Compared with southern New England's more developed beaches, Maine see

exactly ! didn't notice the change in meaning :s

Chose B. The only answer that seems to make any sense.

Compared with southern New England's more developed beaches, Maine seems like they have not dramatically changed in the past few centuries.

A) Maine seems like they have not dramatically changed in the past few centuries. - Incorrect - Illogical Comparison

B) Maine's seem not to have - Correct

C) Maine beaches seems like it has not - Incorrect - "like" is used for nouns

D) the beaches of Maine have not - Incorrect - meaning changes without seem

E) Maine seems as if it has[/quote] - Incorrect - Illogical Comparison

Hi chetan2u,
Isn't choice B's omitted part would be [developed beaches] rather than beaches?
Thanks

A C and E are wrong because they refer to Maine rather than to its beaches.
D changes the meaning. The sentence is supposed to say that it seems that Maine’s beaches have not changes, not that they definitely have not.

B is the correct answer.

Kaplan's explanation:

Read and look for errors:

The sentence compares "southern New England’s … beaches" to "Maine." These two items are not logically comparable, so the comparison is incorrect. A valid comparison would compare beaches to beaches, or states to states. Comparing a beach to a state, however, is illogical. Additionally, items compared must be in parallel form. The first item, "southern New England's...," uses the possessive form. The second item should do so as well.

Scan and group the answers:

Choices (A) and (E) compare "beaches" to "Maine." Choices (B), (C), and (D) compare "beaches" to "beaches," though using different language.

Eliminate wrong answers:

(A) and (E) can be eliminated for the incorrect comparison explained above. (C) refers to "Maine beaches,” which makes the comparison logical, but is not parallel to the original sentence's possessive "New England's..." (C) also uses the awkward and incorrect language, "seems like it has not." The pronoun-verb combination "it has" is referring to "beaches," which is plural. The proper wording would have been "they have," although the overall phrase would still be awkward. All of these reasons make (C) incorrect as well.

(D) refers to "the beaches of Maine," which makes the comparison logical. However, it is not parallel to the original sentence's possessive "New England's...". (D) also changes the meaning of the sentence. The original sentence says that the beaches "seem like they have not … changed," while (D) states that the beaches “have not … changed." The author only wants to state that the beaches appear to have remained the same, not that they truly have not changed "dramatically … in the past few centuries." Eliminate (D).

(B) is the only choice that compares logically similar items in a parallel structure, and does not distort the meaning of the sentence. (B) is correct.

TAKEAWAY: Don't focus solely on the underlined portion. The comparison here began way back at the very beginning of the sentence.

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.