hero_with_1000_faces wrote:
Thanks for your detailed answer andrew.
Still some confusion:
The question states that "which of the following is a reason that play therapists help disturbed children express their emotions?"
Ill try to reword the question stem - "Why do play therapists help children"
play therapy takes for granted the fact that, once aided in expression, children are able to resolve their anxieties themselves.
My confusion is when the This therapy do not appreciate something as much as they are supposed to (take for granted) i.e children can resolve issues once aided, how can it become a reason for the practitioners of such therapist to do so. Why would they do it ? they might do it, but the tone makes it as if it is not the reason.
Am I overthinking ? guess we shouldn't fret much on unofficial questions.
Hello again,
hero_with_1000_faces. I think you are getting caught up too much in a
connotation of the expression
take for granted. Many times, people do use it in reference to appreciation. In the context of this passage, however, the same expression is akin to
assumes, no appreciation insinuated. Read the line in question as follows, and I think the pieces will fall into place:
play therapy assumes that, once aided in expression, children are able to resolve their anxieties themselvesI understand how you could be confused if you thought that appreciation had something to do with the matter at hand. I would not call this overthinking, but misinterpretation. Such a usage of
take for granted is not as common as its appreciation-laden counterpart in everyday speech, at least not in the U.S.
If you have further questions, feel free to ask.
- Andrew
thanks a lot andrew, learning something new from you today. Very happy!