GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Oct 2018, 21:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 18 Apr 2011
Posts: 41
Location: United States
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2012, 08:28
4
12
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (01:24) correct 54% (01:10) wrong based on 360 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?

A. 30%
B. 39%
C. 41%
D. 69%
E. 169%
VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1184
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2012, 12:13
7
1
joylive wrote:
In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?
A. 30%
B. 39%
C. 41%
D. 69%
E. 169%

Lets assume no. of widgets in 07 = 100
Number of widgets in 08 = 130
Number of widgets in 09 = 169

Decrease required = $$\frac{169-100}{169} = \frac{69}{169}$$

= 41%

Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

##### General Discussion
Intern
Status: Life begins at the End of your Comfort Zone
Joined: 31 Jul 2011
Posts: 43
Location: Tajikistan
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.86
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2012, 12:11
1
1
That would be (C), the thoughts behind my choice set forth below:
Let it be:
2007 - x
2008 - x+0.3x=1.3x
2009 - 1.3x*1.3=1.69x
2010 - (x-1.69x)/1.69x = - 0.69x/1.69x = -0.408~-41%
_________________

Manager
Status: How easy it is?
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 98
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Other)
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2014, 08:27
The question is pretty easy, but if someone could highlight how to approximate 69/169 to 41%? There is a close answer choice of 39% as well, this takes up a lot of time in a real test and you end up getting a supposedly easy question wrong!
Retired Moderator
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 335
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2014, 09:21
1
1
nitin6305 wrote:
The question is pretty easy, but if someone could highlight how to approximate 69/169 to 41%? There is a close answer choice of 39% as well, this takes up a lot of time in a real test and you end up getting a supposedly easy question wrong!

(69+1)/(169+1)>69/169
70/170>69/169
7/17>69/169
0.411>69/169

Therefore, 69/169 is slightly less than 0.411 or almost 0.41 (41%)
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1327
In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2014, 10:00
3
nitin6305 wrote:
The question is pretty easy, but if someone could highlight how to approximate 69/169 to 41%? There is a close answer choice of 39% as well, this takes up a lot of time in a real test and you end up getting a supposedly easy question wrong!

I don't think you'll ever need to worry about this on the real GMAT - in real GMAT questions asking for estimates, the answers will usually be far enough apart that you can actually estimate fairly easily. But even in this case, there are a couple of interesting techniques we can use to bypass long division.

Here, if you can tell the right answer choice is either 39% or 41%, you really just need to know if 69/169 > 0.4 to pick the right answer. There are a few ways to make that decision quickly. You might locate a fraction which is exactly equal to 4/10 and that looks similar to 69/169. Notice if we multiply by 17 in the numerator and denominator, we find that 4/10 = 68/170. But notice now that 69/169 > 68/170, since 69/169 has both a larger numerator and a smaller denominator than 68/170. So 69/169 > 0.4, and 0.41 is a better estimate than 0.39.

Or you could notice that (0.4)*169/169 is exactly equal to 0.4 (just cancel the 169), and is exactly equal to 67.6/169. Since this is clearly smaller than 69/169, we can see that 69/169 is larger than 0.4.

If you prefer to avoid decimals, you can instead write down the following inequality (this method is mathematically the same as the one above, though) :

69/169 > 4/10

We want to know if this is true. If it is, then when we rewrite it, what we arrive at must be true. If you multiply by 169 and 10 on both sides, you find

690 > 4*169 = 676

and since this is true, the original inequality was true as well.

If you know that rounding 69/169 to 70/170 = 7/17 has only a negligible influence on the overall value of the fraction, then the above techniques are even easier to apply, but I've not done that here since it may not be clear how much that approximation will affect the fraction's value.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 3896
Location: United States (CA)
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 May 2017, 06:19
joylive wrote:
In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?

A. 30%
B. 39%
C. 41%
D. 69%
E. 169%

We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced.

We need to determine the percentage decrease necessary to drop from 169 widgets to 100 widgets. Let’s use the percent change formula:

(100 - 169)/169 x 100% ≈ -40.8%

_________________

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO

GMAT Quant Self-Study Course
500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions

Intern
Joined: 16 May 2018
Posts: 32
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
Schools: Haas '21, Tuck '21
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.9
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2018, 14:05
1
ScottTargetTestPrep wrote:
joylive wrote:
In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?

A. 30%
B. 39%
C. 41%
D. 69%
E. 169%

We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced.

We need to determine the percentage decrease necessary to drop from 169 widgets to 100 widgets. Let’s use the percent change formula:

(100 - 169)/169 x 100% ≈ -40.8%

thank you for sharing this explanation, this is very helpful
Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 3896
Location: United States (CA)
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2018, 10:40
MBAHanover2018 wrote:
ScottTargetTestPrep wrote:
joylive wrote:
In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?

A. 30%
B. 39%
C. 41%
D. 69%
E. 169%

We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced.

We need to determine the percentage decrease necessary to drop from 169 widgets to 100 widgets. Let’s use the percent change formula:

(100 - 169)/169 x 100% ≈ -40.8%

thank you for sharing this explanation, this is very helpful

My pleasure!
_________________

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO

GMAT Quant Self-Study Course
500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions

Intern
Joined: 15 Dec 2011
Posts: 3
Location: India
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2018, 20:21
We can let the number of widgets produced in 2007 = 100. Thus, in 2008, 1.3 x 100 = 130 widgets were produced, and in 2009, 1.3 x 130 = 169 widgets were produced.

is this ok??
Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets &nbs [#permalink] 28 Sep 2018, 20:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by