Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 10:07 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 10:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vishumangal
Joined: 27 Jun 2015
Last visit: 22 Dec 2021
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
GRE 1: Q158 V143
GRE 1: Q158 V143
Posts: 91
Kudos: 49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Taulark1
Joined: 06 Jan 2017
Last visit: 15 Mar 2025
Posts: 122
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 750
Posts: 122
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
WarriorWithin
Joined: 14 Mar 2020
Last visit: 26 Feb 2022
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 151
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.95
WE:Analyst (Energy)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Taulark1
Joined: 06 Jan 2017
Last visit: 15 Mar 2025
Posts: 122
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 750
Posts: 122
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rheam25 I think in both the options the ing-modifier 'making' is ambiguous , it can refer to the action of 'sold' in the first phrase and action of 'found' in the second clause.
So the sentence would have been correct if we placed a conjunction between the modifiers.
Also for option B, modifier and modified entity must be placed close to each other
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,846
Own Kudos:
9,188
 [1]
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,846
Kudos: 9,188
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Taulark1
Hi Bunuel ,

Could you please help me out with why option E is wrong
I eliminated option E because of the following reason ->

(E) First sold May 1, 1924, iodized salt has made its way in regular diet to reduce the incidence of goiter, also playing

Reasons :
1) The 'also playing' is without a verb in the 2nd part of the sentence
2) 'Also playing' is not parallel with 'to reduce the incidence of goiter'

Are my reasons for eliminating option E correct ?

Hi

Let me try to address your query.

1) I am not sure why you feel there is no verb - "playing" itself is a verb that tells us what iodized salt did.
2) "Also playing" is problematic, but not for parallelism reasons. The problem is that it changes the intended meaning of the original sentence. The original sentence brings in an angle of discovery by using "found to play" which is completely omitted in "also playing...". Since there is no logical reason to change the meaning, and also looking at the other four options on this point, option (A) is better than option (E).

Please note, there is no problem with option (E) grammatically - the meaning issue is the problem. Hope this helps.
avatar
pranayraj98
Joined: 04 Oct 2021
Last visit: 03 Jan 2023
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If A is the right answer, isnt there supposed to be a comma b/w goiter and has? AkashM AndrewN
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,490
Own Kudos:
7,667
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,490
Kudos: 7,667
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pranayraj98
If A is the right answer, isnt there supposed to be a comma b/w goiter and has? AkashM AndrewN
Hello, pranayraj98. The original sentence does not need a comma because the relative clause, the one that begins with that, contains essential information and needs to resolve before we can get to the verb. If that were which and the information were considered non-essential, then yes, we would expect to see commas both before and after the relative clause.

Quote:
First sold May 1, 1924, iodized salt that made its way in regular diet to reduce the incidence of goiter has also been found to play a crucial role in brain development, especially during gestation.
The sentence follows a subject-relative clause-verb-participle construct. We are only interested in the earlier part, though, relative to your question. Consider a similar, simpler sentence. We would not write, The car that drove down the street, was black. I will say, nevertheless, that the GMAT™ takes a somewhat relaxed stance on comma usage, so unless you are positive that there is an error, you should probably look to other points of consideration to assess the merits of each option.

I hope this information proves useful to you. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,418
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,418
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
507 posts
361 posts