It is currently 18 Dec 2017, 01:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 132

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2004, 17:49
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil fired power plants) is unchanged at thrity-five dollars.

Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?

a) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.
b) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased raw material costs for that equipment.
c) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.
d) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants.
e) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become economically viable.

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 132

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2004, 17:53

This is the part that I don't understand:
"Actual oil prices control how far, given the viability threshold, solar power is from economic viability but do not figure in the determination of the threshold, so choices A and E are incorrect."

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 683

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Dec 2004, 06:44

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 132

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Re: CR #153 Solar Energy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Dec 2004, 14:07
Hi. Thanks for the link. I guess the wordiness of the passage got me confused.

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Re: CR #153 Solar Energy   [#permalink] 18 Dec 2004, 14:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.