GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 23 Jul 2018, 01:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 124
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Dec 2017, 02:21
I am also with "D". But I have some doubt about using "in 1909" just after "Selma Lagerlöf became". I think sentence must be like below.
......, in 1909, Selma Lagerlöf became......
Help me to get out of this doubt.
Expert Post
Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3195
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2017, 03:35
devanshu92 wrote:
Hi Experts,

Though I got the answer correct I have a quick doubt regarding use of infinitive.
The original sentence says that "Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden"

Will it be correct to rephrase the above sentence as "Turning away from literary realism to writing romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden"

Just a silly doubt but it will clear my concepts about the use of infinitive.

Thanks in advance :-)


Case 1: Turning away from literary realism to write: here "to write" is an infinitive depicting a purpose - WHY the writer turned? - to write.

Case 2: Turning away from literary realism to writing: there is no infinitive in this case - the idiom "FROM X TO Y" is used; X = realism (noun) and Y = writing ( gerund - also a noun). Here no purpose is depicted - just that the writer turned from X to Y.

You may compare the second case to the following example frequently used at the end of personal letters:
"Looking forward to seeing you."
Here "to" is an ordinary preposition and "seeing" is a noun (gerund), the object of preposition "to". Using infinitive "Looking forward to see you" would be wrong in this case since NOT the purpose of looking forward is to see you. The object of "looking forward to" is "seeing you" - looking forward to WHAT? - seeing you.
Expert Post
Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3195
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2017, 03:46
reynaldreni wrote:
Please could you kindly explain why option C is incorrect.
Thanks.
(source gmatprep exam 2)



Meaning issue - In C the meaning implied may be that the first Swedish writer and Selma Lagerlöf are two different people.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Dec 2015
Posts: 14
Premium Member
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Feb 2018, 06:32
Hi Experts,
In SC, I have been following a rule that the pair "and' - "also" is redundant.
However, it seems to be incorrect after getting this question wrong.
Can someone please provide pertaining details of and-also.
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2090
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Feb 2018, 23:58
1
nikhilbhide wrote:
Hi Experts,
In SC, I have been following a rule that the pair "and' - "also" is redundant.
However, it seems to be incorrect after getting this question wrong.
Can someone please provide pertaining details of and-also.


Hi nikhilbhide ,

"X and Y" is normally used to indicate two different things. (if you said "the first woman and the first Swedish writer", without the "also", that would normally imply 2 different people)

"X and also Y" is normally used to bestow two descriptions on the SAME person or thing (notice that both of these descriptions are meant to describe Selma Lagerlof).

For more information , check https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... t5815.html
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2090
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2018, 00:21
Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who became the first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win the Nobel Prize for Literature.

(A) Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who became the first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win -- modifier error -- in 1909 after comma

(B) She turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and novelist Selma Lagerlöf in 1909 became the first woman as well as the first Swedish writer that won -- usage of AND changes meaning because the two things -- she turned away ... and she became the first woman are not independent ; usage of that to refer to writer (a person )

(C) Selma Lagerlöf was a novelist who turned away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and in 1909 she became the first woman in addition to the first Swedish writer winning -- what was she before she became the first women ; usage of in addition

(D) A novelist who turned away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, Selma Lagerlöf became in 1909 the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win -- Correct

(E) As a novelist, Selma Lagerlöf turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 becoming the first woman and also the first Swedish writer that won -- usage of that to refer to writer is incorrect

---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----


1.In option B , does She not refer to Selma Lagerlöf by virtue of parallelism(both are subjects) ?
She turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and novelist Selma Lagerlöf in 1909 became the first woman as well as the first Swedish writer that won

whereas in question in the link - https://gmatclub.com/forum/she-was-an-e ... s#p2041716

She was an educator, a builder of institutions and organizations, and a major figure in the Black church and secular feminist movements as well, so one of the best-known and most well-respected African Americans of the early twentieth century was Nannie Helen Burroughs.

She is the subject of the independent clause , but Nannie Helen Burroughs is an object of second independent clause . So , as per parallelism , she CANNOT refer to NHB ?

2. Also , if the subject of both the independent clauses is the same , i believe repetition of subject(pronoun) leads to redundancy and thus should be avoided ?

https://gmatclub.com/forum/joan-of-arc- ... l#p1104716

daagh wrote:
An important thumb rule to follow while handling compound sentences is the omission of the subject in the second IC, if the subject of first IC can fit in as well as the subject. Here the subject of both the ICs is Joan and hence you can drop the pronoun – she - in the second IC. The whole sentence will still be //. Secondly, the right idiom is to claim. Both these combinations, you find in choice D only



AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , mikemcgarry , egmat , sayantanc2k, RonPurewal , DmitryFarber , MagooshExpert -- please enlighten
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Posts: 147
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2018, 19:13
1
Skywalker18 wrote:


Hi Skywalker18!

Happy to help :-)

Skywalker18 wrote:
1.In option B , does She not refer to Selma Lagerlöf by virtue of parallelism(both are subjects) ?
She turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and novelist Selma Lagerlöf in 1909 became the first woman as well as the first Swedish writer that won

whereas in question in the link - https://gmatclub.com/forum/she-was-an-e ... s#p2041716

She was an educator, a builder of institutions and organizations, and a major figure in the Black church and secular feminist movements as well, so one of the best-known and most well-respected African Americans of the early twentieth century was Nannie Helen Burroughs.

She is the subject of the independent clause , but Nannie Helen Burroughs is an object of second independent clause . So , as per parallelism , she CANNOT refer to NHB ?


Unfortunately, parallelism doesn't work this way. The pronoun "she" is referenced before we know what it's referring to. Parallelism is irrelevant here -- the problem is that we don't know what "she" refers to. Just because they are both subjects does not mean that they are referring to the same thing. We could say "apples are red and grapes are green", and both clauses are in parallel, but that doesn't mean that apples = grapes. Similarly, if we say "they are red and grapes are green", it's totally unclear what we're talking about. Does "they" refer to "grapes" or something else, like "apples"? That's the problem here.

Skywalker18 wrote:
2. Also , if the subject of both the independent clauses is the same , i believe repetition of subject(pronoun) leads to redundancy and thus should be avoided ?

https://gmatclub.com/forum/joan-of-arc- ... l#p1104716

daagh wrote:
An important thumb rule to follow while handling compound sentences is the omission of the subject in the second IC, if the subject of first IC can fit in as well as the subject. Here the subject of both the ICs is Joan and hence you can drop the pronoun – she - in the second IC. The whole sentence will still be //. Secondly, the right idiom is to claim. Both these combinations, you find in choice D only


I've highlighted the key part here. It is correct to remove the repeated subject and replace it with a pronoun, but only in the SECOND clause (i.e., after the noun has already been mentioned). For example, say we have:

Apples are red and apples grow in Washington state.

In this case, the correct modification would be:

Apples are red and they grow in Washington state.

But it is INCORRECT to say:

They are red and apples grow in Washington state.

We can only switch to the pronoun AFTER the subject (apples) has been mentioned. We can't substitute the pronoun into the first independent clause.

Does that help clear things up here? If not, let me know :-)
-Carolyn
_________________

Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
V
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 1505
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2018, 21:38
1
The reply above has addressed most of your questions. I'll just add a quick point.

Skywalker18 wrote:
1.In option B , does She not refer to Selma Lagerlöf by virtue of parallelism(both are subjects) ?
This (pronoun reference through parallelism) is not really a "rule". Think of it as a "signal" (to the reader). Sometimes the parallelism helps your reader understand what you are trying to refer to. Sometimes it doesn't. For example:

It may not be the healthiest food, but chocolate remains part of his diet.

Here it is reasonably easy to understand that the it refers to chocolate.

In these situations, check whether there is a better option. Don't try to start solving a question by looking at pronoun ambiguity issues (ambiguity should be kept for later, after the more "sure" concepts).
_________________

Ascore Prep | Online | Bangalore

Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Posts: 147
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2018, 21:44
AjiteshArun wrote:
The reply above has addressed most of your questions. I'll just add a quick point.

Skywalker18 wrote:
1.In option B , does She not refer to Selma Lagerlöf by virtue of parallelism(both are subjects) ?
This (pronoun reference through parallelism) is not really a "rule". Think of it as a "signal" (to the reader). Sometimes the parallelism helps your reader understand what you are trying to refer to. Sometimes it doesn't. For example:

It may not be the healthiest food, but chocolate remains part of his diet.

Here it is reasonably easy to understand that the it refers to chocolate.

In these situations, check whether there is a better option. Don't try to start solving a question by looking at pronoun ambiguity issues (ambiguity should be kept for later, after the more "sure" concepts).

This is an important point. Thanks for clarifying! :-)
_________________

Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 310
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2018, 17:53
spriya wrote:
Source : GMATPrep Default Exam Pack

Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who became the first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win the Nobel Prize for Literature.

(A) Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who became the first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win

(B) She turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and novelist Selma Lagerlöf in 1909 became the first woman as well as the first Swedish writer that won

(C) Selma Lagerlöf was a novelist who turned away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and in 1909 she became the first woman in addition to the first Swedish writer winning

(D) A novelist who turned away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, Selma Lagerlöf became in 1909 the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win

(E) As a novelist, Selma Lagerlöf turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 becoming the first woman and also the first Swedish writer that won


Attachment:
SC01.jpg


MagooshExpert, egmat,

In option D....Selma Lagerlöf became in 1909 the first woman-- looks awkward to me. Isn't it awakward to say "someone became in 1909 the first woman ?

Thanks,
Amm
SC Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1711
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 4
WE: Analyst (Retail)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2018, 18:23
That's the only place available to place 'in 1909'. Placing 'in 1909' anywhere else in the sentence results in a meaning shift.

ammuseeru wrote:

In option D....Selma Lagerlöf became in 1909 the first woman-- looks awkward to me. Isn't it awakward to say "someone became in 1909 the first woman ?

Thanks,
Amm
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2090
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2018, 21:58
MagooshExpert wrote:
Skywalker18 wrote:


Hi Skywalker18!

Happy to help :-)

Skywalker18 wrote:
1.In option B , does She not refer to Selma Lagerlöf by virtue of parallelism(both are subjects) ?
She turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and novelist Selma Lagerlöf in 1909 became the first woman as well as the first Swedish writer that won

whereas in question in the link - https://gmatclub.com/forum/she-was-an-e ... s#p2041716

She was an educator, a builder of institutions and organizations, and a major figure in the Black church and secular feminist movements as well, so one of the best-known and most well-respected African Americans of the early twentieth century was Nannie Helen Burroughs.

She is the subject of the independent clause , but Nannie Helen Burroughs is an object of second independent clause . So , as per parallelism , she CANNOT refer to NHB ?


Unfortunately, parallelism doesn't work this way. The pronoun "she" is referenced before we know what it's referring to. Parallelism is irrelevant here -- the problem is that we don't know what "she" refers to. Just because they are both subjects does not mean that they are referring to the same thing. We could say "apples are red and grapes are green", and both clauses are in parallel, but that doesn't mean that apples = grapes. Similarly, if we say "they are red and grapes are green", it's totally unclear what we're talking about. Does "they" refer to "grapes" or something else, like "apples"? That's the problem here.

Skywalker18 wrote:
2. Also , if the subject of both the independent clauses is the same , i believe repetition of subject(pronoun) leads to redundancy and thus should be avoided ?

https://gmatclub.com/forum/joan-of-arc- ... l#p1104716

daagh wrote:
An important thumb rule to follow while handling compound sentences is the omission of the subject in the second IC, if the subject of first IC can fit in as well as the subject. Here the subject of both the ICs is Joan and hence you can drop the pronoun – she - in the second IC. The whole sentence will still be //. Secondly, the right idiom is to claim. Both these combinations, you find in choice D only


I've highlighted the key part here. It is correct to remove the repeated subject and replace it with a pronoun, but only in the SECOND clause (i.e., after the noun has already been mentioned). For example, say we have:

Apples are red and apples grow in Washington state.

In this case, the correct modification would be:

Apples are red and they grow in Washington state.

But it is INCORRECT to say:

They are red and apples grow in Washington state.

We can only switch to the pronoun AFTER the subject (apples) has been mentioned. We can't substitute the pronoun into the first independent clause.

Does that help clear things up here? If not, let me know :-)
-Carolyn


Hi Carolyn MagooshExpert , AjiteshArun - Thanks for your help.

I believe you missed my second question --


Skywalker18 wrote:
2. Also , if the subject of both the independent clauses is the same , i believe repetition of subject(pronoun) leads to redundancy and thus should be avoided ?

https://gmatclub.com/forum/joan-of-arc- ... l#p1104716

daagh wrote:
An important thumb rule to follow while handling compound sentences is the omission of the subject in the second IC, if the subject of first IC can fit in as well as the subject. Here the subject of both the ICs is Joan and hence you can drop the pronoun – she - in the second IC. The whole sentence will still be //. Secondly, the right idiom is to claim. Both these combinations, you find in choice D only



Joan of Arc, a young Frenchwoman who claimed to be divinely inspired, turned the tide of English victories in her country by liberating the city of Orleans and she persuaded Charles VII of France to claim his throne.

(D) persuaded Charles VII of France to claim his throne
The only difference between option A and D is the pronoun "She".

What i can infer is as per GMAT , repetition of the pronoun is redundant. Can we use this fact as a rule or only as a preference?
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2557
Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2018, 12:46
Skywalker18 wrote:

Joan of Arc, a young Frenchwoman who claimed to be divinely inspired, turned the tide of English victories in her country by liberating the city of Orleans and she persuaded Charles VII of France to claim his throne.

(D) persuaded Charles VII of France to claim his throne
The only difference between option A and D is the pronoun "She".

What i can infer is as per GMAT , repetition of the pronoun is redundant. Can we use this fact as a rule or only as a preference?




Hello Skywalker18,

Here is my response to few of your questions.

Skywalker18 wrote:

Joan of Arc, a young Frenchwoman who claimed to be divinely inspired, turned the tide of English victories in her country by liberating the city of Orleans and she persuaded Charles VII of France to claim his throne.

(D) persuaded Charles VII of France to claim his throne
The only difference between option A and D is the pronoun "She".



It is not so that repeating pronoun leads to redundancy in this sentence. There are two aspects to this usage.

1. If the sentence intends to present two actions performed by the same doer, then why to write the two actions in two different clauses. The concise manner to present that sentence is to mention the doer once and present the two actions in a parallel list. This is what Choice D does.

2. Two independent clauses cannot be connected just by and. This is the flaw the original sentence suffers from.

If a comma is added before and in the original sentence, then it will be a correct sentence.

Now in this sentence, there is no confusion as to what the pronoun she refers to because Joan of Arc is mentioned right in the beginning of the sentence, and there is no other female mentioned in the sentence that she can refer to.


However, in the Selma Lagerlof problem, Choice B seems to suggest that its talking about two different people because two actions by the same doer has been presented in two different clauses, and first the pronoun is mentioned and then Selma Lagerlof is mentioned in the sentence.

So we come back to the same point. If the sentence intends to present two actions performed by the same doer, then why to write the two actions in two different clauses. The concise manner to present that sentence is to mention the doer once and present the two actions in a parallel list.

The correct answer choice of this question presents a structure that incorporates all the information about Selma Lagerlof in an unambiguous manner. This is the characteristic of a correct answer choice. It should present information in clear and simple manner.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2090
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2018, 22:53
AjiteshArun wrote:
The reply above has addressed most of your questions. I'll just add a quick point.

Skywalker18 wrote:
1.In option B , does She not refer to Selma Lagerlöf by virtue of parallelism(both are subjects) ?
This (pronoun reference through parallelism) is not really a "rule". Think of it as a "signal" (to the reader). Sometimes the parallelism helps your reader understand what you are trying to refer to. Sometimes it doesn't. For example:

It may not be the healthiest food, but chocolate remains part of his diet.

Here it is reasonably easy to understand that the it refers to chocolate.

In these situations, check whether there is a better option. Don't try to start solving a question by looking at pronoun ambiguity issues (ambiguity should be kept for later, after the more "sure" concepts).


AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , mikemcgarry , egmat , sayantanc2k, RonPurewal , DmitryFarber , MagooshExpert -- please enlighten

It may not be the healthiest food, but chocolate remains part of his diet. -- in this case the pronoun IT comes before the noun chocolate . So , is there a rule that Pronoun CANNOT come before the noun(to which the pronoun refers) in the sentence ?

MagooshExpert wrote:

Apples are red and they grow in Washington state.

But it is INCORRECT to say:

They are red and apples grow in Washington state.

We can only switch to the pronoun AFTER the subject (apples) has been mentioned. We can't substitute the pronoun into the first independent clause.

Does that help clear things up here? If not, let me know :-)
-Carolyn

_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

SVP
SVP
User avatar
V
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 1505
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Apr 2018, 01:55
Skywalker18 wrote:
It may not be the healthiest food, but chocolate remains part of his diet. -- in this case the pronoun IT comes before the noun chocolate . So , is there a rule that Pronoun CANNOT come before the noun(to which the pronoun refers) in the sentence ?
No. It depends on the construction. For example, if we change my sentence to

(1) It may not be the healthiest food, and chocolate is hard to resist.
Here the reader cannot be expected to understand that the it is referring to chocolate. There is just no clear connection between the first clause and the second.

(2) It may not be the healthiest food, but chocolate remains part of his diet.
Note how we switched from and to but. Now, the reader can be expected to understand that the it refers to chocolate.

Two more sentences:
(3) Ajay arrived before time and he drove me home.
Here the he can be understood to be referring to Ajay.

(4) He arrived before time and Ajay drove me home.
Here the he is referring to someone not mentioned in the sentence.

Clearly, the "rules" that (a) a pronoun and noun will "match" as long as they are in the subject position of their respective clauses and (b) a pronoun can never come before the noun it refers to are not really rules that can be applied cleanly.

Again, I'll repeat what I said earlier: In these situations, check whether there is a better option. Don't try to start solving a question by looking at pronoun ambiguity issues (ambiguity should be kept for later, after the more "sure" concepts).
_________________

Ascore Prep | Online | Bangalore

Re: Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the &nbs [#permalink] 20 Apr 2018, 01:55

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 36 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.