Let's crack into it!
The passage revolves around Naomi's concern about obesity levels in young adults and her subsequent action to address it. She donates cookware to schools to promote better eating habits, believing that cooking at home can help. And, as a bonus for her kindness, she receives support from the community with some members purchasing from her store.
Now, let's go through the answer choices:
Quote:
A) The only way to reduce obesity is by eating home-cooked food.
The passage doesn't assert that home-cooked food is the sole solution. Naomi just believes it's a helpful approach.
Quote:
B) Educational session on cooking are the only way to encourage youth to eat healthier.
Again, the passage doesn't claim that cooking sessions are the sole method for healthier eating. It's just one of Naomi's strategies.
Quote:
C) Young adults are the group most likely to benefit from cooking programs.
Naomi is indeed concerned about obesity in young adults, but the passage doesn't say they're the "most likely" to benefit. This is a bit of a stretch.
Quote:
D) It is usually in one's best interest to perform actions that benefit others.
While a beautiful sentiment, this statement is too general. The passage focuses more on Naomi's specific scenario.
Quote:
E) Altruistic actions sometimes have positive consequences for those who perform them.
This hits the nail on the head! Naomi’s kind act of donating has a positive rebound effect, with members of the community supporting her business in return.
The best fit:
E) Altruistic actions sometimes have positive consequences for those who perform them.
It's like the universe giving a little wink and nod to good deeds. 😊 Hope that clarifies things!