It is currently 23 Feb 2018, 02:49

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# My best friend has recently read in a local newspaper that

Author Message
Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 538
My best friend has recently read in a local newspaper that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2009, 07:40
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

My best friend has recently read in a local newspaper that some cars sold at local centers are expensive, while others are less so expensive.

(A) while others are less so expensive
(B) while the others are less so
(C) while others are less so
(D) while the others are less so expensive
(E) while other cars are less so expensive
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 484
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2009, 12:00
Hi mates,

At first read I had doubts if "others" can refer to cars or local centers, but clearly it refers to cars

So, IMO C

A and D out: "so" and "expensive" cannot go together
B out: "the" is not needed...
E out: repeating cars again is not needed

OA and Source?

Cheers
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Intern
Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 20

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2009, 18:48
anyone choose E here?

"others" could mean other cars or other centers, so i choose E

My best friend has recently read in a local newspaper that some cars sold at local centers are expensive, while others are less so expensive.

(A) while others are less so expensive
(B) while the others are less so
(C) while others are less so
(D) while the others are less so expensive
(E) while other cars are less so expensive
Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 31

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2009, 06:53
I chose E..

Reason: all option had "others" which is a singular and the subject "some cars" refres to plural, hence the reference "Other".

OA Pls
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 426
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2009, 07:56
I think there is no hint of change of meaning any where in the sentence. The comparision that is being done here is clearly between expensive cars and not expensive cars

'others' cannot refer back to 'stations' because the sentence begins with "some cars are....while others are....." The object of comparison is always cars

I'll go in with C.But this sentence is very awkward (never heard of such a thing anywhere!)

Cheers,
Unplugged
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1401

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2009, 08:42
unplugged wrote:
I think there is no hint of change of meaning any where in the sentence. The comparision that is being done here is clearly between expensive cars and not expensive cars

'others' cannot refer back to 'stations' because the sentence begins with "some cars are....while others are....." The object of comparison is always cars

I'll go in with C.But this sentence is very awkward (never heard of such a thing anywhere!)

Cheers,
Unplugged

I disagree. Unless all the answer choices use the same ambiguous pronoun reference, I take it as a possible error. Meaning is what we understand. I agree logically that we are comparing cars to cars but grammatically it could be both cars/centers. You might say lets plug in centers for others and it does not make sense. Can we plug in or not is the Q? Does it make sense or not is not the Q? Hence I chose E

I agree that its a weird Q though
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 426
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2009, 09:57
I agree with your logic but why is the OA D for the below question even though choice E tries to correct the pronoun reference error( I know about will/would error but pronoun reference error is a relatively major one)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.
(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could
(D) think that they will be or could
(E) think the power stations would or could
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cheers,
Unplugged
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1401

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2009, 13:19

See what Ron Purewal said

>>>>>>

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post4371.html

Neither do I, at least for GMAT purposes (meaning I wouldn't object to this sentence if I read it in a newspaper, but I know that the GMAT writers would ax it): 'they' could, technically, refer either to the power stations or to the journalists.

<<<<<<<

I will take that OA with a grain of salt. If we see similar GMAT PREP Q, then I would be really concerned. For now, my strategy is NOT to worry when the pronoun reference that seems ambiguous is in all the answer choices. Essentially saying that its not an issue. Other wise it is an issue. After all the Q quoted was from 1000 series, whose origins are unknown and who knows how it got mucked.
SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1789
Location: New York

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2009, 13:21
icandy wrote:

See what Ron Purewal said

>>>>>>

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post4371.html

Neither do I, at least for GMAT purposes (meaning I wouldn't object to this sentence if I read it in a newspaper, but I know that the GMAT writers would ax it): 'they' could, technically, refer either to the power stations or to the journalists.

<<<<<<<

I will take that OA with a grain of salt. If we see similar GMAT PREP Q, then I would be really concerned. For now, my strategy is NOT to worry when the pronoun reference that seems ambiguous is in all the answer choices. Essentially saying that its not an issue. Other wise it is an issue. After all the Q quoted was from 1000 series, whose origins are unknown and who knows how it got mucked.

IMO,
Answers for many questions from 1000 series are debatable and we shouldn't be worry much about them.
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2008
Posts: 100

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2009, 15:47
I hate this sentence.

I say C.

E is very good outside of the last 3 words, I especially like how it clears up a semi-ambiguous pronoun reference.
Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 799

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2009, 21:31
icandy wrote:

See what Ron Purewal said

>>>>>>

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post4371.html

Neither do I, at least for GMAT purposes (meaning I wouldn't object to this sentence if I read it in a newspaper, but I know that the GMAT writers would ax it): 'they' could, technically, refer either to the power stations or to the journalists.

<<<<<<<

I will take that OA with a grain of salt. If we see similar GMAT PREP Q, then I would be really concerned. For now, my strategy is NOT to worry when the pronoun reference that seems ambiguous is in all the answer choices. Essentially saying that its not an issue. Other wise it is an issue. After all the Q quoted was from 1000 series, whose origins are unknown and who knows how it got mucked.

"less so expensive" doesnt sound right. You would simply say less expensive.
in the correct choice, the "expensive" is implied by "so"
Re: SC: Expensive   [#permalink] 10 Feb 2009, 21:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by