Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 05:18 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 05:18

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 109
Own Kudos [?]: 182 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
GPA: 3.62
WE:Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Send PM
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [3]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Nov 2014
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V28
GMAT 2: 660 Q51 V28
Send PM
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 109
Own Kudos [?]: 182 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
GPA: 3.62
WE:Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
Expert Reply
lastminutemba wrote:
Thanks a lot Dmitry. I understand it now.


I have gone through the MGMAT SANAM pronouns. It is mentioned that None is not singular/plural and it will depend on the context of the sentence.

So in this sentence are is correct. - RIGHT?

None of the potential investors are expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger
agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.



lastminutemba -

Yes, your sentence is correct - and Dmitry did a far better job (more in depth) than I did. Good luck!
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [3]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
The subject is singular ‘one’ and therefore hence the verb should be ‘is’. Remove D and E.

A. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were - correct choice --- 1. using the right form of the verb is 2.using the correct idiom ‘to buy’ and 3. the past subjunctive verb ‘were’ for a hypothetical situation.

B. is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was – the wrong choice because of incorrect idiom and the use of simple past ‘was’

C. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were – Wrong because of the use of the present command subjunctive ‘ be signed’ and for using a pronoun’ them’ without a proper referent.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Feb 2016
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 30
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
Can someone explain why answer choice A as far as the use of "that includes" but not "that include"?

Thanks!
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [0]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were
The relative clause ‘that includes’ modifies a merger agreement. The agreement is singular. Hence, the singular ‘includes’
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 109
Own Kudos [?]: 182 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
GPA: 3.62
WE:Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Ashokshiva wrote:
Why is option B, not correct?

Pl. explain ]

thanks



Answer choice B is not correct because of the phrase "for buying". This portion is uses an incorrect idiom. "To buy" is the correct phrase.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Posts: 136
Own Kudos [?]: 169 [0]
Given Kudos: 178
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
GPA: 3.7
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
VeritasPrepDennis wrote:
Ashokshiva wrote:
Why is option B, not correct?

Pl. explain ]

thanks



Answer choice B is not correct because of the phrase "for buying". This portion is uses an incorrect idiom. "To buy" is the correct phrase.



Thanks for your explanation :) .

''if the deal were'' is used in option A while ''if the deal was'' is used in B.

how to i select between were & was in this qn?

pl. explain.

thanks
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2015
Posts: 38
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [1]
Given Kudos: 25
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
deal was or deal were?
I was under the impression that deal is singular in this particular context
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [2]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
KbSharma wrote:
deal was or deal were?
I was under the impression that deal is singular in this particular context

Hi! Indeed, deal is singular, but in the context that it is used here, the usage comes under hypothetical subjunctive.

In hypothetical subjunctive, the appropriate verb used is were, irrespective of whether the subject is singular or plural.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses subjunctive, its application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id, I can mail the corresponding section.
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Ashokshiva wrote:
VeritasPrepDennis wrote:
Ashokshiva wrote:
Why is option B, not correct?

Pl. explain ]

thanks



Answer choice B is not correct because of the phrase "for buying". This portion is uses an incorrect idiom. "To buy" is the correct phrase.



Thanks for your explanation :) .

''if the deal were'' is used in option A while ''if the deal was'' is used in B.

how to i select between were & was in this qn?

pl. explain.

thanks


Ashokshiva wrote:
Why is option B, not correct?

Pl. explain ]

thanks


If we want to describe a hypothetical event in future within an IF clause, we are required to use a hypothetical subjunctive case. The hypothetical subjunctive case takes a simple past form (although the event would or would not occur in the future). Only for the verb to be the hypothetical subjunctive becomes "were" instead of "was".

If I became the king, I would eradicate poverty. (verb: to become - hypothetical subjunctive used for an unlikely future event. form: simple past)
If I were the king, I would eradicate poverty. (verb: to be - hypothetical subjunctive used for an unlikely future event. form: simple past - but instead of "was","were" is used.)

Option B is incorrect, because simple past is used rather than a hypothetical subjunctive to indicate a hypothetical event.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2015
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 51 [0]
Given Kudos: 163
Location: Australia
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
Hi sayantanc2k
Sorry to bother.

A is easily the best option here, but is it not violating subjunctive rule?
If we use " if...were...to" structure, don't we need would be expected to make?

Please refer to this Magoosh blog
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gram ... ive-tense/

I'd appreciate if you could point out my flaw in understanding.

Cheers
RzS
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
TheRzS wrote:
Hi sayantanc2k
Sorry to bother.

A is easily the best option here, but is it not violating subjunctive rule?
If we use " if...were...to" structure, don't we need would be expected to make?

Please refer to this Magoosh blog
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gram ... ive-tense/

I'd appreciate if you could point out my flaw in understanding.

Cheers
RzS


Your point is valid for a complete IF...THEN.. structure for an unlikely case in future:

IF hypothetical subjunctive, THEN conditional (unlikely future case).

The construction in option A is not such a case - using hypothetical subjunctive does not necessarily call for a conditional would.

"Not one of the potential investors is expected" is NOT within a THEN clause corresponding to "IF the deal were...", and hence conditional is not required.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Status:Countdown Begins...
Posts: 242
Own Kudos [?]: 144 [0]
Given Kudos: 80
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
Hi sayantanc2k,

I have seen few comments on this topic and some people said that "they" or "them" used in option B and C does not have a clear antecedent.

I think in this case "they" or "them" refers to potential investors which is present in the propositional phrase. Even in e-gmat verbal chapters, it is said that pronoun can have antecedent in prepositional phrase.

Please correct me in my understanding if it is wrong, and are we striking down B and C only because they lack subjunctive mood or any other reason?
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
Expert Reply
RMD007 wrote:
Hi sayantanc2k,

I have seen few comments on this topic and some people said that "they" or "them" used in option B and C does not have a clear antecedent.

I think in this case "they" or "them" refers to potential investors which is present in the propositional phrase. Even in e-gmat verbal chapters, it is said that pronoun can have antecedent in prepositional phrase.

Please correct me in my understanding if it is wrong, and are we striking down B and C only because they lack subjunctive mood or any other reason?


A pronoun may refer to a noun which is an object of preposition.

Option B is wrong because of wrong usage of hypothetical subjunctive... should be "if the deal WERE" instead of "if the deal WAS".
Option C is wrong because of unnecessary usage of command subjunctive..... should be "a merger agreement IS signed " instead of "until a merger agreement BE signed".
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2017
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 56
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
Hi,

I am not getting how Option A is correct here... if you see clause "that...".. how come this clause modifies Noun Agreement? Ideally, it should modify preceding verb.

Also, I don't understand usage of Subjunctive here.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Dec 2014
Posts: 354
Own Kudos [?]: 171 [0]
Given Kudos: 150
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 3.85
WE:Design (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
Is the use of 'was' correct here? Can you please explain with examples the 'if X was/were' split?
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
DigitsnLetters wrote:
Is the use of 'was' correct here? Can you please explain with examples the 'if X was/were' split?


There are certain standard tense rules for IF.. THEN... constructions - the one relevant here is as follows:

An unlikely future event:
IF [hypothetical subjunctive], THEN [conditional].

IF I went to the professor, I would be ready with an answer.

The above sentence implies that most likely I will not go to the professor. But in case I go, I will be ready with an answer.

The verb "went" is in hypothetical subjunctive case (hypothetical subjunctive is always in simple past).
The verb "would be" is conditional.

Exception in hypothetical subjunctive: When the verb "to be" is used in hypothetical sunjunctive, "were" is used instead of "was".

If I was in power, I would first deal with corruption.... wrong
If I were in power, I would first deal with corruption... right
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
pratik1709 wrote:
Hi,

I am not getting how Option A is correct here... if you see clause "that...".. how come this clause modifies Noun Agreement? Ideally, it should modify preceding verb.

Also, I don't understand usage of Subjunctive here.


Your query 1:
There are certain standard exceptions to the modifier touch rule. They are well explained in Manhattan SC guide. This particular example falls under one of those exceptions mentioned:

If the predicate of a sentence is short while the modifier of the subject is too long compared to the predicate, then the predicate may come in between the subject and its modifier.

Your query 2:
The hypothetical subjunctive is used for an unlikely event in future: not concluding the deal is such an event. You might notice that all the options use hypothetical subjunctive (simple past form) - however for the verb "to be", the form "were" instead of "was" is used for hypothetical subjunctive.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy [#permalink]
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne