BunuelHi. Newbie here.
My doubt one: If we are to take conclusion, should we include the causation, if "Therefore" is used, as part of the conclusion statement. In this case, it has "Therefore, the cake in Alex's ..... "
My doubt two: "Normally" doesn't itself means say around 70-80% of the time, i.e saying equivalent to most of the times, which means it includes sometimes it doesn't happen in a week or sometimes its early, it also depends on the type of refrigerator (prethinking here).
Doubt 3:C while it says the cake was freshly baked when it was placed in the refrigerator and not touched ever since doesn't give an idea on how much time it was there inside but condition when it was kept inside and there after, D clearly moves from Normally to Almost always (95% of refrigerators keep a cake fresh for a week), so isn't it D better choice while both strengthens, but D gives clear shift from normally to almost?
Thank you.
Regards.
Bunuel
Normally it takes a week for a cake to become moldy in a refrigerator. The cake in Alex's refrigerator is moldy. Therefore, the cake in Alex's refrigerator must be at least a week old.
Which of the following, if true, strengthens the conclusion?
A. Alex's refrigerator has not been cleaned in two years.
B. A blown fuse in Alex's building has deprived his refrigerator of electricity for the past five days.
C. The cake had just been baked when it was placed in Alex's refrigerator; it has remained there ever since.
D. A recent study demonstrated that 95% of refrigerators currently in use will keep a cake fresh for one week.
E. The cake was baked on a Tuesday.