ziko wrote:
I'm 32, 9 years WE in different areas, last 4 years managerial position. Did a lot of international business (because of the job nature). To be honest when you are long time away from school it is difficult to improve your score. I gave gmat 4 times and still could not manage to improve it much (well different excuses all the time, but the main one is that i work from 9 till 9, mostly on weekends as well so not much time and energy - i know this is not an excuse).
In your case i think GMAT is not an issue, because 660 is somewhere in the border of their minimum, if you have been selected for an interview it means they like your profile and need to check/confirm/reassure some details, i do not think that you will be rejected because of the GMAT. So do not think about it and concentrate on interview preparation! Trust me, 29 years old is not that old!
The best luck!
Yes, well I hope you're right about that. Lots of people tell me this - but when I see the score distributions its hard to find too many people with such a **** GMAT score getting admitted (although I'm hoping there is a self reporting bias towards people with high GMAT scores reporting them to this website).
I hear you about a) too much else going on to retake the exam and improve and b) it's tough teach an old dog new tricks.
Check/Confirm/Reassure details? What do you mean by that? Are we going to have background checks done on us? Do they really have time for that? I'm not sure they do. I'm not sure what the xfactor is at this point that gets you through to admission.
My rec was written by my chief investor and Chairman who is an Alum. He says they don't seem to pay much notice to his Alumni Interview recommendations. He told me they reject people who he thinks are perfect for the school all of the time. The only time he actually told them not to select someone they actually admitted the guy. This leads me to think that the interview is largely a formality where they just want to see if you have basic social skills or maybe get an idea if you had someone write your application for you (which is a pretty pervasive problem these days).
Which then brings us back to the question of, then how do they decide amongst the interviewed? Well, all I can come up with is that they will go back to your application and your GMAT and look at that. They will take that and see where you add value to other people in the program who they are looking to admit much in the same way a portfolio manager might see how one asset is correlated with another. This is all just my conjecture, however. If anyone has any real insight feel free to share it.