 1865 was the first “unified field theory”, with Electroweak in 1961 only being the other, because no further theory has united the electroweak field with either the Strong (Hadronic) force or Gravity.

-->shouldn't the "comma (,)" be included in the underlined section??

Hey naveens222 ,

No, if we remove the comma before "and", we may have to remove the comma after "the only other" as well. Since we are using a comma after "the only other", the comma before "and" is required.

You need to understand the construction of the sentence properly.

Maxwell’s theory of Electromagnetism in 1865 was the first “unified field theory”, and Electroweak in 1961 the only other, as no further theory has united the electroweak field with either the Strong (Hadronic) force or Gravity.

The purpose of using two comma and the information "and Electroweak in 1961 the only other" between them IS to emphasis the fact that "and Electroweak in 1961 the only other" is the extra information that has been used to explain the sentence.

If we remove this information, our sentence MUST still make sense as shown below. Our emphasis is on telling the fact that his theory was the first as we don'thave any other theory before his theory. The extra information is just adding information that we have one more after his theory.

Maxwell’s theory of Electromagnetism in 1865 was the first “unified field theory” as no further theory has united the electroweak field with either the Strong (Hadronic) force or Gravity.

Does that make sense?
User avatar
Youraisemeup
Joined: 17 Oct 2015
Last visit: 26 Sep 2023
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 453
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 700 Q44 V41
WE:Corporate Finance (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 2: 700 Q44 V41
Posts: 132
Kudos: 330
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh sir, please help on this. I am unable to eliminate choices based on what GMAT likes or dislikes. I'd rather stick to resolving it grammatically
User avatar
Blair15
Joined: 07 Oct 2020
Last visit: 09 Apr 2025
Posts: 210
Own Kudos:
132
 [1]
Given Kudos: 230
Location: India
GRE 1: Q167 V159
GPA: 9.24
GRE 1: Q167 V159
Posts: 210
Kudos: 132
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nightmare007
Hi mike,
As per my understanding, the word "and" when used as subordinate conjunction joining two distinct ideas we use a "," and These two joined clauses must have a valid S-V pair. but, In E i observe that there is no proper verb. Can you please explain me this construction and correct my understanding of concept by throwing some light on it.
daagh Sir, please help me out here.


Hi experts,

isn't comma before FANBOYS an indication a new independent clause? This is the first question that i am solving where what i mentioned is not the case. Can someone provide more questions or explanations on this?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 2,945
Own Kudos:
8,382
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 2,945
Kudos: 8,382
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Blair15

You have things a bit reversed. If we want to follow a new independent clause with a comma, we need a FANBOYS conjunction to make the connection. However, it's quite common to see such a conjunction when we're not making an independent clause:

I like pizza, spaghetti, and garlic bread.
The jury agreed that he had followed the letter, but not the spirit, of the law.
She found the car, or what was left of it, on the side of the road.
User avatar
Putup577
Joined: 11 Oct 2022
Last visit: 29 Jan 2025
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 19
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
May I have your advice about choice E?

It has a comma after ???unified field theory???. In this case, " and " is put after the comma, should it need to be followed by the clause or sentence ? In choice E, it is only a phase (Electroweak in 1961 the only other).

Another question is about "Because " and " as". My understanding is both of these words act as transition functions, am I correct?

Thank you in advance
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 2,945
Own Kudos:
8,382
 [2]
Given Kudos: 57
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 2,945
Kudos: 8,382
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Putup577

Please see my comment directly above yours. It's quite common to see COMMA+AND without a full clause.

The word "as" has many uses. But when it's used to mean "because," as it is here, then yes, that creates a transition. But that transition can happen in different ways. For instance, if I have a clause followed by "because," that might be followed by another clause or by a modifier (e.g. "because I was sleepy" or "because of the wind"). A clause followed by "as" (used to mean because) can only be followed by a clause. (I couldn't say "We stayed inside as of the wind"!!) However, "as" can introduce a modifier or noun under other circumstances: "I howled as loudly as the wind."
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts