Last visit was: 27 Apr 2024, 21:04 It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 21:04

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Apr 2011
Posts: 36
Own Kudos [?]: 239 [23]
Given Kudos: 51
Location: United States
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1005
Own Kudos [?]: 3121 [11]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9247 [6]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 Jul 2011
Status:Life begins at the End of your Comfort Zone
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [2]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: Tajikistan
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.86
Send PM
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
That would be (C), the thoughts behind my choice set forth below:
Let it be:
2007 - x
2008 - x+0.3x=1.3x
2009 - 1.3x*1.3=1.69x
2010 - (x-1.69x)/1.69x = - 0.69x/1.69x = -0.408~-41%
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Status:How easy it is?
Posts: 74
Own Kudos [?]: 408 [0]
Given Kudos: 174
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE:Operations (Other)
Send PM
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]
The question is pretty easy, but if someone could highlight how to approximate 69/169 to 41%? There is a close answer choice of 39% as well, this takes up a lot of time in a real test and you end up getting a supposedly easy question wrong!
Retired Moderator
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Status:On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Posts: 261
Own Kudos [?]: 655 [2]
Given Kudos: 134
Send PM
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]
1
Kudos
nitin6305 wrote:
The question is pretty easy, but if someone could highlight how to approximate 69/169 to 41%? There is a close answer choice of 39% as well, this takes up a lot of time in a real test and you end up getting a supposedly easy question wrong!


(69+1)/(169+1)>69/169
70/170>69/169
7/17>69/169
0.411>69/169

Therefore, 69/169 is slightly less than 0.411 or almost 0.41 (41%)
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18768
Own Kudos [?]: 22071 [1]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
joylive wrote:
In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?

A. 30%
B. 39%
C. 41%
D. 69%
E. 169%


We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced.

We need to determine the percentage decrease necessary to drop from 169 widgets to 100 widgets. Let’s use the percent change formula:

(100 - 169)/169 x 100% ≈ -40.8%

Answer: C
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 May 2018
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [1]
Given Kudos: 61
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.9
Send PM
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
ScottTargetTestPrep wrote:
joylive wrote:
In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?

A. 30%
B. 39%
C. 41%
D. 69%
E. 169%


We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced.

We need to determine the percentage decrease necessary to drop from 169 widgets to 100 widgets. Let’s use the percent change formula:

(100 - 169)/169 x 100% ≈ -40.8%

Answer: C



thank you for sharing this explanation, this is very helpful
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18768
Own Kudos [?]: 22071 [0]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]
Expert Reply
MBAHanover2018 wrote:
ScottTargetTestPrep wrote:
joylive wrote:
In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?

A. 30%
B. 39%
C. 41%
D. 69%
E. 169%


We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced.

We need to determine the percentage decrease necessary to drop from 169 widgets to 100 widgets. Let’s use the percent change formula:

(100 - 169)/169 x 100% ≈ -40.8%

Answer: C



thank you for sharing this explanation, this is very helpful


My pleasure!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Dec 2011
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 141
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
Send PM
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]
We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced.


is this ok??
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Jan 2018
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 75 [0]
Given Kudos: 759
Send PM
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]
ab1 wrote:
We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced.


is this ok??


U r getting confused between "30% more produced as compared to 2007" and "130% of its production in 2008". Take a closer look both are same in context of the question.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Oct 2021
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [2]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]
2
Kudos
In 2007 production = x
In 2008 production = 1.3x
In 2009 production = 1.3*1.3x = 1.69x
In 2010 production change = (1.69x-1x)/(1.69x) = approx 41%
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32715
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92959 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne