GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 15 Aug 2018, 08:24

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Following several years of declining advertising sales, the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2012
Posts: 51
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2012, 23:46
1
1
Hi again,

We just need to know to verify : "After the reorganization, advertising sales increased."

The proportion of sales tells you nothing: it could be 100% of a very small amount or 0% of a huge amount. What we care is to know if the amount of sales from advertising has increased.

PS: I don't think the two questions you've posted are really at 700+ level...
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2008
Posts: 180
Schools: MIT / INSEAD / IIM - ABC

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2012, 04:02
Question Stem: In assessing whether the improvement in advertising sales can properly be attributed to the reorganization, it would be helpful to find out each of the following EXCEPT

It means all help EXCEPT means, which does not help "assess" - any option which is irrelevant to "assessment" will be the CORRECT choice

A: seems irrelevant - Contender for CORRECT choice
B: Substantial increase in last 2yrs help in evaluating the validity of argument
C: Has the workforce changed? So, again it is relevant
D: Before reorganization, was lack of knowledge was a challenge, relevant to evaluate
E: Has external factors changed - very relevant

So, A be it

Cheers
GODSPEED
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 172

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2012, 04:16
A. Two years ago, what proportion of the Greenville Times’ total revenue was generated by advertising sales? - Does not matter what percentage was the advertising sales in total revenue - Correct
B. Has the circulation of the Greenville Times increased substantially in the last two years? - This would help in knowing the impact of reorganization - Incorrect
C. Has there been a substantial turnover in personnel in the advertising sales force over the last two years? - Answer to this question would help if the increased sales can be attributed to workforce assigned to advertising sales - Incorrect
D. Before the reorganization, had sales representatives found it difficult to keep up with relevant developments in all types of businesses to which they are assigned? - Answer to this question would help understand the impact of reorganization of the sales force to individual business - Incorrect
E. Has the economy in Greenville and the surrounding regions been growing rapidly over the last two years? - This would help in the way business think about their product in the renewed economy - Incorrect
Senior Manager
Status: Now or never
Joined: 07 Aug 2010
Posts: 323
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 3.5
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2012, 00:48
2
venmic wrote:
Following several years of declining advertising sales, the Greenville Times reorganized its
advertising sales force two years ago. Before the reorganization, the sales force was organized
geographically, with some sales representatives concentrating on city-center businesses and
others concentrating on different outlying regions. The reorganization attempted to increase
the sales representatives' knowledge of clients' businesses by having each sales representative
deal with only one type of industry or of retailing. After the reorganization, advertising sales
increased. In assessing whether the improvement in advertising sales can properly
be attributed to the reorganization, it would be helpful to find out each of the
following EXCEPT:
A. Two years ago, what proportion of the Greenville Times’ total revenue was generated by
B. Has the circulation of the Greenville Times increased substantially in the last two years?
C. Has there been a substantial turnover in personnel in the advertising sales force over the last
two years?
D. Before the reorganization, had sales representatives found it difficult to keep up with relevant
developments in all types of businesses to which they are assigned?
E. Has the economy in Greenville and the surrounding regions been growing rapidly over the last
two years?

hovv is A the right ansvver hovv does it help to evaluate
vvhat is the reasoning behind it

Experts pls help

Following several years of declining advertising sales, the Greenville Times reorganized its
advertising sales force two years ago. Before the reorganization, the sales force was organized
geographically, with some sales representatives concentrating on city-center businesses and
others concentrating on different outlying regions. The reorganization attempted to increase
the sales representatives' knowledge of clients' businesses by having each sales representative
deal with only one type of industry or of retailing. After the reorganization, advertising sales
increased. In assessing whether the improvement in advertising sales can properly
be attributed to the reorganization, it would be helpful to find out each of the
following EXCEPT:
A. Two years ago, what proportion of the Greenville Times’ total revenue was generated by
B. Has the circulation of the Greenville Times increased substantially in the last two years?
C. Has there been a substantial turnover in personnel in the advertising sales force over the last
two years?
D. Before the reorganization, had sales representatives found it difficult to keep up with relevant
developments in all types of businesses to which they are assigned?
E. Has the economy in Greenville and the surrounding regions been growing rapidly over the last
two years?

For evaluation questions the answer to question in correct choice should either strengthen or weaken the argument, here its an except question so 4 choices to check for.

A) Keep on hold

B)If the circulation has increased then the increased sales could be attributed to circulation and not necessarily reorg. Weakens
C)If there is substantial turnover in person in Ad sales that means more people in sales have joined and as a result sales has shot up , reorg is not the necessary reason. Weakens
D)If sales rep found it difficult to grasp business concept that means reorg has actually benefited the sales , cause now representatives will work on their core areas. Strengthens
E)If economy has grown rapidly then one could attribute the increased sales to economic factors and not reorg. Weakens
_________________

Please press KUDOS if you like my post

Retired Moderator
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 506
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

Updated on: 22 Nov 2013, 11:30
1
New Gmat club project

_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Originally posted by WaterFlowsUp on 21 Nov 2013, 12:01.
Last edited by dentobizz on 22 Nov 2013, 11:30, edited 1 time in total.
updated theory articles
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Posts: 343
Location: United States
WE: Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2014, 06:17
1
Reasoning: re-organization -> advertising sales increased. Thus, The sales reorganization would NOT be likely the cause of the increased advertising revenue, if....(any answer choice that hurts the conclusion whether or not negated

A. Two years ago, what proportion of the Greenville Times’ total revenue was generated by advertising sales? Correct. If the proportion of advertising sales to total revenue were low, the only the absolute value of sales would count. Even if the proportion of advertising sales to total revenue were high, like 99%, still only the absolute value of advertising sales would count. Thus, this would not be helpful. I've noticed that GMAT frequently interchanges absolute value and percents.

B. Has the circulation of the Greenville Times increased substantially in the last two years? The sales reorganization would NOT be likely the cause of the increased advertising revenue, if the circulation has increased substantially.

C. Has there been a substantial turnover in personnel in the advertising sales force over the last two years? The sales reorganization would NOT be likely the cause of the increased advertising revenue, if there has been increased turnover in the sales force. The reorganization is already committed to the fact that a sales force designated to an industry would have more expertise. Thus, they would eventually bring in greater advertising sales.

D. Before the reorganization, had sales representatives found it difficult to keep up with relevant developments in all types of businesses to which they are assigned? Wrong - The sales reorganization would NOT be likely the cause of the increased advertising revenue, if the sales force did NOT have a difficult time to keep up with relevant developments.

E. Has the economy in Greenville and the surrounding regions been growing rapidly over the last two years? The sales reorganization would NOT be likely the cause of the increased advertising revenue, if the economy in Greenville has been growing rapidly.

It's important to use negation techniques so as to understand the answer choice with the least amount of impact.
IMO A.
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Posts: 343
Location: United States
WE: Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2014, 06:28
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
venmic wrote:
Following several years of declining advertising sales, the Greenville Times reorganized its
advertising sales force two years ago. Before the reorganization, the sales force was organized
geographically, with some sales representatives concentrating on city-center businesses and
others concentrating on different outlying regions. The reorganization attempted to increase
the sales representatives' knowledge of clients' businesses by having each sales representative
deal with only one type of industry or of retailing. After the reorganization, advertising sales
increased. In assessing whether the improvement in advertising sales can properly
be attributed to the reorganization, it would be helpful to find out each of the
following EXCEPT:
A. Two years ago, what proportion of the Greenville Times’ total revenue was generated by
B. Has the circulation of the Greenville Times increased substantially in the last two years?
C. Has there been a substantial turnover in personnel in the advertising sales force over the last
two years?
D. Before the reorganization, had sales representatives found it difficult to keep up with relevant
developments in all types of businesses to which they are assigned?
E. Has the economy in Greenville and the surrounding regions been growing rapidly over the last
two years?

hovv is A the right ansvver hovv does it help to evaluate
vvhat is the reasoning behind it

Experts pls help

Responding to a pm:

The argument boils down to this:
Advertising sales were declining. The paper reorganized the advertising sales team two yrs back. Advertising sales increased after reorganization. Now you want to figure out whether the increase actually happened due to the reorganization. So you need to evaluate what else could have caused the increase in sales. Say, if the lead of the sales team had changed 2 yrs back, it is possible that he is responsible for the increase in revenue rather than the reorganization. 4 of the 5 options will raise some such questions and the leftover option (which will be our answer) will have nothing to do with the increase in advertising sales.

A. Two years ago, what proportion of the Greenville Times’ total revenue was generated by
The proportion of advertising sales as a part of total revenue is immaterial to us. We only need to evaluate why the advertising sales increased. It is possible that the revenue from other sources has increased much more than the revenue from advertising sales and hence advertising sales could be smaller proportion of the overall revenue now but it doesn't matter at all. This option has nothing to do with the increase in advertising sales and hence, is the answer.
Let's take a look at all the other options too.

B. Has the circulation of the Greenville Times increased substantially in the last two years?
If the circulation increased substantially, that could have led to increase in advertising sales instead of the reorganization.

C. Has there been a substantial turnover in personnel in the advertising sales force over the last
two years?
If there has been a substantial personnel turnover, better people could have been hired which could have led to higher advertising sales instead of reorganization.

D. Before the reorganization, had sales representatives found it difficult to keep up with relevant
developments in all types of businesses to which they are assigned?
Did reorganization make keeping track of relevant developments easier? It can help us evaluate whether reorganization was responsible for the increase in sales.

E. Has the economy in Greenville and the surrounding regions been growing rapidly over the last
two years?
If the economy has grown rapidly in the past two yrs, it could have been responsible for the higher advertising sales instead of reorganization.

Hi,

I think you could have expanded C. The trap with C is that the answer choice and conclusion do not have a 1:1 relationship, the relationship requires some reasoning (i.e. a supporting assumption). The assumption is that the reorganized sales force has more knowledge in each industry. If the sales force has more knowledge of each industry, they are likely to attract more sales.
Intern
Joined: 25 Jan 2014
Posts: 16
Concentration: Technology, General Management

### Show Tags

15 Feb 2015, 08:51
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
venmic wrote:
Following several years of declining advertising sales, the Greenville Times reorganized its
advertising sales force two years ago. Before the reorganization, the sales force was organized
geographically, with some sales representatives concentrating on city-center businesses and
others concentrating on different outlying regions. The reorganization attempted to increase
the sales representatives' knowledge of clients' businesses by having each sales representative
deal with only one type of industry or of retailing. After the reorganization, advertising sales
increased. In assessing whether the improvement in advertising sales can properly
be attributed to the reorganization, it would be helpful to find out each of the
following EXCEPT:
A. Two years ago, what proportion of the Greenville Times’ total revenue was generated by
B. Has the circulation of the Greenville Times increased substantially in the last two years?
C. Has there been a substantial turnover in personnel in the advertising sales force over the last
two years?
D. Before the reorganization, had sales representatives found it difficult to keep up with relevant
developments in all types of businesses to which they are assigned?
E. Has the economy in Greenville and the surrounding regions been growing rapidly over the last
two years?

hovv is A the right ansvver hovv does it help to evaluate
vvhat is the reasoning behind it

Experts pls help

Responding to a pm:

The argument boils down to this:
Advertising sales were declining. The paper reorganized the advertising sales team two yrs back. Advertising sales increased after reorganization. Now you want to figure out whether the increase actually happened due to the reorganization. So you need to evaluate what else could have caused the increase in sales. Say, if the lead of the sales team had changed 2 yrs back, it is possible that he is responsible for the increase in revenue rather than the reorganization. 4 of the 5 options will raise some such questions and the leftover option (which will be our answer) will have nothing to do with the increase in advertising sales.

A. Two years ago, what proportion of the Greenville Times’ total revenue was generated by
The proportion of advertising sales as a part of total revenue is immaterial to us. We only need to evaluate why the advertising sales increased. It is possible that the revenue from other sources has increased much more than the revenue from advertising sales and hence advertising sales could be smaller proportion of the overall revenue now but it doesn't matter at all. This option has nothing to do with the increase in advertising sales and hence, is the answer.
Let's take a look at all the other options too.

B. Has the circulation of the Greenville Times increased substantially in the last two years?
If the circulation increased substantially, that could have led to increase in advertising sales instead of the reorganization.

C. Has there been a substantial turnover in personnel in the advertising sales force over the last
two years?
If there has been a substantial personnel turnover, better people could have been hired which could have led to higher advertising sales instead of reorganization.

D. Before the reorganization, had sales representatives found it difficult to keep up with relevant
developments in all types of businesses to which they are assigned?
Did reorganization make keeping track of relevant developments easier? It can help us evaluate whether reorganization was responsible for the increase in sales.

E. Has the economy in Greenville and the surrounding regions been growing rapidly over the last
two years?
If the economy has grown rapidly in the past two yrs, it could have been responsible for the higher advertising sales instead of reorganization.

Hi,

GOing by the Official guide 12 the correct answer to this question is B not A.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8184
Location: Pune, India

### Show Tags

15 Feb 2015, 22:42
arshu27 wrote:

Hi,

GOing by the Official guide 12 the correct answer to this question is B not A.

As far as I know, this is a GMAT prep test question and the answer given is (A). If it is in OG12 too, kindly put up a snapshot with the solution.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Save up to \$1,000 on GMAT prep through 8/20! Learn more here >

GMAT self-study has never been more personalized or more fun. Try ORION Free!

Current Student
Status: Applied
Joined: 02 May 2014
Posts: 154
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.35
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

15 Feb 2015, 23:44
Option A tells us about the proportion of total revenue which is clearly out of question what is important is that what might have caused the increase of sales.. hence option A is the correct choice..hope this helps
Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 187
Location: United States
Schools: Duke '20 (D)
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V27
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.2

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2015, 09:29
forgot about 'EXCEPT'. But yes, A was the obvious choice. That question would not help the evaluation.
Manager
Joined: 22 Sep 2015
Posts: 105

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2016, 14:01
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
arshu27 wrote:

Hi,

GOing by the Official guide 12 the correct answer to this question is B not A.

As far as I know, this is a GMAT prep test question and the answer given is (A). If it is in OG12 too, kindly put up a snapshot with the solution.

I am also seeing an OG answer of B. The answer explanation from the OG says: (B) This statement provides another possible explanation for increased revenue of advertising sales, and so the answer to this question would help to clarify the reason for the increased revenue.

For A (incorrect) the OG says: this question concerns only increased revenue from advertising sales; the proportion of advertising revenue to total revenue is outside the scope of the question

I also picked A and I'm a bit confused as to why the answer is B... could you please explain?
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8184
Location: Pune, India

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2016, 23:11
nycgirl212 wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
arshu27 wrote:

Hi,

GOing by the Official guide 12 the correct answer to this question is B not A.

As far as I know, this is a GMAT prep test question and the answer given is (A). If it is in OG12 too, kindly put up a snapshot with the solution.

I am also seeing an OG answer of B. The answer explanation from the OG says: (B) This statement provides another possible explanation for increased revenue of advertising sales, and so the answer to this question would help to clarify the reason for the increased revenue.

For A (incorrect) the OG says: this question concerns only increased revenue from advertising sales; the proportion of advertising revenue to total revenue is outside the scope of the question

I also picked A and I'm a bit confused as to why the answer is B... could you please explain?

As I suggested, please put up snapshot of the problem in OG. Does it have the word "EXCEPT" at the end? Is the question slightly different? Are the options exactly the same?
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Save up to \$1,000 on GMAT prep through 8/20! Learn more here >

GMAT self-study has never been more personalized or more fun. Try ORION Free!

Manager
Joined: 24 May 2016
Posts: 163

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2016, 13:55
venmic wrote:
Following several years of declining advertising sales, the Greenville Times reorganized its advertising sales force two years ago. Before the reorganization, the sales force was organized geographically, with some sales representatives concentrating on city-center businesses and others concentrating on different outlying regions. The reorganization attempted to increase the sales representatives' knowledge of clients' businesses by having each sales representative deal with only one type of industry or of retailing. After the reorganization, advertising sales increased.

In assessing whether the improvement in advertising sales can properly be attributed to the reorganization, it would be helpful to find out each of the following EXCEPT:

A. Two years ago, what proportion of the Greenville Times’ total revenue was generated by advertising sales?
B. Has the circulation of the Greenville Times increased substantially in the last two years?
C. Has there been a substantial turnover in personnel in the advertising sales force over the last two years?
D. Before the reorganization, had sales representatives found it difficult to keep up with relevant developments in all types of businesses to which they are assigned?
E. Has the economy in Greenville and the surrounding regions been growing rapidly over the last two years?

hovv is A the right ansvver hovv does it help to evaluate vvhat is the reasoning behind it

Experts pls help

Option A would be relevant if it asked about the proportion of advertising revenues out of total revenues two years ago and this year, for instance.

However, this option is only dealing with the percentage at a concrete point in time, so we cannot derive any possible conclusion about the evolution of the different components of total revenues (i.e. advertising and non-advertising revenues, for instance).
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8184
Location: Pune, India

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2016, 21:43
EBITDA wrote:
venmic wrote:
Following several years of declining advertising sales, the Greenville Times reorganized its advertising sales force two years ago. Before the reorganization, the sales force was organized geographically, with some sales representatives concentrating on city-center businesses and others concentrating on different outlying regions. The reorganization attempted to increase the sales representatives' knowledge of clients' businesses by having each sales representative deal with only one type of industry or of retailing. After the reorganization, advertising sales increased.

In assessing whether the improvement in advertising sales can properly be attributed to the reorganization, it would be helpful to find out each of the following EXCEPT:

A. Two years ago, what proportion of the Greenville Times’ total revenue was generated by advertising sales?
B. Has the circulation of the Greenville Times increased substantially in the last two years?
C. Has there been a substantial turnover in personnel in the advertising sales force over the last two years?
D. Before the reorganization, had sales representatives found it difficult to keep up with relevant developments in all types of businesses to which they are assigned?
E. Has the economy in Greenville and the surrounding regions been growing rapidly over the last two years?

hovv is A the right ansvver hovv does it help to evaluate vvhat is the reasoning behind it

Experts pls help

Option A would be relevant if it asked about the proportion of advertising revenues out of total revenues two years ago and this year, for instance.

However, this option is only dealing with the percentage at a concrete point in time, so we cannot derive any possible conclusion about the evolution of the different components of total revenues (i.e. advertising and non-advertising revenues, for instance).

_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Save up to \$1,000 on GMAT prep through 8/20! Learn more here >

GMAT self-study has never been more personalized or more fun. Try ORION Free!

Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 134

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2016, 21:43
This topic have been merged with: http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic-73545.html
Intern
Joined: 07 Dec 2016
Posts: 6
Schools: Cambridge Judge

### Show Tags

15 May 2017, 15:38
I understand the correct answer is A, but I still disagree, and would suggest E as the better answer, or at least equivalent in relevancy.. Here's my rationale.

A. Two years ago, what proportion of the Greenville Times's total revenue was generated by advertising sales?

Let's say before two years ago, the proportion advertising sales to total revenue was 1/100, after, it's 99/100. Bit drastic, but still valid. If I was analyzing the company as a potential investment, I would say the advertisement has had substantial effect. In other words, the question is relevant.

E. Has the economy in Greenville and the surrounding regions been growing rapidly over the last two years?

Does the economy really affect newspaper sales? Even in a bad economy, a few dollars a month for a newspaper subscription doesn't seem like such a big deal. The only relevance I from this option that I can determine, is that volatility increases viewership of financial news, and in periods of rapid growth (and decline), people are more interested in the news. However, that still seems like a far cry from the supposed information that A can give me.

I could be completely off, if that's the case, someone please correct me.
Manager
Joined: 03 May 2017
Posts: 108

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2017, 12:21
Tourbillion wrote:
I understand the correct answer is A, but I still disagree, and would suggest E as the better answer, or at least equivalent in relevancy.. Here's my rationale.

A. Two years ago, what proportion of the Greenville Times's total revenue was generated by advertising sales?

Let's say before two years ago, the proportion advertising sales to total revenue was 1/100, after, it's 99/100. Bit drastic, but still valid. If I was analyzing the company as a potential investment, I would say the advertisement has had a substantial effect. In other words, the question is relevant.

E. Has the economy in Greenville and the surrounding regions been growing rapidly over the last two years?

Does the economy really affect newspaper sales? Even in a bad economy, a few dollars a month for a newspaper subscription doesn't seem like such a big deal. The only relevance I from this option that I can determine, is that volatility increases viewership of financial news, and in periods of rapid growth (and decline), people are more interested in the news. However, that still seems like a far cry from the supposed information that A can give me.

I could be completely off, if that's the case, someone please correct me.

Hi, good points. the question can catch one off guard, (A) seems relevant to the evaluation, but on closer inspection, it's irrelevant.

I think (A) is relatively irrelevant because the passage already told us that sales increased and we are more concerned about the effect of reorganization on sales, rather than revenue. It might be relevant to know the numbers 2 years ago and now, to compare. However, the passage already told us what we needed to know, i.e that sale increased.

E is still relevant as it can help deduce whether the growing economy increased the sales rather than the reorganization. Remember we are talking about advertising sales, so it is businesses rather than individuals that needed to patronize the newspaper.
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2015
Posts: 1

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2017, 01:08
A is correct, as that information would not be sufficient because just knowing the proportion two years ago, will not give sufficient information to deduce whether the proportion is increased or not.
Re: Following several years of declining advertising sales, the &nbs [#permalink] 22 Jul 2017, 01:08

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 43 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.