Last visit was: 17 Jun 2025, 09:36 It is currently 17 Jun 2025, 09:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
souvik101990
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 17 Jan 2025
Posts: 4,321
Own Kudos:
52,680
 [84]
Given Kudos: 2,326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
Posts: 4,321
Kudos: 52,680
 [84]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
75
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,337
 [22]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,337
 [22]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,521
Own Kudos:
5,681
 [8]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,521
Kudos: 5,681
 [8]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Nevernevergiveup
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Last visit: 20 Aug 2023
Posts: 1,009
Own Kudos:
2,939
 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,009
Kudos: 2,939
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There is a parallelism error 3-2 split of imitating vs imitated in comparison with written.
Thus B and D can be eliminated.
C gives a wrong meaning that inks imitated calligraphy style whereas inscriptions on tablets do that.
Out of A and E, A looks concise and good.
avatar
narmadadhruv
Joined: 30 May 2015
Last visit: 09 Jun 2017
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
46
 [3]
Given Kudos: 28
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Posts: 34
Kudos: 46
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Researchers report that the earliest surviving Mohican inscriptions on stone tablets, written with natural inks and imitated the Inca style of calligraphy, date from the eighth century B.

A. written with natural inks and imitated-> does not modify preceding clause

B. written with natural inks and imitating-> both correctly modify preceding clause

C. which were written with natural inks that imitated->which refers to stone tablets - does not make sense

D. which were written with natural inks and imitating->which refers to stone tablets - does not make sense

E. which was written with natural inks and which imitated->which refers to stone tablets - does not make sense

Awaiting OA.
Hope I am right!

Rgds,
Dhruva
avatar
rukna
Joined: 11 Feb 2015
Last visit: 10 Apr 2017
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
123
 [1]
Given Kudos: 70
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Posts: 66
Kudos: 123
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
Pure play of parallelism and logical reference for the pronoun ‘which’
Written and imitating are participial modifiers that befit the context. It is wrong to think that a past participle cannot be combined with a present participle. There are official examples to prove this point.

We can dispose of the pronoun issue of ‘which’ in one stroke that it is wrongly referring to the tablets rather than to the inscriptions. But then arguments surface that on the tablets is an essential prepositional modifier and therefore the inscriptions indeed are the logical reference. However, even after winking at this issue, we can still arrive at the right answer.

A. written with natural inks and imitated --- pseudo parallelism; meaning changes that the stone tablets imitated the Incas; it is the inscriptions that imitated. Here 'imitated' is a working past tense verb and not a past participle

B. written with natural inks and imitating --- Correct

C. which were written with natural inks that imitated ---What imitated the Inca?; definitely not the natural inks.

D. which were written with natural inks and imitating --- structurally unparallel; this sentence is trying to join a subordinate clause with a phrase by using the parallel comparator ‘and’

E. which was written with natural inks and which imitated --- which 'was written' is plain S-V number mismatch


P.S. eighth century B should be eighth century B.C., I suppose.

Thanks. I was confused b/w A and B.

I thought that past participle require past participle modifier.
Moreover, for -ed modifier it is tough to decide whether its working as modifier or as a verb.

I ask the question, is subject doing that work, then -ed is verb else modifier. ( as per e-gmat)

In this case, I asked " Is inscription doing the imitation". I was not sure about this. I thought NO. The inscription are not actually doing the work of imitation. So, its modifier and thus can be parallel.

Pls advice.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,337
 [6]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,337
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If you parse the clause and analyze the meaning, you will get to know the nuance. The text means that 1. Mohican inscriptions on stone tablets, (were) written with natural inks --- this is fine; written is a past participle.

2. If we add the same ‘were’ to the second part, it doesn’t work— (Mohican inscriptions on stone tablets) were imitated the Inca style – this is meaningless. Hence ‘imitated’ must be the action word of what the Mohican inscriptions did; therefore it is a past tense verb and not a past participial modifier like written. Please do not doubt whether an inscription can do any action. The action is meant figuratively.
avatar
ajwithlove
Joined: 04 Mar 2016
Last visit: 14 Jul 2017
Posts: 3
GMAT 1: 530 Q34 V29
GMAT 2: 580 Q42 V27
GMAT 3: 620 Q42 V34
GMAT 4: 640 Q45 V33
GMAT 4: 640 Q45 V33
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was confused between A and B.. but why do we choose imitating in place of imitated? i chose A because it was in past tense. can someone please explain why imitating is the correct answer?
avatar
TheRzS
Joined: 28 Jun 2015
Last visit: 09 Mar 2024
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 163
Location: Australia
Posts: 59
Kudos: 54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
Pure play of parallelism and logical reference for the pronoun ‘which’
Written and imitating are participial modifiers that befit the context. It is wrong to think that a past participle cannot be combined with a present participle. There are official examples to prove this point.

We can dispose of the pronoun issue of ‘which’ in one stroke that it is wrongly referring to the tablets rather than to the inscriptions. But then arguments surface that on the tablets is an essential prepositional modifier and therefore the inscriptions indeed are the logical reference. However, even after winking at this issue, we can still arrive at the right answer.

A. written with natural inks and imitated --- pseudo parallelism; meaning changes that the stone tablets imitated the Incas; it is the inscriptions that imitated. Here 'imitated' is a working past tense verb and not a past participle

B. written with natural inks and imitating --- Correct

C. which were written with natural inks that imitated ---What imitated the Inca?; definitely not the natural inks.


D. which were written with natural inks and imitating --- structurally unparallel; this sentence is trying to join a subordinate clause with a phrase by using the parallel comparator ‘and’

E. which was written with natural inks and which imitated --- which 'was written' is plain S-V number mismatch


P.S. eighth century B should be eighth century B.C., I suppose.


Thanks for your wonderful explanation daagh.
just to clarify, we ARE allowed to parallel two participial (past or present) in a participial phrase to modify subject, correct?

C. written with natural inks and imitating

in this case written || imitating is acceptable, evidently.

One more follow up question, does similar parallelism rule apply for absolute phrase/modifier?

Thanks
RzS
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 4,597
Own Kudos:
32,274
 [3]
Given Kudos: 683
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,597
Kudos: 32,274
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TheRzS

Thanks for your wonderful explanation daagh.
just to clarify, we ARE allowed to parallel two participial (past or present) in a participial phrase to modify subject, correct?

C. written with natural inks and imitating

in this case written || imitating is acceptable, evidently.

One more follow up question, does similar parallelism rule apply for absolute phrase/modifier?

Thanks
RzS



Hello TheRzS,


Thank you for the query. :-)


The entities that perform the same function in the sentence can make a parallel list. Structurally, they may not look identical, but because they perform the same function in the sentence, they become part of the same list.

Same is the case with this e-GMAT sentence in which written, a verb-ed modifier, is perfectly parallel to imitating, a verb-ing modifier, because both modifiers modify the same noun entity Mohican inscriptions on stone tablets.


At e-GMAT, we call such lists Imperfect Lists because the parallel elements in such lists structurally do not appear similar. In fact, we have an elaborate article on the same topic that contains many official examples of such questions that have "imperfect parallel list". This article named e-gmat Article - Parallelism: Imperfect List can be viewed in clicking on the following link:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/parallelism-imperfect-list-142791.html


I would also be glad to help you with the other follow up question. Can you please elaborate a bit more on the same, preferably with a reference sentence, so that I can provide you relevant information?

Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 991
Own Kudos:
1,892
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 991
Kudos: 1,892
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official explanation:
The past continuous tense “were imitating” conveys the meaning that the Greek inscriptions were continuously imitating something. Since the sentence presents general information about the Greek inscriptions in the past context, Simple Past Tense Verb should be used. -> D is wrong.

According to Kaplan, patterns in B and D often appear in the actual exam.
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 362
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 362
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I got the correct answer, but past participle modifier is doing the same job as incorrect choices with "which"?
avatar
jaisonsunny77
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Last visit: 25 Aug 2021
Posts: 459
Own Kudos:
377
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 459
Kudos: 377
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Researchers report that the earliest surviving Mohican inscriptions on stone tablets, written with natural inks and imitated the Inca style of calligraphy, date from the eighth century B.


A. written with natural inks and imitated
- at the time that the Mohican inscriptions were written, it was imitating the Inca style of calligraphy. Hence, we need to have the present progressive form of the verb 'indicate'.

B. written with natural inks and imitating - has no error. Hence, (B) is the right answer choice.

(C), (D), and (E) all have 'which' that tries to modify 'written'; this modification action does not make sense. Hence, eliminate (C), (D), and (E).

If you find this explanation helpful, please do give it a kudos. :thumbsup: :)
avatar
koolk
Joined: 06 Jun 2020
Last visit: 26 Apr 2025
Posts: 7
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 7
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jaisonsunny77
Researchers report that the earliest surviving Mohican inscriptions on stone tablets, written with natural inks and imitated the Inca style of calligraphy, date from the eighth century B.


A. written with natural inks and imitated
- at the time that the Mohican inscriptions were written, it was imitating the Inca style of calligraphy. Hence, we need to have the present progressive form of the verb 'indicate'.

B. written with natural inks and imitating - has no error. Hence, (B) is the right answer choice.

(C), (D), and (E) all have 'which' that tries to modify 'written'; this modification action does not make sense. Hence, eliminate (C), (D), and (E).

If you find this explanation helpful, please do give it a kudos. :thumbsup: :)

how does 'which ' modify 'written ' ?
is it incorrect to use 'which' after a ',' (comma) here?
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,399
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,399
Kudos: 946
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7329 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts