Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Either statement alone is sufficient to solve the question For statement 1) 2>1>-2>-3 where wx>yz. The answer is true for |w| > x2 > |y| > z2 . Sufficient.

Similarly for 2 assume some number such that the given condition is satisfied . The answer is false for |w| > x2 > |y| > z2.

Hence each statement alone is enough.
_________________

w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2?

(1) wx > yz (2) zx > wy

Good question. +1.

Answer to the question is neither E nor D, it's B.

w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2?

Given: \(w\), \(x\), \(y\), and \(z\) are integers and \(z>y>x>w\): --w--x--y--z-- Question: is \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\)?

Now, since \(z>y\), then in order \(|y|>z^2\) to hold true \(y\) must be negative and since \(y>x>w\), then \(x\) and \(w\) must be negative. So in order the answer to be YES, \(y\), \(x\) and \(w\) must be negative (notice that the reverse is not always true: they might be negative but the answer could be NO, but if answer is YES then they must be negative). So if we get that either of them is not negative then we could conclude that the answer to the question is NO.

(1) wx > yz --> the product of two smaller integers (w and x) is more than the product of to larger integers (y and z). It's possible for example that all but \(z\) are negative but even in this case we could have two different answers: If \((z=1)>(y=-2)>(x=-3)>(w=-4)\) --> in this case answer to the question "is \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\)?" will be NO; If \((z=1)>(y=-2)>(x=-3)>(w=-10)\) --> in this case answer to the question "is \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\)?" will be YES. Not sufficient.

(2) zx > wy --> \(y\) is positive, because if it's negative then \(x\) and \(w\) are also negative (since \(y>x>w\)) and in this case no matter whether \(z\) is positive or negative: \(zx<wy\) (if z>0 then zx<0<wy and if z<0 then the product of two "more negative" numbers w and y will be more then the product of two "less negative" numbers z and x, so again we would have: zx<wy). Thus we have that \(y\) must be positive, which makes \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\) impossible (as discussed), hence the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient,

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Oct 2012, 23:35

(2) zx > wy --> \(y\) is positive, because if it's negative then \(x\) and \(w\) are also negative (since \(y>x>w\)) and in this case no matter whether \(z\) is positive or negative: \(zx<wy\) (if z>0 then zx<0<wy and if z<0 then the product of two "more negative" numbers w and y will be more then the product of two "less negative" numbers z and x, so again we would have: zx<wy). Thus we have that \(y\) must be positive, which makes \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\) impossible (as discussed), hence the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient,

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.[/quote]

sorry but just trying to understand more in this option as this is really trick for me

if we plug z=4,y=3,x=2,w=1 then zx>wy seems positive & also if we plug z=4,y=1,x=-2,w=-3 then zx>wy fails.. so how we could say y is positive & proceed with option B.

sorry but just trying to understand more in this option as this is really trick for me

if we plug z=4,y=3,x=2,w=1 then zx>wy seems positive & also if we plug z=4,y=1,x=-2,w=-3 then zx>wy fails.. so how we could say y is positive & proceed with option B.

Please correct me if i am wrong

From z > y > x > w (given) and zx > wy (given) it follows that y must be positive. But it does not mean that if z > y > x > w and y>0, then zx > wy must hold true.

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Oct 2012, 10:02

I would have guessed it C on real Gmat and moved on ..... very difficult to answer in 2 mins and not a real Gmat question. But Bunuel explained it very well .
_________________

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Oct 2012, 12:21

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

Bunuel wrote:

breakit wrote:

(2) zx > wy --> \(y\) is positive, because if it's negative then \(x\) and \(w\) are also negative (since \(y>x>w\)) and in this case no matter whether \(z\) is positive or negative: \(zx<wy\) (if z>0 then zx<0<wy and if z<0 then the product of two "more negative" numbers w and y will be more then the product of two "less negative" numbers z and x, so again we would have: zx<wy). Thus we have that \(y\) must be positive, which makes \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\) impossible (as discussed), hence the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient,

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.

sorry but just trying to understand more in this option as this is really trick for me

if we plug z=4,y=3,x=2,w=1 then zx>wy seems positive & also if we plug z=4,y=1,x=-2,w=-3 then zx>wy fails.. so how we could say y is positive & proceed with option B.

Please correct me if i am wrong

From z > y > x > w (given) and zx > wy (given) it follows that y must be positive. But it does not mean that if z > y > x > w and y>0, then zx > wy must hold true.

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Oct 2012, 06:46

Bunuel wrote:

breakit wrote:

(2) zx > wy --> \(y\) is positive, because if it's negative then \(x\) and \(w\) are also negative (since \(y>x>w\)) and in this case no matter whether \(z\) is positive or negative: \(zx<wy\) (if z>0 then zx<0<wy and if z<0 then the product of two "more negative" numbers w and y will be more then the product of two "less negative" numbers z and x, so again we would have: zx<wy). Thus we have that \(y\) must be positive, which makes \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\) impossible (as discussed), hence the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient,

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.

sorry but just trying to understand more in this option as this is really trick for me

if we plug z=4,y=3,x=2,w=1 then zx>wy seems positive & also if we plug z=4,y=1,x=-2,w=-3 then zx>wy fails.. so how we could say y is positive & proceed with option B.

Please correct me if i am wrong

From z > y > x > w (given) and zx > wy (given) it follows that y must be positive. But it does not mean that if z > y > x > w and y>0, then zx > wy must hold true.

Hope it's clear.[/quote] Amazing explanation again, Bunnel. But can this be a real GMAT question?
_________________

The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a very mean and nasty place and I don't care how tough you are it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain't about how hard ya hit. It's about how hard you can get it and keep moving forward. How much you can take and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done!

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Nov 2012, 12:38

thanks Bunuel for excellent exp. But how realistic the question is from GMAT perspective? I re-attempted the question after reviewing your solution and still took me slightly more than 4 mins.

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jul 2013, 13:22

w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2?

(1) wx > yz

If wx>yz then w and x must both be negative and their absolute values must be larger than the values of y and z respectively. If w is the smallest number in the group (i.e. -10) but it's absolute value is the greatest (as it must be because wx>yz then |x|>|y| Also, x^2 and y^2 will both be positive.

However, we can't be sure if |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2? For example:

|w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2 |-14| > -3^2 > |-2| > 1^2 14 > 9 > 2 > 1 This is valid. So, y could be positive or negative but w and y must be negative and their absolute values must be greater than xy. INSUFFICIENT

(2) zx > wy

z > y > x > w Values are not all negative

z > y > x > w 5 > 4 > 3 > 2 zx > wy 15 > 8 VALID

z > y > x > w 5 > 4 > 3 > -2 zx > wy 15 > -8 VALID

z > y > x > w 5 > 4 > -2 > -3 -10 > -8 INVALID

Either all z, y, x, w are positive or z, y, x are positive and w is negative.

is |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2?

If z, y, x, w are all positive then |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2? cannot be true If z, y, x are positive and w is negative then |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2? still cannot be true: z > y > x > w 7 > 6 > 5 > -20

While I did get the question right, it took a while to do and I am not 100% positive if my methodology is correct. Could someone tell me if the way I solved it was correct?

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jul 2013, 14:12

3

This post received KUDOS

Different way of solving, not by plugging in numbers.

w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2?

(1) wx > yz

As opposed to plugging in numbers (which would take a very long time) we should try and analyze |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2 to see where it may or may not hold true.

One way for wx to be greater than yz (despite w and x being less than y and z on the number line) is for BOTH w and x to be negative. y could be positive or negative but z has to be positive. The other way is for all w, x, y, z to be negative.

|y| has to be greater than z^2 for the question to be true. If y is positive (and therefore, z is positive and greater than y) this isn't possible because a positive number (y) cannot be greater than the square of a larger number (Z) (assuming all values are integers which they are) If y is positive, the answer to the question is "NO"

If y is negative, (in which case z could be negative or positive) the question is possible. For example, if y=-3 and z=1, z would be greater than y but |y| would be greater than 1^2. This means the answer to the question could be "YES" In other words, it's possible that |y|>|z| but y<z. INSUFFICIENT

(2) zx > wy

We know that all z,y,x,w cannot be negative because zx < wy as opposed to the other way around. The only way for zx > wy is for all but w to be positive so:

If z is positive and we know that z,y,x are positive and x is negative then we know that |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2 never holds true. If z is greater than the other two positives (y and z) then there is no way z>2 will be less than |y| (because z cannot be a fraction as we are told all variables are integers) Therefore, this inequality fails every time regardless of values of y,x,w. SUFFICIENT

(B)

(p.s. are there any problems similar to this which I can practice on?)

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Jun 2014, 13:15

Bunuel wrote:

rohitgoel15 wrote:

w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2?

(1) wx > yz (2) zx > wy

Good question. +1.

Answer to the question is neither E nor D, it's B.

w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2?

Given: \(w\), \(x\), \(y\), and \(z\) are integers and \(z>y>x>w\). Question: is \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\)?

Now, since \(z>y\), then in order \(|y|>z^2\) to hold true \(y\) must be negative and since \(y>x>w\), then \(x\) and \(w\) must be negative. So in order the answer to be YES, \(y\), \(x\) and \(w\) must be negative (notice that the reverse is not always true: they might be negative but the answer could be NO, but if answer is YES then they must be negative). So if we get that either of them is not negative then we could conclude that the answer to the question is NO.

(1) wx > yz --> the product of two smaller integers (w and x) is more than the product of to larger integers (y and z). It's possible for example that all but \(z\) are negative but even in this case we could have two different answers: If \((z=1)>(y=-2)>(x=-3)>(w=-4)\) --> in this case answer to the question "is \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\)?" will be NO; If \((z=1)>(y=-2)>(x=-3)>(w=-10)\) --> in this case answer to the question "is \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\)?" will be YES. Not sufficient.

(2) zx > wy --> \(y\) is positive, because if it's negative then \(x\) and \(w\) are also negative (since \(y>x>w\)) and in this case no matter whether \(z\) is positive or negative: \(zx<wy\) (if z>0 then zx<0<wy and if z<0 then the product of two "more negative" numbers w and y will be more then the product of two "less negative" numbers z and x, so again we would have: zx<wy). Thus we have that \(y\) must be positive, which makes \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\) impossible (as discussed), hence the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient,

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel, It would be great if you could help me with this one thing. I love to solve question of inequalities using a number line approach. I plotted the number line thus

<----w-------x-------y--------z------> and read the question. For me the question translated to basically asking where is the 0 on this on number line in respect of y? Because |y| > z^2 only if y<0.

After that I simply told myself if I get options that state definitely where the zero is Ill chose it without definitely knowing the traditional solution. So I look at the options do a little imagination of the following sort :

1) wx>yz : This statement tells me (i) <------(w)---(x)--------------------------------------------------(0)---(y)--(z)--> (kind of to scale) or (ii) <-----(w)---(x)-----(y)---0----(z)--------->

w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2?

(1) wx > yz (2) zx > wy

Good question. +1.

Answer to the question is neither E nor D, it's B.

w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2?

Given: \(w\), \(x\), \(y\), and \(z\) are integers and \(z>y>x>w\). Question: is \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\)?

Now, since \(z>y\), then in order \(|y|>z^2\) to hold true \(y\) must be negative and since \(y>x>w\), then \(x\) and \(w\) must be negative. So in order the answer to be YES, \(y\), \(x\) and \(w\) must be negative (notice that the reverse is not always true: they might be negative but the answer could be NO, but if answer is YES then they must be negative). So if we get that either of them is not negative then we could conclude that the answer to the question is NO.

(1) wx > yz --> the product of two smaller integers (w and x) is more than the product of to larger integers (y and z). It's possible for example that all but \(z\) are negative but even in this case we could have two different answers: If \((z=1)>(y=-2)>(x=-3)>(w=-4)\) --> in this case answer to the question "is \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\)?" will be NO; If \((z=1)>(y=-2)>(x=-3)>(w=-10)\) --> in this case answer to the question "is \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\)?" will be YES. Not sufficient.

(2) zx > wy --> \(y\) is positive, because if it's negative then \(x\) and \(w\) are also negative (since \(y>x>w\)) and in this case no matter whether \(z\) is positive or negative: \(zx<wy\) (if z>0 then zx<0<wy and if z<0 then the product of two "more negative" numbers w and y will be more then the product of two "less negative" numbers z and x, so again we would have: zx<wy). Thus we have that \(y\) must be positive, which makes \(|w|>x^2>|y|>z^2\) impossible (as discussed), hence the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient,

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel, It would be great if you could help me with this one thing. I love to solve question of inequalities using a number line approach. I plotted the number line thus

<----w-------x-------y--------z------> and read the question. For me the question translated to basically asking where is the 0 on this on number line in respect of y? Because |y| > z^2 only if y<0.

After that I simply told myself if I get options that state definitely where the zero is Ill chose it without definitely knowing the traditional solution. So I look at the options do a little imagination of the following sort :

1) wx>yz : This statement tells me (i) <------(w)---(x)--------------------------------------------------(0)---(y)--(z)--> (kind of to scale) or (ii) <-----(w)---(x)-----(y)---0----(z)--------->

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Aug 2014, 05:36

enigma123 wrote:

w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2?

(1) wx > yz (2) zx > wy

Statement 1. Let's line up inequalities w<z x<y, if they are all positive we could get wx<yz by multiplying, but we have reverse that means that some of them negative or all negative. If all negative we should know the difference between integers. If w=-20 and x=-3, then |w|>x^2 but if w=-4 the result will be reverse. INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2. Let's line up inequalities z>y x>w, so we get zx>wy meaning that all numbers are positive. So we get that |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2 is impossible. SUFFICIENT

if |y| > z^2 then "y" must be negative{if it is positive then the distance[absolute value] of y cannot cannot be greater than z^2 }

so if we can determine that only(1) and (2) are possible OR they are not possible we can get our answer as "y" is negative in only (1),(2) and positive in (3),(4),(5)

STATEMENT 1

(1) wx > yz

according to this (1),(2),(3) are possible and (4),(5) are not possible

in order to get a definitive answer only(1),(2) can be possible or not be possible.As here (1),(2),(3) are possible so we cannot get a answer. INSUFFICIENT

STATEMENT 2

(2) zx > wy

according to this statement (1),(2) cannot be possible so this statement gives us a definitive answer as a NO that |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2? is not possible.

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is |w| > x^2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jan 2016, 11:25

Finally, i figured it out in 10 minutes.... It is a real matter of "negative, positive judgement of in-equation. And it also strongly tests your logical judgement. Very good one.

The four integers divide the number line into five parts. 0 could be anywhere on the five parts.

Question: is \(|w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2\)?

(1) wx > yz Think of the number line. When will the product of the 2 smallest numbers be more than the two largest numbers? Say, when all numbers are negative.

Now we can make a small change to this and get a No as answer. ------ (-10) -------- (-8) -------- (-5) ----- (-2) ------ Is \(|w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2\)? No.

So this statement is clearly not sufficient.

(2) zx > wy Now when will the product of the largest and third largest number be greater than the product of the second largest and the smallest number? That's easy, right? One case we can think of right away is when all numbers are positive. --------w------------x----------y---------z----------- --------1------------2----------3---------4----------- Is |w| > x^2 > |y| > z^2? No.

Let's now try to get a Yes case. When will \(|w| > x^2\)? w must be negative with a large absolute value. If x is 2, w must be -5 or smaller. Let's go on. Now \(x^2\) is already greater than |y|. But can |y| be greater than \(z^2\) in this case? No. For |y| to be greater than \(z^2\), y should be negative with a large absolute value (compared with z). So is it possible that w, x and y are all negative and z is positive or 0? No. In that case zx will be negative (or 0) while wy will be positive. Hence, it is not possible to get a "Yes" case. Sufficient.

Finally, i figured it out in 10 minutes.... It is a real matter of "negative, positive judgement of in-equation. And it also strongly tests your logical judgement. Very good one.

All said and done... I feel this question is not a GMAT like questions and is strictly a very difficult question even for practice of hard question of GMAT. in my opinion "A waste of time"
_________________

Prosper!!! GMATinsight Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha e-mail: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +91-9999687183 / 9891333772 Online One-on-One Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhi http://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.html