Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 01:58 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 01:58

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2015
Posts: 96
Own Kudos [?]: 46 [0]
Given Kudos: 57
GRE 1: Q158 V143
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Jan 2017
Posts: 127
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [0]
Given Kudos: 751
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2020
Posts: 66
Own Kudos [?]: 81 [0]
Given Kudos: 151
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.95
WE:Analyst (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Jan 2017
Posts: 127
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [0]
Given Kudos: 751
Send PM
First sold May 1, 1924, iodized salt that made its way in regular di [#permalink]
rheam25 I think in both the options the ing-modifier 'making' is ambiguous , it can refer to the action of 'sold' in the first phrase and action of 'found' in the second clause.
So the sentence would have been correct if we placed a conjunction between the modifiers.
Also for option B, modifier and modified entity must be placed close to each other
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7628 [1]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: First sold May 1, 1924, iodized salt that made its way in regular di [#permalink]
Top Contributor
Taulark1 wrote:
Hi Bunuel ,

Could you please help me out with why option E is wrong
I eliminated option E because of the following reason ->

(E) First sold May 1, 1924, iodized salt has made its way in regular diet to reduce the incidence of goiter, also playing

Reasons :
1) The 'also playing' is without a verb in the 2nd part of the sentence
2) 'Also playing' is not parallel with 'to reduce the incidence of goiter'

Are my reasons for eliminating option E correct ?


Hi

Let me try to address your query.

1) I am not sure why you feel there is no verb - "playing" itself is a verb that tells us what iodized salt did.
2) "Also playing" is problematic, but not for parallelism reasons. The problem is that it changes the intended meaning of the original sentence. The original sentence brings in an angle of discovery by using "found to play" which is completely omitted in "also playing...". Since there is no logical reason to change the meaning, and also looking at the other four options on this point, option (A) is better than option (E).

Please note, there is no problem with option (E) grammatically - the meaning issue is the problem. Hope this helps.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Oct 2021
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
Send PM
Re: First sold May 1, 1924, iodized salt that made its way in regular di [#permalink]
If A is the right answer, isnt there supposed to be a comma b/w goiter and has? AkashM AndrewN
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6860 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: First sold May 1, 1924, iodized salt that made its way in regular di [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
pranayraj98 wrote:
If A is the right answer, isnt there supposed to be a comma b/w goiter and has? AkashM AndrewN

Hello, pranayraj98. The original sentence does not need a comma because the relative clause, the one that begins with that, contains essential information and needs to resolve before we can get to the verb. If that were which and the information were considered non-essential, then yes, we would expect to see commas both before and after the relative clause.

Quote:
First sold May 1, 1924, iodized salt that made its way in regular diet to reduce the incidence of goiter has also been found to play a crucial role in brain development, especially during gestation.

The sentence follows a subject-relative clause-verb-participle construct. We are only interested in the earlier part, though, relative to your question. Consider a similar, simpler sentence. We would not write, The car that drove down the street, was black. I will say, nevertheless, that the GMAT™ takes a somewhat relaxed stance on comma usage, so unless you are positive that there is an error, you should probably look to other points of consideration to assess the merits of each option.

I hope this information proves useful to you. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17227
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: First sold May 1, 1924, iodized salt that made its way in regular di [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: First sold May 1, 1924, iodized salt that made its way in regular di [#permalink]
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne