It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 06:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4420

Kudos [?]: 8428 [0], given: 102

The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2012, 11:59
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (00:53) correct 33% (01:09) wrong based on 317 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies to advertise directly to the physicians.
(A) both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies to advertise
(B) both to prohibit individual physicians to form financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies while forbidding the companies to advertise
(C) to both prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and also to forbid the companies from advertising
(D) both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies as well as to forbid the companies from advertising
(E) to prohibit both individual physicians to form financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies from advertising

For a full discussion of these idioms and this question, see:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/verbs-that ... -the-gmat/
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Kudos [?]: 8428 [0], given: 102

 Magoosh Discount Codes Economist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes Math Revolution Discount Codes
VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1377

Kudos [?]: 1675 [1], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Re: The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2012, 21:42
1
KUDOS
An easy A.
Basically the question about Idioms and I really doubt whether these types of questions are still asked in test.
Prohibit X from Y.
Forbid x to y.
"and also" is redundant.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1675 [1], given: 62

Intern
Joined: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 6

GMAT Date: 01-16-2013
GPA: 3.37
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Re: The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2012, 23:10
1
KUDOS
Prohibit: from
Forbid: to

__________________________________
Lets Kudos

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 6

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4420

Kudos [?]: 8428 [1], given: 102

Re: The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2013, 09:23
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
farhanc85 wrote:
I am not good with idioms so spotted the mistakes of words used in the options.

Dear farhanc85

http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idiom-ebook/

Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Kudos [?]: 8428 [1], given: 102

Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2011
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 44

Location: India
GMAT 1: 440 Q33 V13
GPA: 3
Re: The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2012, 03:53
+1 A

I selected this based on idiom BOTH x AND y

is this correct elimination ??
_________________

GMAT - Practice, Patience, Persistence
Kudos if u like

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 44

Intern
Joined: 22 Sep 2011
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 88

Concentration: General Management
Re: The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Dec 2012, 04:13
There are 2 Idioms on this questions:

1. Both X & Y (which eliminates B & D)
2. Prohibit X from Y (which eliminates C & E)

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 88

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Posts: 290

Kudos [?]: 192 [0], given: 130

Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 670 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.6
WE: Brand Management (Retail)
Re: The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2013, 04:08
I am not good with idioms so spotted the mistakes of words used in the options.

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
_________________

Cheers
Farhan

My Blog - Student for Life ( Oxford MBA)

Kudos [?]: 192 [0], given: 130

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10117

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Re: The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2016, 03:02
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 03 Apr 2016
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 31

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Re: The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2016, 04:10
Straight A

Sent from my SM-N910H using Tapatalk

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 31

Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2016, 09:34
Please help me, I am so frustrated with this section. I feel like it's all arbitrary sometimes. The correct answer is A and I chose C. I understand the idiomatic expression "both X and Y" is correct which is one of the issues with C. My bigger problem is how come in terms of parallelism how come "to prohibit" and "to forbid" are parallel but "forming" and "advertise" don't have to be parallel? Also as a side note: How come these words can stay in the infinitive form? I thought the Gmat dislikes the infinitive

The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies to advertise directly to the physicians.

(A) both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies to advertise

(B) both to prohibit individual physicians to form financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies while forbidding the companies to advertise

(C) to both prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and also to forbid the companies from advertising

(D) both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies as well as to forbid the companies from advertising

(E) to prohibit both individual physicians to form financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies from advertising

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Nov 2012
Posts: 593

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 45

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2016, 11:38
sislam04 wrote:
Please help me, I am so frustrated with this section. I feel like it's all arbitrary sometimes. The correct answer is A and I chose C. I understand the idiomatic expression "both X and Y" is correct which is one of the issues with C. My bigger problem is how come in terms of parallelism how come "to prohibit" and "to forbid" are parallel but "forming" and "advertise" don't have to be parallel? Also as a side note: How come these words can stay in the infinitive form? I thought the Gmat dislikes the infinitive

The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies to advertise directly to the physicians.

(A) both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies to advertise

(B) both to prohibit individual physicians to form financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies while forbidding the companies to advertise

(C) to both prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and also to forbid the companies from advertising

(D) both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies as well as to forbid the companies from advertising

(E) to prohibit both individual physicians to form financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies from advertising

When read the sentence you need to check whether idioms are used properly.

In our case idioms used are prohibit... and forbid...

Prohibit FROM -- Correct idiom
Forbid TO - Correct idiom

Now check which options have these...

Only option A has this...

Hope this clears the clouds...

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 45

Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2014
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 26

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: Haas '19
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 2.5
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2016, 12:01
In this question FDA enacted recent restrictions and these restrictions are for some purpose so we will ask question what is the purpose of these restrictions..

We got 2 i.e. To Prohibit ...... And 2nd one is To forbid .....

So whenever we see some action with purpose we use infinitive of purpose to + verb.

Thanks

Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 26

Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2016, 14:31
msk0657 wrote:
sislam04 wrote:
Please help me, I am so frustrated with this section. I feel like it's all arbitrary sometimes. The correct answer is A and I chose C. I understand the idiomatic expression "both X and Y" is correct which is one of the issues with C. My bigger problem is how come in terms of parallelism how come "to prohibit" and "to forbid" are parallel but "forming" and "advertise" don't have to be parallel? Also as a side note: How come these words can stay in the infinitive form? I thought the Gmat dislikes the infinitive

The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies to advertise directly to the physicians.

(A) both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies to advertise

(B) both to prohibit individual physicians to form financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies while forbidding the companies to advertise

(C) to both prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and also to forbid the companies from advertising

(D) both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies as well as to forbid the companies from advertising

(E) to prohibit both individual physicians to form financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies from advertising

When read the sentence you need to check whether idioms are used properly.

In our case idioms used are prohibit... and forbid...

Prohibit FROM -- Correct idiom
Forbid TO - Correct idiom

Now check which options have these...

Only option A has this...

Hope this clears the clouds...

I was asking specifically about the parallelism how come in terms of parallelism how come "to prohibit" and "to forbid" are parallel but "forming" and "advertise" don't have to be parallel? I understand the idiomatic portion

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3153

Kudos [?]: 3282 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2016, 10:05
sislam04 wrote:

I was asking specifically about the parallelism how come in terms of parallelism how come "to prohibit" and "to forbid" are parallel but "forming" and "advertise" don't have to be parallel? I understand the idiomatic portion

Th parrallel elements are "to prohibit" and " to forbid" - the parallelism structure does not have anything to do with the rest - "from forming" and "to advertise" has no bearing with the parallelism - appropriate prepositions and forms has to be used as necessary.

Would you say there is a parallelism error in the following sentence?

I love to play with my sister, sing in the rain and walk alone..... does the question arise why "with my sister", "in the rain" and "alone" are not parallel?

Kudos [?]: 3282 [0], given: 22

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4420

Kudos [?]: 8428 [0], given: 102

Re: The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2016, 16:41
sislam04 wrote:
I was asking specifically about the parallelism how come in terms of parallelism how come "to prohibit" and "to forbid" are parallel but "forming" and "advertise" don't have to be parallel? I understand the idiomatic portion

Dear sislam04,

I'm happy to respond to your question. I see that sayantanc2k replied, but I want to take a slightly broader view.

Students have a few typical misconceptions about parallelism. Fundamentally, students conceive of parallelism primarily as a grammatical structure. It is not. Parallelism is primarily a logical structure, and the matching grammar merely mirrors the underlying logic. Following this misconception, students mistakenly believe that parallelism means that the two branches have to be lockstep precision, matching down to the last detail. That's absurd. There only has to be enough grammatical matching to make the logical pattern clear.

Here's the OA of the question that I wrote:
The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit individual physicians from forming financial partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and to forbid the companies to advertise directly to the physicians.

How much has to match in parallelism? Only enough to make the logical pattern clear. The FDA had two purposes in enacting these restrictions, to prohibit something and to forbid something. These are both expressed as infinitives of purpose. Those two are in parallel, so they have to match, and they do: both are infinitives: "both to prohibit . . . and to forbid . . . " That's the parallelism, right there, between those two infinitives. That's it.

What happens after that high level matching is 100% irrelevant to the parallelism. Once the logical pattern of matching is established, the job of parallelism has been fulfilled, and it places no more requirements on the sentence.

More importantly, within the two infinitive clauses, we have to follow the rules of idioms. The verb "prohibit" idiomatically takes from + [gerund]. The verb "forbid" idiomatically takes the infinitive. When I designed this question, I specifically chose two verbs that would have two different idioms. For more help on idioms, see the free GMAT idiom flashcards. The requirements of parallelism never never never supersede the rules of idiom.

You see, two verbs in parallel could have different tenses, or one could be active and one passive, or one have a long modifying clause and the other not. It doesn't matter. Parallelism is not a mathematical pattern that forces every single element into a precise Procrustean pattern. Parallelism is a logical pattern, and the matching grammar need only make clear the logic, no more.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Kudos [?]: 8428 [0], given: 102

Re: The FDA enacted these recent restrictions both to prohibit   [#permalink] 08 Sep 2016, 16:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by