gregarious wrote:
This has been an interesting discussion about a potentially touchy subject. I personally find it interesting how, as an Asian-American, I am definitely considered a minority by the military but not by bschools or the Consortium. Actually, it would be more accurate to say that bschools don't consider Asian-Americans to be "under-represented minorities". I think RonMexico's advice to go with your gut is spot on. After all, regardless of what you're trying to convince the Consortium or an adcom of, it will show if you're not truly passionate about it, especially in person during an interview. Keep up the mature and insightful comments.
URM status is generally looked at differently by different "types" of schools (i.e. business, law, medical, etc.) as far as i know. for example, for business schools, they look at the following:
race X comprises 5% of all students in business schools, and
race X comprises 15% of the general population
since there is such a large disparity in these 2 figures, race X would be considered an "underrepresented minority" by business schools
if race Y (let's say asian-american) comprises 8% of business school students, and comprises 9% of the general population, then they would not be "underrepresented" in the same sense.
i don't have firm figures as to what the percentages are for all minorities / races. however, if you look this article (
https://www.usnews.com/articles/educatio ... dents.html), you can see that blacks, hispanics, and native americans make up less than 10% of students in business schools, while at the same time representing 28% of the general population. this is the reason they are considered "underrepresented", whereas other minorities (such as indian, chinese, etc.) are not.