Jul 16 03:00 PM PDT  04:00 PM PDT Join a free live webinar and find out which skills will get you to the top, and what you can do to develop them. Save your spot today! Tuesday, July 16th at 3 pm PST Jul 16 08:00 PM EDT  09:00 PM EDT Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Tuesday, July 16th at 8 pm EDT Jul 19 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT The Competition Continues  Game of Timers is a teambased competition based on solving GMAT questions to win epic prizes! Starting July 1st, compete to win prep materials while studying for GMAT! Registration is Open! Ends July 26th Jul 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Jul 21 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Status: Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 463
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Dec 2011, 01:52
Question Stats:
28% (02:46) correct 72% (02:52) wrong based on 1641 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2 > y > z^2? (1) wx > yz (2) zx > wy
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Best Regards, E.
MGMAT 1 > 530 MGMAT 2> 640 MGMAT 3 > 610 GMAT ==> 730




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56244

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Feb 2012, 07:26
rohitgoel15 wrote: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2 > y > z^2?
(1) wx > yz (2) zx > wy Good question. +1. Answer to the question is neither E nor D, it's B. w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2 > y > z^2?Given: \(w\), \(x\), \(y\), and \(z\) are integers and \(z>y>x>w\): wxyzQuestion: is \(w>x^2>y>z^2\)? Now, since \(z>y\), then in order \(y>z^2\) to hold true \(y\) must be negative and since \(y>x>w\), then \(x\) and \(w\) must be negative. So in order the answer to be YES, \(y\), \(x\) and \(w\) must be negative (notice that the reverse is not always true: they might be negative but the answer could be NO, but if answer is YES then they must be negative). So if we get that either of them is not negative then we could conclude that the answer to the question is NO. (1) wx > yz > the product of two smaller integers (w and x) is more than the product of to larger integers (y and z). It's possible for example that all but \(z\) are negative but even in this case we could have two different answers: If \((z=1)>(y=2)>(x=3)>(w=4)\) > in this case answer to the question "is \(w>x^2>y>z^2\)?" will be NO; If \((z=1)>(y=2)>(x=3)>(w=10)\) > in this case answer to the question "is \(w>x^2>y>z^2\)?" will be YES. Not sufficient. (2) zx > wy > \(y\) is positive, because if it's negative then \(x\) and \(w\) are also negative (since \(y>x>w\)) and in this case no matter whether \(z\) is positive or negative: \(zx<wy\) (if z>0 then zx<0<wy and if z<0 then the product of two "more negative" numbers w and y will be more then the product of two "less negative" numbers z and x, so again we would have: zx<wy). Thus we have that \(y\) must be positive, which makes \(w>x^2>y>z^2\) impossible (as discussed), hence the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient, Answer: B. Hope it's clear.
_________________




Director
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 950

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 03 Feb 2012, 01:51
check with substitutions. a. let z,y,x,w be 1,2,8,10  100 we get yes and no for w = 10 and 100 respectively. Insufficient.
b. let z,y,x,w be 2,12,8,20 we get the same result for y= 1and 2 respectively.( y is positive otherwise the condition will not fulfill. Sufficient.
Thus B it is.
Originally posted by amit2k9 on 02 Feb 2012, 01:09.
Last edited by amit2k9 on 03 Feb 2012, 01:51, edited 2 times in total.



Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 180
Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Feb 2012, 05:24
Either statement alone is sufficient to solve the question For statement 1) 2>1>2>3 where wx>yz. The answer is true for w > x2 > y > z2 . Sufficient. Similarly for 2 assume some number such that the given condition is satisfied . The answer is false for w > x2 > y > z2. Hence each statement alone is enough.
_________________
+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks



Intern
Status: K... M. G...
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Posts: 31
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08272013
GPA: 3.8

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Oct 2012, 23:35
(2) zx > wy > \(y\) is positive, because if it's negative then \(x\) and \(w\) are also negative (since \(y>x>w\)) and in this case no matter whether \(z\) is positive or negative: \(zx<wy\) (if z>0 then zx<0<wy and if z<0 then the product of two "more negative" numbers w and y will be more then the product of two "less negative" numbers z and x, so again we would have: zx<wy). Thus we have that \(y\) must be positive, which makes \(w>x^2>y>z^2\) impossible (as discussed), hence the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient, Answer: B. Hope it's clear.[/quote] sorry but just trying to understand more in this option as this is really trick for me if we plug z=4,y=3,x=2,w=1 then zx>wy seems positive & also if we plug z=4,y=1,x=2,w=3 then zx>wy fails.. so how we could say y is positive & proceed with option B. Please correct me if i am wrong



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56244

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Oct 2012, 04:34
breakit wrote: sorry but just trying to understand more in this option as this is really trick for me if we plug z=4,y=3,x=2,w=1 then zx>wy seems positive & also if we plug z=4,y=1,x=2,w=3 then zx>wy fails.. so how we could say y is positive & proceed with option B. Please correct me if i am wrong From z > y > x > w (given) and zx > wy (given) it follows that y must be positive. But it does not mean that if z > y > x > w and y>0, then zx > wy must hold true. Hope it's clear.
_________________



Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 329

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2012, 08:44
Verrrry Very tricky..!!! ..got wrong . Thanks bunuel for such a nice explanation !!
_________________
Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !



CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2553
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31 GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2012, 10:02
I would have guessed it C on real Gmat and moved on ..... very difficult to answer in 2 mins and not a real Gmat question. But Bunuel explained it very well .
_________________
Fight for your dreams : For all those who fear from Verbal lets give it a fightMoney Saved is the Money Earned Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savingsGmat test review : http://gmatclub.com/forum/670to710alongjourneywithoutdestinationstillhappy141642.html



Intern
Status: K... M. G...
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Posts: 31
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08272013
GPA: 3.8

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2012, 12:21
Bunuel wrote: breakit wrote: (2) zx > wy > \(y\) is positive, because if it's negative then \(x\) and \(w\) are also negative (since \(y>x>w\)) and in this case no matter whether \(z\) is positive or negative: \(zx<wy\) (if z>0 then zx<0<wy and if z<0 then the product of two "more negative" numbers w and y will be more then the product of two "less negative" numbers z and x, so again we would have: zx<wy). Thus we have that \(y\) must be positive, which makes \(w>x^2>y>z^2\) impossible (as discussed), hence the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient,
Answer: B.
Hope it's clear. sorry but just trying to understand more in this option as this is really trick for me if we plug z=4,y=3,x=2,w=1 then zx>wy seems positive & also if we plug z=4,y=1,x=2,w=3 then zx>wy fails.. so how we could say y is positive & proceed with option B. Please correct me if i am wrong From z > y > x > w (given) and zx > wy (given) it follows that y must be positive. But it does not mean that if z > y > x > w and y>0, then zx > wy must hold true. Hope it's clear.[/quote] thanks a lot



Intern
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 32
Location: India

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Oct 2012, 06:46
Bunuel wrote: breakit wrote: (2) zx > wy > \(y\) is positive, because if it's negative then \(x\) and \(w\) are also negative (since \(y>x>w\)) and in this case no matter whether \(z\) is positive or negative: \(zx<wy\) (if z>0 then zx<0<wy and if z<0 then the product of two "more negative" numbers w and y will be more then the product of two "less negative" numbers z and x, so again we would have: zx<wy). Thus we have that \(y\) must be positive, which makes \(w>x^2>y>z^2\) impossible (as discussed), hence the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient,
Answer: B.
Hope it's clear. sorry but just trying to understand more in this option as this is really trick for me if we plug z=4,y=3,x=2,w=1 then zx>wy seems positive & also if we plug z=4,y=1,x=2,w=3 then zx>wy fails.. so how we could say y is positive & proceed with option B. Please correct me if i am wrong From z > y > x > w (given) and zx > wy (given) it follows that y must be positive. But it does not mean that if z > y > x > w and y>0, then zx > wy must hold true. Hope it's clear.[/quote] Amazing explanation again, Bunnel. But can this be a real GMAT question?
_________________
The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a very mean and nasty place and I don't care how tough you are it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain't about how hard ya hit. It's about how hard you can get it and keep moving forward. How much you can take and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done!



Intern
Joined: 06 Apr 2011
Posts: 13

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Nov 2012, 12:38
thanks Bunuel for excellent exp. But how realistic the question is from GMAT perspective? I reattempted the question after reviewing your solution and still took me slightly more than 4 mins.
Thanks:)



Senior Manager
Joined: 13 May 2013
Posts: 414

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Jul 2013, 13:22
w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2 > y > z^2?
(1) wx > yz
If wx>yz then w and x must both be negative and their absolute values must be larger than the values of y and z respectively. If w is the smallest number in the group (i.e. 10) but it's absolute value is the greatest (as it must be because wx>yz then x>y Also, x^2 and y^2 will both be positive.
However, we can't be sure if w > x^2 > y > z^2? For example:
z > y > x > w 4 > 3 > 6 > 10
w > x^2 > y > z^2 10 > 6^2 > 3 > 4^2 10 > 36 > 3 > 16 For obvious reasons, that isn't valid.
z > y > x > w 1 > 2 > 3 > 14
w > x^2 > y > z^2 14 > 3^2 > 2 > 1^2 14 > 9 > 2 > 1 This is valid. So, y could be positive or negative but w and y must be negative and their absolute values must be greater than xy. INSUFFICIENT
(2) zx > wy
z > y > x > w Values are not all negative
z > y > x > w 5 > 4 > 3 > 2 zx > wy 15 > 8 VALID
z > y > x > w 5 > 4 > 3 > 2 zx > wy 15 > 8 VALID
z > y > x > w 5 > 4 > 2 > 3 10 > 8 INVALID
Either all z, y, x, w are positive or z, y, x are positive and w is negative.
is w > x^2 > y > z^2?
If z, y, x, w are all positive then w > x^2 > y > z^2? cannot be true If z, y, x are positive and w is negative then w > x^2 > y > z^2? still cannot be true: z > y > x > w 7 > 6 > 5 > 20
w > x^2 > y > z^2? 20 > 5^2 > 6 > 7^2 20 > 25 > 6 > 49
(B)
While I did get the question right, it took a while to do and I am not 100% positive if my methodology is correct. Could someone tell me if the way I solved it was correct?



Senior Manager
Joined: 13 May 2013
Posts: 414

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jul 2013, 14:12
Different way of solving, not by plugging in numbers.
w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2 > y > z^2?
(1) wx > yz
As opposed to plugging in numbers (which would take a very long time) we should try and analyze w > x^2 > y > z^2 to see where it may or may not hold true.
One way for wx to be greater than yz (despite w and x being less than y and z on the number line) is for BOTH w and x to be negative. y could be positive or negative but z has to be positive. The other way is for all w, x, y, z to be negative.
y has to be greater than z^2 for the question to be true. If y is positive (and therefore, z is positive and greater than y) this isn't possible because a positive number (y) cannot be greater than the square of a larger number (Z) (assuming all values are integers which they are) If y is positive, the answer to the question is "NO"
If y is negative, (in which case z could be negative or positive) the question is possible. For example, if y=3 and z=1, z would be greater than y but y would be greater than 1^2. This means the answer to the question could be "YES" In other words, it's possible that y>z but y<z. INSUFFICIENT
(2) zx > wy
We know that all z,y,x,w cannot be negative because zx < wy as opposed to the other way around. The only way for zx > wy is for all but w to be positive so:
If z is positive and we know that z,y,x are positive and x is negative then we know that w > x^2 > y > z^2 never holds true. If z is greater than the other two positives (y and z) then there is no way z>2 will be less than y (because z cannot be a fraction as we are told all variables are integers) Therefore, this inequality fails every time regardless of values of y,x,w. SUFFICIENT
(B)
(p.s. are there any problems similar to this which I can practice on?)



Intern
Joined: 19 Apr 2014
Posts: 4
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jun 2014, 13:15
Bunuel wrote: rohitgoel15 wrote: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2 > y > z^2?
(1) wx > yz (2) zx > wy Good question. +1. Answer to the question is neither E nor D, it's B. w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2 > y > z^2?Given: \(w\), \(x\), \(y\), and \(z\) are integers and \(z>y>x>w\). Question: is \(w>x^2>y>z^2\)? Now, since \(z>y\), then in order \(y>z^2\) to hold true \(y\) must be negative and since \(y>x>w\), then \(x\) and \(w\) must be negative. So in order the answer to be YES, \(y\), \(x\) and \(w\) must be negative (notice that the reverse is not always true: they might be negative but the answer could be NO, but if answer is YES then they must be negative). So if we get that either of them is not negative then we could conclude that the answer to the question is NO. (1) wx > yz > the product of two smaller integers (w and x) is more than the product of to larger integers (y and z). It's possible for example that all but \(z\) are negative but even in this case we could have two different answers: If \((z=1)>(y=2)>(x=3)>(w=4)\) > in this case answer to the question "is \(w>x^2>y>z^2\)?" will be NO; If \((z=1)>(y=2)>(x=3)>(w=10)\) > in this case answer to the question "is \(w>x^2>y>z^2\)?" will be YES. Not sufficient. (2) zx > wy > \(y\) is positive, because if it's negative then \(x\) and \(w\) are also negative (since \(y>x>w\)) and in this case no matter whether \(z\) is positive or negative: \(zx<wy\) (if z>0 then zx<0<wy and if z<0 then the product of two "more negative" numbers w and y will be more then the product of two "less negative" numbers z and x, so again we would have: zx<wy). Thus we have that \(y\) must be positive, which makes \(w>x^2>y>z^2\) impossible (as discussed), hence the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient, Answer: B. Hope it's clear. Hi Bunuel, It would be great if you could help me with this one thing. I love to solve question of inequalities using a number line approach. I plotted the number line thus <wxyz> and read the question. For me the question translated to basically asking where is the 0 on this on number line in respect of y? Because y > z^2 only if y<0. After that I simply told myself if I get options that state definitely where the zero is Ill chose it without definitely knowing the traditional solution. So I look at the options do a little imagination of the following sort : < (6)  (3)  (2)  0 (2)(3) (6)> 1) wx>yz : This statement tells me (i) <(w)(x)(0)(y)(z)> (kind of to scale) or (ii) <(w)(x)(y)0(z)> Therefore, INSUFFICIENT. 2) zx>wy: (i)<(w)(x)(0)(y)(z) and I just know that B is sufficient to tell me where the zero is. A lot of this is based on intuition. I know it might not be the best strategy. However, it works for me. To further improve my skills w.r.t. this method please help me out by finding weaknesses in the reasoning and ways to improve it. It would be great.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56244

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jun 2014, 09:00
prashantgupta23 wrote: Bunuel wrote: rohitgoel15 wrote: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2 > y > z^2?
(1) wx > yz (2) zx > wy Good question. +1. Answer to the question is neither E nor D, it's B. w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2 > y > z^2?Given: \(w\), \(x\), \(y\), and \(z\) are integers and \(z>y>x>w\). Question: is \(w>x^2>y>z^2\)? Now, since \(z>y\), then in order \(y>z^2\) to hold true \(y\) must be negative and since \(y>x>w\), then \(x\) and \(w\) must be negative. So in order the answer to be YES, \(y\), \(x\) and \(w\) must be negative (notice that the reverse is not always true: they might be negative but the answer could be NO, but if answer is YES then they must be negative). So if we get that either of them is not negative then we could conclude that the answer to the question is NO. (1) wx > yz > the product of two smaller integers (w and x) is more than the product of to larger integers (y and z). It's possible for example that all but \(z\) are negative but even in this case we could have two different answers: If \((z=1)>(y=2)>(x=3)>(w=4)\) > in this case answer to the question "is \(w>x^2>y>z^2\)?" will be NO; If \((z=1)>(y=2)>(x=3)>(w=10)\) > in this case answer to the question "is \(w>x^2>y>z^2\)?" will be YES. Not sufficient. (2) zx > wy > \(y\) is positive, because if it's negative then \(x\) and \(w\) are also negative (since \(y>x>w\)) and in this case no matter whether \(z\) is positive or negative: \(zx<wy\) (if z>0 then zx<0<wy and if z<0 then the product of two "more negative" numbers w and y will be more then the product of two "less negative" numbers z and x, so again we would have: zx<wy). Thus we have that \(y\) must be positive, which makes \(w>x^2>y>z^2\) impossible (as discussed), hence the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient, Answer: B. Hope it's clear. Hi Bunuel, It would be great if you could help me with this one thing. I love to solve question of inequalities using a number line approach. I plotted the number line thus <wxyz> and read the question. For me the question translated to basically asking where is the 0 on this on number line in respect of y? Because y > z^2 only if y<0. After that I simply told myself if I get options that state definitely where the zero is Ill chose it without definitely knowing the traditional solution. So I look at the options do a little imagination of the following sort : < (6)  (3)  (2)  0 (2)(3) (6)> 1) wx>yz : This statement tells me (i) <(w)(x)(0)(y)(z)> (kind of to scale) or (ii) <(w)(x)(y)0(z)> Therefore, INSUFFICIENT. 2) zx>wy: (i)<(w)(x)(0)(y)(z) and I just know that B is sufficient to tell me where the zero is. A lot of this is based on intuition. I know it might not be the best strategy. However, it works for me. To further improve my skills w.r.t. this method please help me out by finding weaknesses in the reasoning and ways to improve it. It would be great. Yes, your logic makes sense. Notice that your solution is basically the same as mine.
_________________



Director
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 543

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Aug 2014, 05:36
enigma123 wrote: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2 > y > z^2?
(1) wx > yz (2) zx > wy Statement 1. Let's line up inequalities w<z x<y, if they are all positive we could get wx<yz by multiplying, but we have reverse that means that some of them negative or all negative. If all negative we should know the difference between integers. If w=20 and x=3, then w>x^2 but if w=4 the result will be reverse. INSUFFICIENT Statement 2. Let's line up inequalities z>y x>w, so we get zx>wy meaning that all numbers are positive. So we get that w > x^2 > y > z^2 is impossible. SUFFICIENT B



Intern
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 13
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 03142015

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jan 2015, 13:42
enigma123 wrote: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2 > y > z^2?
(1) wx > yz (2) zx > wy Given: z > y > x > w possible cases(as on a number line) for the above statement to be true wxyz0 (1)wxy0z (2)wx0yz (3)w0xyz (4)0wxyz (5) ASKED: Is w > x^2 > y > z^2? if y > z^2 then "y" must be negative{if it is positive then the distance[absolute value] of y cannot cannot be greater than z^2 } so if we can determine that only (1) and (2) are possible OR they are not possible we can get our answer as "y" is negative in only (1),(2) and positive in (3),(4),(5)STATEMENT 1 (1) wx > yz according to this (1),(2),(3) are possible and (4),(5) are not possible in order to get a definitive answer only (1),(2) can be possible or not be possible.As here (1),(2),(3) are possible so we cannot get a answer. INSUFFICIENT STATEMENT 2 (2) zx > wy according to this statement (1),(2) cannot be possible so this statement gives us a definitive answer as a NO that w > x^2 > y > z^2? is not possible. SUFFICIENT HENCE ANSWER is B please correct me if I'm wrong.



Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2015
Posts: 20
Location: United States
GPA: 2.5
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jan 2016, 11:25
Finally, i figured it out in 10 minutes.... It is a real matter of "negative, positive judgement of inequation. And it also strongly tests your logical judgement. Very good one.



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9433
Location: Pune, India

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Feb 2016, 05:25
enigma123 wrote: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2 > y > z^2?
(1) wx > yz (2) zx > wy Responding to a pm: When you see z > y > x > w, you could consider a number line: wxyz The four integers divide the number line into five parts. 0 could be anywhere on the five parts. Question: is \(w > x^2 > y > z^2\)? (1) wx > yz Think of the number line. When will the product of the 2 smallest numbers be more than the two largest numbers? Say, when all numbers are negative.  (100)  (8)  (5)  (2)  Here, wx > yz Is \(w > x^2 > y > z^2\)? Yes. Now we can make a small change to this and get a No as answer.  (10)  (8)  (5)  (2)  Is \(w > x^2 > y > z^2\)? No. So this statement is clearly not sufficient. (2) zx > wy Now when will the product of the largest and third largest number be greater than the product of the second largest and the smallest number? That's easy, right? One case we can think of right away is when all numbers are positive. wxyz 1234 Is w > x^2 > y > z^2? No. Let's now try to get a Yes case. When will \(w > x^2\)? w must be negative with a large absolute value. If x is 2, w must be 5 or smaller. Let's go on. Now \(x^2\) is already greater than y. But can y be greater than \(z^2\) in this case? No. For y to be greater than \(z^2\), y should be negative with a large absolute value (compared with z). So is it possible that w, x and y are all negative and z is positive or 0? No. In that case zx will be negative (or 0) while wy will be positive. Hence, it is not possible to get a "Yes" case. Sufficient. Answer (B)
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



CEO
Status: GMATINSIGHT Tutor
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 2959
Location: India
GMAT: INSIGHT
WE: Education (Education)

Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Feb 2016, 10:32
newconcept123 wrote: Finally, i figured it out in 10 minutes.... It is a real matter of "negative, positive judgement of inequation. And it also strongly tests your logical judgement. Very good one. All said and done... I feel this question is not a GMAT like questions and is strictly a very difficult question even for practice of hard question of GMAT. in my opinion "A waste of time"
_________________
Prosper!!!GMATinsightBhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha email: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +919999687183 / 9891333772 Online OneonOne Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhihttp://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.htmlACCESS FREE GMAT TESTS HERE:22 ONLINE FREE (FULL LENGTH) GMAT CAT (PRACTICE TESTS) LINK COLLECTION




Re: w, x, y, and z are integers. If z > y > x > w, is w > x^2
[#permalink]
03 Feb 2016, 10:32



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 29 posts ]



