warrior1991 wrote:
generis Can you help on this one. I got this wrong in my mock exam today.
I chose E. Comments above are saying that there is a parallelism issue. Is that so ??
Please help
warrior1991 , well, the good news is that you missed a hard question.
The posters above are correct. Option E is not parallel.
Nor is a conjunction. [That fact is easy to forget.]
Conjunctions pair equivalent things (noun phrases with noun phrases, for example).
Conjunctions are parallelism markers and join structures that are similar.
In option E, the phrases that follow
too hard and
too soft are not similar in structure and thus are not parallel.
(E) [G]ranitic soil is the ideal construction material for the tortoise because it is not
too hard, making burrowing difficult, nor too soft, so as to cause tunnels to collapse.
Granitic soil is the ideal construction material for the desert tortoise because
IT is
NOT
-- too hard,
making burrowing difficult,
NOR
-- too soft,
so as to cause [tunnels to collapse]
Nor, a conjunction, signals that the two things that
nor joins must be similar structures.
What structures do we have in option E? Essentially, an __ING phrase and an idiomatic clause of consequence that does not begin with an __ING word
making burrowing difficult -- anchored by
making, which in this case is a verb-like noun (in jargon, a "simple gerund." )
-- the structure is a participial phrase: [verbING] + [direct object] + [adverb]
so as to cause tunnels to collapse -- anchored by
so as to, which in this case is an idiom of consequence
-- the structure of
so as to is an idiomatic conjunction that leads to a clause of consequence: [so as to] + [infinitive] + [direct object] + [infinitive modifier]
Compare the anchors.*
So as to is definitely
not a verbING (a gerund).
Option E would be parallel if it were written in these two ways, the first of which is much better than the second:
. . . [the soil] is not too hard,
making burrowing difficult, nor too soft,
causing tunnels to collapse. . . [the soil] is not too hard, so as to make burrowing difficult, nor too soft, so as to cause tunnels to collapse
(
So as to as an idiom of consequence is rare. GMAC tends to use the construction in (A). )
Hope that helps.
*The anchors in Option A are similar.
Option A joins two parallel examples of the idiomatic structure So X that Y
so hard that it makes burrowing difficult
or
so soft that it could cause
[so] + [adjective] + [that] + [it] + [verb]
As others have mentioned, the verbs (makes and could cause) do not need to be parallel because meaning allows the verbs to be paired.
We can pair a simple present and a hypothetical: The building is sturdy and could withstand a monsoon.