varotkorn wrote:
Dear
AjiteshArun VeritasKarishma,
According to the passage,
Quote:
Some observers have attributed the dramatic growth in temporary employment that occurred in the United States during the 1980s to increased participation in the workforce by certain groups, such as first-time or reentering workers, who supposedly prefer such arrangements.
I interpret the above that certain groups lead to high temporary EMPLOYMENT. In other words, those groups
TAKE or ARE EMPLOYED by the temporary jobs offered
According to choice A,
Quote:
That the number of new temporary positions would decline as fewer workers who preferred temporary employment entered the workforce
I interpret the above that there is correlation between certain groups and the new temporary positions OPEN or OFFERED by employers.
Employers may very well
OFFER or seek many many new positions by advertising on newspaper or radio for example, but very few workers who prefer temporary employment are interested to enter the workforce.
This could mean that the demand may well exceed the supply for temporary labor.
Note that fewer workers who preferred temporary employment still mean few temporary ACTUAL EMPLOYMENT (but high temporary POSITION OFFERED)
Choice A. says nothing about employment, just the positions (open/offered).
Hi
varotkorn,
I think you're focusing on the end result of the entire process. We could instead look at the content of the correct option as a step towards the end result, and not the end result itself. To see why we should not (or more accurately, don't need to) consider the creation of open positions as the end result, let's look at what happens when we get an
increase in the number of jobs as the "end result" (all of this is from the perspective of the "observers"):
X (
N certain groups ↑) --------------------------------------------------> Z (
N filled positions ↑)
I think this is what you are trying to get at in your post, that the observers would, given X, expect Z. However, there is an
intermediate step as well:
X (
N certain groups ↑) -------> Y (
N open positions ↑) -------> Z (
N filled positions ↑)
That is, before we can get to "filled positions", someone must first create "open positions". Now, that X is expected to lead to Z does not mean that Y is not expected.
Both are expected (by the observers). Therefore, the correct option does not need to go all the way to filled positions. It is fine if it stops at open positions, because the observers are very likely to expect the number of open positions to increase (before some or all of those positions are filled).