Jul 19 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT The Competition Continues  Game of Timers is a teambased competition based on solving GMAT questions to win epic prizes! Starting July 1st, compete to win prep materials while studying for GMAT! Registration is Open! Ends July 26th Jul 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Jul 21 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 18 Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Location: United States
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Nov 2012, 08:28
Question Stats:
49% (02:02) correct 51% (02:04) wrong based on 428 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007? A. 30% B. 39% C. 41% D. 69% E. 169%
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1153
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Nov 2012, 12:13
joylive wrote: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007? A. 30% B. 39% C. 41% D. 69% E. 169% Lets assume no. of widgets in 07 = 100 Number of widgets in 08 = 130 Number of widgets in 09 = 169 Decrease required = \(\frac{169100}{169} = \frac{69}{169}\) = 41% Answer is C. Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________




Intern
Status: Life begins at the End of your Comfort Zone
Joined: 31 Jul 2011
Posts: 43
Location: Tajikistan
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.86

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Nov 2012, 12:11
That would be (C), the thoughts behind my choice set forth below: Let it be: 2007  x 2008  x+0.3x=1.3x 2009  1.3x*1.3=1.69x 2010  (x1.69x)/1.69x =  0.69x/1.69x = 0.408~41%
_________________



Manager
Status: How easy it is?
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 88
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27 GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Other)

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Sep 2014, 08:27
The question is pretty easy, but if someone could highlight how to approximate 69/169 to 41%? There is a close answer choice of 39% as well, this takes up a lot of time in a real test and you end up getting a supposedly easy question wrong!



Retired Moderator
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 304

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Sep 2014, 09:21
nitin6305 wrote: The question is pretty easy, but if someone could highlight how to approximate 69/169 to 41%? There is a close answer choice of 39% as well, this takes up a lot of time in a real test and you end up getting a supposedly easy question wrong! (69+1)/(169+1)>69/169 70/170>69/169 7/17>69/169 0.411>69/169 Therefore, 69/169 is slightly less than 0.411 or almost 0.41 (41%)



GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1728

In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Sep 2014, 10:00
nitin6305 wrote: The question is pretty easy, but if someone could highlight how to approximate 69/169 to 41%? There is a close answer choice of 39% as well, this takes up a lot of time in a real test and you end up getting a supposedly easy question wrong! I don't think you'll ever need to worry about this on the real GMAT  in real GMAT questions asking for estimates, the answers will usually be far enough apart that you can actually estimate fairly easily. But even in this case, there are a couple of interesting techniques we can use to bypass long division. Here, if you can tell the right answer choice is either 39% or 41%, you really just need to know if 69/169 > 0.4 to pick the right answer. There are a few ways to make that decision quickly. You might locate a fraction which is exactly equal to 4/10 and that looks similar to 69/169. Notice if we multiply by 17 in the numerator and denominator, we find that 4/10 = 68/170. But notice now that 69/169 > 68/170, since 69/169 has both a larger numerator and a smaller denominator than 68/170. So 69/169 > 0.4, and 0.41 is a better estimate than 0.39. Or you could notice that (0.4)*169/169 is exactly equal to 0.4 (just cancel the 169), and is exactly equal to 67.6/169. Since this is clearly smaller than 69/169, we can see that 69/169 is larger than 0.4. If you prefer to avoid decimals, you can instead write down the following inequality (this method is mathematically the same as the one above, though) : 69/169 > 4/10 We want to know if this is true. If it is, then when we rewrite it, what we arrive at must be true. If you multiply by 169 and 10 on both sides, you find 690 > 4*169 = 676 and since this is true, the original inequality was true as well. If you know that rounding 69/169 to 70/170 = 7/17 has only a negligible influence on the overall value of the fraction, then the above techniques are even easier to apply, but I've not done that here since it may not be clear how much that approximation will affect the fraction's value.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com



Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 6923
Location: United States (CA)

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 May 2017, 06:19
joylive wrote: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?
A. 30% B. 39% C. 41% D. 69% E. 169% We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced. We need to determine the percentage decrease necessary to drop from 169 widgets to 100 widgets. Let’s use the percent change formula: (100  169)/169 x 100% ≈ 40.8% Answer: C
_________________
5star rated online GMAT quant self study course See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.



Intern
Joined: 16 May 2018
Posts: 31
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
GPA: 3.9

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2018, 14:05
ScottTargetTestPrep wrote: joylive wrote: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?
A. 30% B. 39% C. 41% D. 69% E. 169% We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced. We need to determine the percentage decrease necessary to drop from 169 widgets to 100 widgets. Let’s use the percent change formula: (100  169)/169 x 100% ≈ 40.8% Answer: C thank you for sharing this explanation, this is very helpful



Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 6923
Location: United States (CA)

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Sep 2018, 10:40
MBAHanover2018 wrote: ScottTargetTestPrep wrote: joylive wrote: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?
A. 30% B. 39% C. 41% D. 69% E. 169% We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced. We need to determine the percentage decrease necessary to drop from 169 widgets to 100 widgets. Let’s use the percent change formula: (100  169)/169 x 100% ≈ 40.8% Answer: C thank you for sharing this explanation, this is very helpful My pleasure!
_________________
5star rated online GMAT quant self study course See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.



Intern
Joined: 15 Dec 2011
Posts: 2
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Sep 2018, 20:21
We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced.
is this ok??



Intern
Joined: 21 Jan 2018
Posts: 10

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Dec 2018, 23:35
ab1 wrote: We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced.
is this ok?? U r getting confused between "30% more produced as compared to 2007" and "130% of its production in 2008". Take a closer look both are same in context of the question.




Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets
[#permalink]
22 Dec 2018, 23:35






