Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:40 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:40
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   4 
avatar
sanjeevsinha082
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2020
Last visit: 22 Sep 2021
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
11
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
Posts: 44
Kudos: 11
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 29 Jun 2021, 02:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Correct
B. 'for buying' is the incorrect idiom. Also, hypothetical subjunctive requires 'if ...were'.
C. Usage of 'be signed' is incorrect. Also, 'them' cannot refer to the 'Bank', which makes this
sentence incorrect.
D. 'Not one of ' is singular. Also, hypothetical subjunctive requires 'if ...were'.
E. 'Not one of ' is singular.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,783
 [3]
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 15 Oct 2021, 08:51
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jrk23
hello Sir,

Could you please explain about the use of singular or plural verb.

"Not one of X" or "not one of Xs (plural)" or "none of the X" "none of the Xs"...

Please let me know what should follow after these mentioned above.

thanku Sir :)
Show more
First, let's compare "one of..." and "not one of...":

  • "One of the CEOs is a thief." - We use a singular verb ("is") since the subject is one single CEO.
  • "Not one of the CEOs is a thief." - In the previous example, we were basically saying, "There is one single CEO who is a thief." Now we are saying, "There is no single CEO who is a thief."

When we use "each" (i.e. "Each CEO is a thief."), we are talking about each CEO individually. (CEO #1 is a thief. CEO #2 is a thief. CEO #3 is a thief. Etc.). A "not only" construction is similar, only negative (CEO #1 is NOT a thief. CEO #2 is NOT a thief. CEO #3 is NOT a thief. Etc.). Since we're referring to every individual CEO, a singular verb makes sense.

"None" is a bit trickier, as explained in this excellent post by EducationAisle. If you see an official example where you have to decide whether "none" is singular or plural, let us know! Until then, I wouldn't worry about it too much. :)

I hope that helps!
avatar
smackmyface
avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 10 Dec 2021
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 23
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 16 Oct 2021, 00:47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATNinja can you please explain why Option A is correct here ('that' modifier placed right after a verb), while in this question https://gmatclub.com/forum/because-an-oversupply-of-computer-chips-has-sent-prices-plunging-64392.html, Option C is wrong ('which' modifier placed right after a verb)?

Thanks!
User avatar
Aannie
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2014
Last visit: 13 Jul 2022
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
2
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
Schools: IMD '22 ISB '23
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
Schools: IMD '22 ISB '23
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
Posts: 32
Kudos: 2
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 16 Nov 2021, 09:57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatwhiz GMATNinja egmat can you please post detailed explanation for this question ?
User avatar
Aannie
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2014
Last visit: 13 Jul 2022
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
2
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
Schools: IMD '22 ISB '23
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
Schools: IMD '22 ISB '23
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
Posts: 32
Kudos: 2
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 16 Nov 2021, 09:58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatwhiz GMATNinja egmat can you please post detailed explanation for this question ?
User avatar
Aannie
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2014
Last visit: 13 Jul 2022
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
2
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
Schools: IMD '22 ISB '23
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
Schools: IMD '22 ISB '23
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
Posts: 32
Kudos: 2
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 16 Nov 2021, 10:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
did not understand why were and not was ? egmat GMATNinja
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,765
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 17 Nov 2021, 04:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Aannie
did not understand why were and not was ? egmat GMATNinja
Show more

Hello Aannie,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can resolve your doubts.

Here, the use of "were" is correct in reference to the singular noun "deal", as the subjunctive mood is in use; the phrase "if the deal were not to be concluded" refers to a hypothetical scenario, so the subjunctive mood is preferred, and this sentence uses the construction “wishful trigger (if) + plural form of the verb (were)”.

Remember, “wishful trigger (if) + plural form of the verb” is a correct, subjunctive usage; for example: "If I were an athlete, I would be super fit.". In an imaginative context, subjunctive mood is a preferred usage for conveying the intended meaning effectively.

To understand the concept of "Subjunctive Mood" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~20 minutes):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 950
Own Kudos:
208
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 950
Kudos: 208
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 17 Nov 2021, 06:44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chunjuwu
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.e
Show more


(A) is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were
The meaning is perfect therefore let us hang on to it

(B) is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was
they is not having the right reference therefore out

(C) is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were
be sign by them of style and not making much sense therefore out

(D) are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was
it isn't the right reference therefore out

(E) are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were
Similar reasoning as B

THerefore IMO A
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,783
 [1]
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 18 Nov 2021, 16:37
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Aannie
gmatwhiz GMATNinja egmat can you please post detailed explanation for this question ?
Show more
This one gives us some juicy decision points. First, we need to determine if the main verb of the first clause is "is" or "are." The subject here is "not one," which is singular, so we want "is." Kill (D) and (E).

Next, we need to determine if the main verb of the second clause is "was" or "were." Because we see "if" we know we're talking about a hypothetical case, meaning we want "were." So (B) is out.

In (C), we get the phrase, "signed by them." We know that "them" must refer to a plural noun, but there's nothing here that will work. The only earlier noun that seems to be a candidate is "investors," but that doesn't make sense. How could investors sign a merger agreement before they invested in that same merger?

It makes far more sense to suggest that someone else is signing the merger agreement. This is what we get in (A), which gets rid of the pronoun entirely. So (A) is our winner.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
tkorzhan1995
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2021
Last visit: 30 Aug 2022
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
16
Given Kudos: 22
Location: Canada
Posts: 132
Kudos: 16
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 15 Dec 2021, 13:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja, can you please help to explain the usage of past tense ''if they were''. I did not pick ans choice A right away because of the usage of past tense in ''if they were''. Past tense does not match to present tense used in the previous clause.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,765
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 16 Dec 2021, 07:15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tkorzhan1995
GMATNinja, can you please help to explain the usage of past tense ''if they were''. I did not pick ans choice A right away because of the usage of past tense in ''if they were''. Past tense does not match to present tense used in the previous clause.
Show more

Hello tkorzhan1995,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can resolve your doubt.

The past tense verb "were" is correct here, as it is part of a conditional phrase "if the deal were not to be concluded" that refers to the noun "penalties"; logically, "penalties" would be incurred only after the deal was not concluded, so from the perspective of the "penalties", this action is in the past.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
tkorzhan1995
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2021
Last visit: 30 Aug 2022
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
16
Given Kudos: 22
Location: Canada
Posts: 132
Kudos: 16
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 17 Dec 2021, 10:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ExpertsGlobal5, why if it is referring back to penalties, past tense should be used?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,783
 [1]
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 17 Dec 2021, 11:03
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tkorzhan1995
GMATNinja, can you please help to explain the usage of past tense ''if they were''. I did not pick ans choice A right away because of the usage of past tense in ''if they were''. Past tense does not match to present tense used in the previous clause.
Show more
It's perfectly reasonable to change verb tense in a sentence, so long as the tense shift is logical.

For instance:

    "Tim loses his mind when he discovers muddy footprints that were tracked all over the kitchen by his feral children."

Notice that the verb in the first clause, loses, is present tense, and the verb in the modifier, "were tracked" is past tense. But that makes sense here. The present-tense action is a generality, giving us info about how Tim responds in a certain situation. The past-tense action is part of a modifier describing "footprints," and it seems reasonable to write about footprints that were tracked in the past. So this is fine.

Same deal in (A). The first clause in (A) is about present expectations, so we want the verb to capture this. And "If they were" is part of a modifier describing "agreements." Because this modifier offers a hypothetical scenario, "were" is appropriate here.

The takeaway: there's no rule that we can't have multiple tenses in one sentence! Just make sure that the tense shifts make sense when you see them.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,765
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 19 Dec 2021, 05:59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tkorzhan1995
ExpertsGlobal5, why if it is referring back to penalties, past tense should be used?
Show more

Hello tkorzhan1995,

We hope this finds you well.

The past tense must be used because the penalties would only be incurred after the deal was not concluded; thus, when talking about the penalties, it is assumed that the hypothetical situation of the deal not concluding has already occurred, meaning past tense must be used to refer to the action.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
rdrdrd1201
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2019
Last visit: 10 Jun 2024
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
11
Given Kudos: 15
Schools: HBS '26 (A) Wharton '26 (D) Booth '26 (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: HBS '26 (A) Wharton '26 (D) Booth '26 (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 44
Kudos: 11
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 16 Jun 2022, 04:29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi i remember the SANAM Rule to which, if the Some, Any, None, All, More / Most from Manhatan prep guide
If the noun is a countable noun (nouns for which the plural form exists), then the verb is plural.
If the noun is an uncountable noun (nouns for which only the singular forms exists), then the verb is singular. ---> and in this case None of the investors - should be followed by ARE? hmm- would anyone be able to explain this?
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,765
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 16 Jun 2022, 04:44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rdrdrd1201
Hi i remember the SANAM Rule to which, if the Some, Any, None, All, More / Most from Manhatan prep guide
If the noun is a countable noun (nouns for which the plural form exists), then the verb is plural.
If the noun is an uncountable noun (nouns for which only the singular forms exists), then the verb is singular. ---> and in this case None of the investors - should be followed by ARE? hmm- would anyone be able to explain this?
Show more

Hello rdrdrd1201,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, this sentence does not actually use the word "none", rather it uses the pronoun phrase "Not one"; since the pronoun "one" is singular, the singular verb phrase "is expected" must be used.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
himanshu0123
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2016
Last visit: 20 Mar 2023
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
5
Given Kudos: 101
Posts: 190
Kudos: 5
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 05 Aug 2022, 08:24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
in choice A]

''that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were''

when if conditional is used in past tense, should not we say 'included' instead of includes?

isn't this a rule?
User avatar
RonTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 19 Jul 2022
Last visit: 07 Nov 2022
Posts: 430
Own Kudos:
537
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 430
Kudos: 537
 [1]
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 11 Aug 2022, 07:17
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
himanshu0123
in choice A]

''that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were''

when if conditional is used in past tense, should not we say 'included' instead of includes?

isn't this a rule?
Show more

First of all, nothing in this sentence is in the past, because the sentence describes hypothetical future possibilities: ("Not one investor is expected to make an offer until...")
The past tense, therefore, would just be wrong.



"If the deal were..." is called the subjunctive. It's used for hypothetical situations in the present or future. (For past hypothetical situations that didn't actually happen / come true, the subjunctive form is "If the deal had been...")

We know this isn't a past-tense verb, for two reasons:
1/ The context rules out any past timeframe (see above).
2/ "Deal" is singular, so the past-tense form is "the deal was".
User avatar
rickyric395
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2020
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 113
Own Kudos:
100
Given Kudos: 65
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 113
Kudos: 100
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 25 Jul 2023, 22:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATNinja , andrewng , KarishmaB , MartyTargetTestPrep and all other experts,
Why does this sentence in need of a subjunctive mood (option A)? It's not presenting any hypothetical or non-real scenario. It should have been a simple conditional statement.
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [2]
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy 25 Jul 2023, 22:31
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rickyric395
Hi GMATNinja , andrewng , KarishmaB , MartyTargetTestPrep and all other experts,
Why does this sentence in need of a subjunctive mood (option A)? It's not presenting any hypothetical or non-real scenario. It should have been a simple conditional statement.
Show more

It is discussing the hypothetical case of "the deal not concluding" in the future.

What would happen if the deal were not to be concluded? Then there would be penalties.

Look at the sentence:
Not one is expected to make an offer to buy until an agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.

So the agreement must have a provision for penalties. When would the penalties come into play? In case the deal is not concluded (a hypothetical case in the future).
   1   2   3   4 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts