Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 08:41 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 08:41
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [2]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nks2611
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 06 Apr 2020
Posts: 189
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 89
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE:Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
Posts: 189
Kudos: 74
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nks2611
hi,
expert , i am confused with sub-verb , to me it not one of the potential investors should be plural ?

if not check this example

he is one one of the persons who make money .

here why do we need work not works ?

please clarify
thanks

In your example the relative pronoun "who" refers to "persons" - the subject of the verb "make" is "who", i.e. "persons" ( not "one"). Your sentence implies that there are many persons who make (plural) money - he is one of them.

Now consider the following statement:
One of the persons makes money. Here the subject of the verb "makes" is "one", not "persons". This sentence implies that there are many persons, but only one makes money.

The subject sentence is of the latter form. Hence your comparison is not correct.
User avatar
vnigam21
Joined: 05 Jan 2016
Last visit: 19 Aug 2017
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 135
Status:Final Call! Will Achieve Target ANyHow This Tym! :)
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.8
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
Posts: 68
Kudos: 194
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have a doubt regarding option C, why is that choice wrong? Can you please explain.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,784
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vnigam21
I have a doubt regarding option C, why is that choice wrong? Can you please explain.
Here is the sentence using choice (C):

    "Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded."

The pronoun "them" is ambiguous... who will sign the merger agreement? The bank itself is singular, so the only possible referent in this sentence is the potential investors, but it probably doesn't make sense for all potential investors to sign any sort of agreement. Is the agreement to be signed by executives of First Interstate Bank? Shareholders? Board members? If those people aren't explicitly mentioned in the sentence, "them" can't refer to any of them.

Also, the use of the subjunctive "be signed" is not necessary in this case. For example, you would say, "I will not eat my soup until the fly is removed", not "I will not eat my soup until the fly be removed."

You could, however, use the subjunctive to express a hope/request/demand. For example, "I demand that the fly be removed from my soup."

I hope this helps!
User avatar
teaserbae
Joined: 24 Mar 2018
Last visit: 07 Mar 2022
Posts: 191
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 288
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
Posts: 191
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh Bishal123456789 AjiteshArun GMATNinjaTwo

How the sentence is correct since the then clause is missing if were, would why the would part is missing ?
User avatar
Jsound996
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 19 Jan 2018
Last visit: 11 Sep 2023
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,158
Products:
Posts: 104
Kudos: 128
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chunjuwu
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.


A. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were - A is the correct response

B. is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was SV agreement error at the end

C. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by themwith a provision for penalties if the deal were - "Them" has no antecedent

D. are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was - SV error

E. are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were
- SV error
User avatar
LoneSurvivor
Joined: 23 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2021
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 156
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Posts: 302
Kudos: 756
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I agree A is the only possible answer here but how come "that" refers to "agreement" as "agreement is signed" this part has verb and that is jumping to agreement and referring to agreement.

chunjuwu
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.


(A) is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were

(B) is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was

(C) is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were

(D) are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was

(E) are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were
User avatar
Gokul20
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 16 Oct 2019
Last visit: 30 May 2023
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 896
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36 (Online)
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
A simple approach to this problem will be:

Rule out D and E because of S-V number mismatch.

Rule out C because, it uses the imperative form of the verb - be signed - inappropriately without the other paraphernalia required for employing the present subjunctive mood. In addition what does the pronoun them stand for? Is it for the investors or the bankers or both?

Rule out B because, it uses the wrong idiom – offer for byiung - rather than - offer to buy.

You are happily left with A, which avoids the wrong idiom, the S-V number disagreement and the inapt present subjunctive.
Hi daagh,
Can you please explain when to use 'for verb+ing' and when to use 'to +verb', since both kinda are used to show intent or a reason for the action.
avatar
firsttimenoob
Joined: 25 Nov 2019
Last visit: 16 Mar 2021
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V36
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V36
Posts: 21
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chunjuwu
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.


(A) is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were

(B) is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was

(C) is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were

(D) are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was

(E) are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were

Can someone tell me where the marker for subjunctive mood is in the question? A little confused here. Thanks.
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [1]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chunjuwu
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.


(A) is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were

(B) is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was

(C) is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were

(D) are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was

(E) are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were

This question is based on Idiomatic Usage and Subject-Verb Agreement.

The options give us the choice between the singular verb ‘is’ and the plural verb ‘are’. Since the subject of the verb is “one”, the singular verb ‘is’ agrees with it.

Options D and E contain the verb ‘are’ that doesn’t agree with the subject “one”. So, Options D and E can be eliminated.

The options also give us a choice between the phrases “to make an offer to buy” and “to make an offer for buying”. The noun ‘offer’ should be followed by the infinitive ‘to buy’.

On the basis of this usage, Options B and D can be ruled out.

The options also give us a choice between the verb forms ‘was’ and ‘were’. The last part of the sentence conveys a hypothetical condition, so the appropriate verb form is the subjunctive form ‘were’. On the basis of this rule also, Options B and D can be ruled out.

Option C contains the inappropriate verb form “be signed”. So, Option C can also be eliminated.

Option A corrects the errors in all the other options. Therefore, A is the most appropriate option.

Jayanthi Kumar.
User avatar
junii
Joined: 15 Sep 2018
Last visit: 20 May 2022
Posts: 164
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 897
Location: Australia
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
Posts: 164
Kudos: 126
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@e-gmat GMATNinja CrackVerbalGMAT, Please experts can you please explain, because when i saw the egmat video lesson it mentions that one of the students, some of the teachers subjects are the students and teachers, hence they are plural, but in this case why it is singular?
User avatar
NikhilJose
Joined: 19 Nov 2020
Last visit: 30 Nov 2021
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 22
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I still cannot understand why "the deal were not included" is correct. (pluralism confusion)

I understand that in B the "they" doesn't have an antecedent/ refferant. but it seems to be the most correct out of the choice until. But between A and B how do we choose which is more correct??
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NikhilJose
I still cannot understand why "the deal were not included" is correct. (pluralism confusion)
Hi NikhilJose, the original sentence uses (what's called) a subjunctive usage that depicts hypothetical/wishful/unreal scenarios.

For example:

If I were a fairy, I would fly.

Quote:
I understand that in B the "they" doesn't have an antecedent/ refferant.
Yeah...no antecedent is pretty much always a no-go Nikhil. It really is a big deal and should pretty much always form the basis of a straight rejection.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses subjunctive usage, its application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
User avatar
jrk23
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Last visit: 29 Oct 2021
Posts: 300
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 300
Kudos: 80
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
vnigam21
I have a doubt regarding option C, why is that choice wrong? Can you please explain.
Here is the sentence using choice (C):

    "Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded."

The pronoun "them" is ambiguous... who will sign the merger agreement? The bank itself is singular, so the only possible referent in this sentence is the potential investors, but it probably doesn't make sense for all potential investors to sign any sort of agreement. Is the agreement to be signed by executives of First Interstate Bank? Shareholders? Board members? If those people aren't explicitly mentioned in the sentence, "them" can't refer to any of them.

Also, the use of the subjunctive "be signed" is not necessary in this case. For example, you would say, "I will not eat my soup until the fly is removed", not "I will not eat my soup until the fly be removed."

You could, however, use the subjunctive to express a hope/request/demand. For example, "I demand that the fly be removed from my soup."

I hope this helps!


hello Sir,

Could you please explain about the use of singular or plural verb.

"Not one of X" or "not one of Xs (plural)" or "none of the X" "none of the Xs"...

Please let me know what should follow after these mentioned above.

thanku Sir :)
avatar
ghost07gems
Joined: 04 Feb 2021
Last visit: 09 Jun 2022
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
SudiptoGmat
But how "a merger agreement is signed that includes" is grammatically correct?

until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the
deal were not to be concluded.


The above part of the text is actually a poetic expression meant to confuse the test takers. If you flip the clause, the classic version of the same will be:

Until a merger agreement that includes a provision for penalties if the
deal were not to be concluded, is signed


The relative clause introduced by the relative pronoun ‘that’ is an essential definer of the agreement. Per se, therefore, there is no grammar error in that expression

Hey Daagh, Thank You for your response.

Is there any way to know when the text is a poetic expression.
User avatar
ueh55406
Joined: 19 Dec 2020
Last visit: 31 Aug 2021
Posts: 149
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 316
Posts: 149
Kudos: 48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
QQ:

How come "the deal" is plural? shouldn't it be "provision for penalties if the deal was"

Thanks!
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ueh55406
QQ:

How come "the deal" is plural? shouldn't it be "provision for penalties if the deal was"
Good question. This sentence is using (what's called) subjunctive, which is typically used to depict hypothetical situations.

Some examples:

If Michael were to become the President, he would focus on removing poverty.

If Peter were a magician, he would wave a magic wand.


p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Subjunctive, its application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
avatar
Pragyajain1996
Joined: 17 Aug 2019
Last visit: 06 May 2021
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Status:Taking the GMAT
Affiliations: -
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Leadership
GPA: 3.64
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Posts: 4
Kudos: 6
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rule out D and E because of SVA ERROR.
C HAS PRONOUN ISSUE.
B has idioM issue.
A it is!
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts