Last visit was: 31 Oct 2024, 16:08 It is currently 31 Oct 2024, 16:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
yvonne0923
Joined: 10 Apr 2011
Last visit: 04 May 2012
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
323
 [68]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 30
Kudos: 323
 [68]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
62
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
gmat1220
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 17 Feb 2020
Posts: 467
Own Kudos:
917
 [12]
Given Kudos: 123
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Products:
Posts: 467
Kudos: 917
 [12]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
vivesomnium
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Last visit: 18 Mar 2018
Posts: 174
Own Kudos:
470
 [3]
Given Kudos: 13
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Posts: 174
Kudos: 470
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
subhashghosh
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Last visit: 25 Jun 2024
Posts: 903
Own Kudos:
1,213
 [2]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Products:
Posts: 903
Kudos: 1,213
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E introduces contrast, while A introduces explanation. The sentence should make sense as to why the Cello solo salvaged the Performance.
User avatar
bagdbmba
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Last visit: 10 Dec 2021
Posts: 1,007
Own Kudos:
4,109
 [1]
Given Kudos: 156
Posts: 1,007
Kudos: 4,109
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts,
Can you please explain why C is incorrect? Doesn't it indicate towards the situation that 'most of the orchestra members played poorly throughout the two hour concert' ?
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,215
 [3]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,215
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Text says that the cello performance was at the end; not at the same time as the performance of the orchestra members- There is a meaning change in C
User avatar
aviram
Joined: 27 Jun 2014
Last visit: 09 Feb 2016
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
115
 [4]
Given Kudos: 125
Location: New Zealand
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q43 V45
GRE 1: Q161 V163
GRE 2: Q159 V166
GPA: 3.6
WE:Editorial and Writing (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 710 Q43 V45
GRE 1: Q161 V163
GRE 2: Q159 V166
Posts: 60
Kudos: 115
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yvonne0923
The beautiful cello solo at the end of the symphony may have salvaged the performance, for most of the orchestra members played poorly throughout the two hour concert.

A. for most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert.
B. in that most of the orchestra members performed throughout the two hour concert in a poor manner.
C. When most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert.
D. despite most of the orchestra members performing poorly throughout the two hour concert.
E. even though most of the orchestra members made a poor performance throughout the two hour concert.







________________________________________________________________________________________________

Question about choice E and A, what is the difference and why the phrase "made a poor performance" doesn't work here?

A. for most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert. Succint and the only one the conveys the meaning.
B. in that most of the orchestra members performed throughout the two hour concert in a poor manner. in that doesn't convey the meaning and is awkward.
C. When most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert. implies that at a certain point in time when the other members were performing poorly, the cello solo did well.
D. despite most of the orchestra members performing poorly throughout the two hour concert. Implies that despite the others performing poorly, the cello was able to do a great job. This means that the cello was able to perform well even though the remaining crew's poor performance was expected to perhaps distract the cello performers. Subtle change in meaning that makes this incorrect.
E. even though most of the orchestra members made a poor performance throughout the two hour concert. Similar to D....this implies that even though the others screwed up, the cello performers did well, as if the other's screwing up would generally impact the cello performers negatively.
User avatar
ydmuley
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2019
Posts: 814
Own Kudos:
1,001
 [2]
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The beautiful cello solo at the end of the symphony may have salvaged the performance, for most of the orchestra members played poorly throughout the two hour concert.

A. for most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert. - CORRECT - Usage of "for" is correct here

B. in that most of the orchestra members performed throughout the two hour concert in a poor manner. - incorrect usage of "in that" and wordy for "poor performance"

C. When most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert. - "when" is modifying performance, and is incorect

D. despite most of the orchestra members performing poorly throughout the two hour concert. - “despite most members performing poorly” is incorrect as it should be “despite the poor performance by...”

E. even though most of the orchestra members made a poor performance throughout the two hour concert. - “made a poor performance” is an unidiomatic and awkward way of saying performed poorly.

Hence, Answer is A
User avatar
kornn
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 361
Own Kudos:
82
 [1]
Given Kudos: 832
Posts: 361
Kudos: 82
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear AnthonyRitz AjiteshArun IanStewart GMATGuruNY DmitryFarber VeritasPrepBrian ccooley MartyTargetTestPrep GMATNinja,

Q1. Why is choice B. wrong?
"in that" is correct idiom (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/in%20that)

Q2. Why is choice C. wrong?
According to Merriam Webster (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/when), "when" means
Quote:
b: in spite of the fact that : ALTHOUGH
//quit politics when I might have had a great career in it
Q3. Why is choice E. wrong? Because of unidiomatic expression?
User avatar
emcheeks
Joined: 28 Jun 2020
Last visit: 30 Oct 2024
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 119
Kudos: 99
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kornn

This is what I found (by @prasi55)

"In that" is typically used when you have a general class of items/people and wish to emphasise attributes that are representative of that class or group.

For example. Humans are mammals in that they are warm-blooded. The latter part "they are warm-blooded" is a fact that is "representative" of all mammals. The portion following "in that" thus answers "in what way" humans are mammals.
User avatar
Vatsal7794
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Mar 2021
Last visit: 29 Oct 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
Posts: 237
Kudos: 123
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts

GMATNinja VeritasKarishma EducationAisle ChrisLele mikemcgarry AjiteshArun egmat sayantanc2k RonPurewal DmitryFarber MagooshExpert avigutman EMPOWERgmatVerbal MartyTargetTestPrep ExpertsGlobal5 IanStewart
other experts AnthonyRitz

What's the difference between A and D. I was confused between A and D but at last chose D as the answer.

Reasoning for D is - I thought sentence must talk about the "symphony may have salvaged the performance" for the overall orchestra performed and not for the individual members.

Can you please explain the reason?
User avatar
AnthonyRitz
User avatar
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
403
 [3]
Given Kudos: 166
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 237
Kudos: 403
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vatsal7794
Hi Experts

GMATNinja VeritasKarishma EducationAisle ChrisLele mikemcgarry AjiteshArun egmat sayantanc2k RonPurewal DmitryFarber MagooshExpert avigutman EMPOWERgmatVerbal MartyTargetTestPrep ExpertsGlobal5 IanStewart
other experts AnthonyRitz

What's the difference between A and D. I was confused between A and D but at last chose D as the answer.

Reasoning for D is - I thought sentence must talk about the "symphony may have salvaged the performance" for the overall orchestra performed and not for the individual members.

Can you please explain the reason?

The word "for" in this sentence is used as a conjunction meaning "because" and not as a preposition with the sense in which you described it.

The performance needed to be salvaged because the other orchestra members performed badly.

That said, the logic of this does feel slightly strange to me. The poor performances of the other orchestra members explain why the performance needed salvaging more so than why or how the solo actually did salvage things. So I don't love A... but there's often something you don't love in a right answer in 700-level sentence correction. I can live with this if we're not able to do better with any other answer.

...And no other answer works, in the end. In particular, the "fused participle" structure of D ("most of the orchestra members performing poorly") is incredibly difficult to read, awkward, and confusing. It's almost impossible to understand what's modifying what, or even what the actual noun is here. That's my biggest problem with that answer.

Here's the New York Times briefly discussing this issue: https://afterdeadline.blogs.nytimes.com ... -with-ing/
Here's another guide on the problematic structure: https://style.mla.org/fused-participle/

Google "fused participle" for a lot more on why the structure is often problematic.

In the end, it's not my favorite Veritas question, but, yeah, I'd pick A.
User avatar
JonShukhrat
Joined: 06 Jun 2019
Last visit: 01 Jul 2024
Posts: 313
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 655
Location: Uzbekistan
Posts: 313
Kudos: 979
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear AnthonyRitz

Thank you very much for the links. I enjoyed them.

I would be grateful if you could help clarify my doubts about “may have salvaged” ?

I went through several grammar websites and found out that these days “may have done” and “might have done” can be used interchangeably – that is, “may have done” can be used to talk about past events or situations that were possible but did not happen, and hence my confusion.

So, which of the following does the first clause mean?

1. There was a beautiful solo at the end, and there is a probability that it salvaged the performance.

2. There wasn’t a beautiful solo at the end, but if there were one, it could salvage the performance. Similar to “Tom didn’t come to the party. He may have made it more interesting.”

In both cases, choice A seems to make no sense. It doesn’t explain anything in them. However, choice E could work if the first meaning above is true.

E seems to say that even though the first two hours were bad, there is still probability that the solo saved the performance. What is wrong with this meaning?
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 16 Oct 2024
Posts: 5,129
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert reply
Posts: 5,129
Kudos: 4,703
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vatsal7794
Hi Experts

GMATNinja VeritasKarishma EducationAisle ChrisLele mikemcgarry AjiteshArun egmat sayantanc2k RonPurewal DmitryFarber MagooshExpert avigutman EMPOWERgmatVerbal MartyTargetTestPrep ExpertsGlobal5 IanStewart
other experts AnthonyRitz

What's the difference between A and D. I was confused between A and D but at last chose D as the answer.

Reasoning for D is - I thought sentence must talk about the "symphony may have salvaged the performance" for the overall orchestra performed and not for the individual members.

Can you please explain the reason?

Hello Vatsal7794,

We hope this finds you well.

As mentioned elsewhere in this thread, in this sentence "for" is a conjunction that illustrates a cause-effect relationship. By contrast, "despite" is a conjunction that conveys contrast; thus, Option D completely alters the meaning f the sentence.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 16 Oct 2024
Posts: 5,129
Own Kudos:
4,703
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert reply
Posts: 5,129
Kudos: 4,703
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JonShukhrat
Dear AnthonyRitz

Thank you very much for the links. I enjoyed them.

I would be grateful if you could help clarify my doubts about “may have salvaged” ?

I went through several grammar websites and found out that these days “may have done” and “might have done” can be used interchangeably – that is, “may have done” can be used to talk about past events or situations that were possible but did not happen, and hence my confusion.

So, which of the following does the first clause mean?

1. There was a beautiful solo at the end, and there is a probability that it salvaged the performance.

2. There wasn’t a beautiful solo at the end, but if there were one, it could salvage the performance. Similar to “Tom didn’t come to the party. He may have made it more interesting.”

In both cases, choice A seems to make no sense. It doesn’t explain anything in them. However, choice E could work if the first meaning above is true.

E seems to say that even though the first two hours were bad, there is still probability that the solo saved the performance. What is wrong with this meaning?

Hello JonShukhrat,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can resolve your doubts.

The intended meaning of this sentence is that there was a beautiful solo at the end, and there is a probability that it salvaged the performance because most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert. This construction is a bit awkward, but what the sentence is trying to convey is that the solo may have salvaged the performance, and the performance was in a position to be salvaged because most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
AnthonyRitz
User avatar
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
403
 [1]
Given Kudos: 166
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 237
Kudos: 403
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ExpertsGlobal5
JonShukhrat
Dear AnthonyRitz

Thank you very much for the links. I enjoyed them.

I would be grateful if you could help clarify my doubts about “may have salvaged” ?

I went through several grammar websites and found out that these days “may have done” and “might have done” can be used interchangeably – that is, “may have done” can be used to talk about past events or situations that were possible but did not happen, and hence my confusion.

So, which of the following does the first clause mean?

1. There was a beautiful solo at the end, and there is a probability that it salvaged the performance.

2. There wasn’t a beautiful solo at the end, but if there were one, it could salvage the performance. Similar to “Tom didn’t come to the party. He may have made it more interesting.”

In both cases, choice A seems to make no sense. It doesn’t explain anything in them. However, choice E could work if the first meaning above is true.

E seems to say that even though the first two hours were bad, there is still probability that the solo saved the performance. What is wrong with this meaning?

Hello JonShukhrat,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can resolve your doubts.

The intended meaning of this sentence is that there was a beautiful solo at the end, and there is a probability that it salvaged the performance because most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert. This construction is a bit awkward, but what the sentence is trying to convey is that the solo may have salvaged the performance, and the performance was in a position to be salvaged because most of the orchestra members performed poorly throughout the two hour concert.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team

Yep, I second this. The meaning here is that the beautiful cello solo definitely happened, and it maybe/probably was enough to salvage the performance overall. I don't see anything illogical or nonsensical about this.

The problem with E is (unfortunately) just the weird, unidiomatic "made a poor performance" (as opposed to the superior "performed poorly"). I don't like having to rely on that, but here we are anyway... Told you it wasn't my favorite Veritas question!
User avatar
Arindamad
Joined: 12 Aug 2019
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 72
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Leadership
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 25
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone give an elaborate explaination why E is incorrect?
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7108 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts