Last visit was: 28 Apr 2024, 01:27 It is currently 28 Apr 2024, 01:27

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 1232
Own Kudos [?]: 4562 [8]
Given Kudos: 128
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2017
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2017
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 32 [2]
Given Kudos: 36
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 May 2017
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [2]
Given Kudos: 108
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audie [#permalink]
2
Kudos
hi all

Can someone explain why not B instead of A?

The passage's central theme is the book written by author and the shenanigan claims of the author of not getting the due credit. The conclusion should be the related to the book not being good enough. That is the main cause. Option A is an effect of primary conclusion hence a secondary conclusion!

What do you say?
Current Student
Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Posts: 45
Own Kudos [?]: 29 [1]
Given Kudos: 128
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.58
Send PM
Re: Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audie [#permalink]
1
Kudos
bapism07 wrote:
hi all

Can someone explain why not B instead of A?

The passage's central theme is the book written by author and the shenanigan claims of the author of not getting the due credit. The conclusion should be the related to the book not being good enough. That is the main cause. Option A is an effect of primary conclusion hence a secondary conclusion!

What do you say?


Pay attention to the word "Significant" in option B. Extreme words are generally avoided in CR questions
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Posts: 319
Own Kudos [?]: 327 [0]
Given Kudos: 334
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE:Information Technology (Other)
Send PM
Re: Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audie [#permalink]
Akela wrote:
Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audience, he is not given due credit for his literary achievements. Surely he is mistaken. Gurney's books tell interesting stories, but the writing is flat, leaving no lasting impression on the reader. This is likely the reason that Gurney has not received praise for literary achievement.

Which one of the following most accurately states the argument's overall conclusion?

(A) Terrence Gurney is mistaken when he suggests that the wide appeal of his books has prevented him from being given due credit for his literary achievements.
(B) Terrence Gurney's books are not significant literary achievements.
(C) Even though Terrence Gurney's books tell interesting stories, his writing is flat and leaves no lasting impression on the reader.
(D) Terrence Gurney has not been given due credit for his literary achievements because his books appeal to such a wide audience.
(E) Terrence Gurney should have received some praise for his literary achievements despite the fact that his writing is flat and leaves no lasting impression on the reader.

LSAT


A. Nice. All passage in 1 sentence.
B. It is too extreme supposition.
C. It is all true. But only in part. It is not the whole passage.
D. It is simply false. The passage states an opposite thing.
E. No word about it in a passage or even any hint. We can say more. The passge states the opposite.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Status:EAT SLEEP GMAT REPEAT!
Posts: 114
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 143
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audie [#permalink]
A is the best answer here as it encapsulates the crux of whole Argument and is the overall conclusion.

Akela wrote:
Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audience, he is not given due credit for his literary achievements. Surely he is mistaken. Gurney's books tell interesting stories, but the writing is flat, leaving no lasting impression on the reader. This is likely the reason that Gurney has not received praise for literary achievement.

Which one of the following most accurately states the argument's overall conclusion?

(A) Terrence Gurney is mistaken when he suggests that the wide appeal of his books has prevented him from being given due credit for his literary achievements.
(B) Terrence Gurney's books are not significant literary achievements.
(C) Even though Terrence Gurney's books tell interesting stories, his writing is flat and leaves no lasting impression on the reader.
(D) Terrence Gurney has not been given due credit for his literary achievements because his books appeal to such a wide audience.
(E) Terrence Gurney should have received some praise for his literary achievements despite the fact that his writing is flat and leaves no lasting impression on the reader.

LSAT
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 450
Own Kudos [?]: 393 [0]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audie [#permalink]
bapism07 wrote:
hi all

Can someone explain why not B instead of A?

The passage's central theme is the book written by author and the shenanigan claims of the author of not getting the due credit. The conclusion should be the related to the book not being good enough. That is the main cause. Option A is an effect of primary conclusion hence a secondary conclusion!

What do you say?


Re read the passage. It states that he got some achievements: some might be significant while some may not, NO CREDIT was given to his achievements. I think this is where you are falling for.

Regards
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Feb 2020
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 31
Send PM
Re: Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audie [#permalink]
There are two close options A and B .B is deceptive but remember what is overall argument ? Here overall argument is that whatever gurnery thinks is mistaken in belief test everything written to prove why he is mistaken.

Posted from my mobile device
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 368
Own Kudos [?]: 708 [1]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
Send PM
Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audie [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audience, he is not given due credit for his literary achievements. Surely he is mistaken. Gurney's books tell interesting stories, but the writing is flat, leaving no lasting impression on the reader. This is likely the reason that Gurney has not received praise for literary achievement.

Which one of the following most accurately states the argument's overall conclusion?



Identify the conclusion question

Clearly the conclusion is the second sentence.
The first sentence is a claim that the author disputes in the second sentence and the third sentence is evidence used to strengthen the conclusion.

Option A

(A) Terrence Gurney is mistaken when he suggests that the wide appeal of his books has prevented him from being given due credit for his literary achievements.
(B) Terrence Gurney's books are not significant literary achievements.
(C) Even though Terrence Gurney's books tell interesting stories, his writing is flat and leaves no lasting impression on the reader.
(D) Terrence Gurney has not been given due credit for his literary achievements because his books appeal to such a wide audience.
(E) Terrence Gurney should have received some praise for his literary achievements despite the fact that his writing is flat and leaves no lasting impression on the reader.

LSAT
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Status:resting for now
Posts: 47
Own Kudos [?]: 103 [1]
Given Kudos: 126
Location: Germany
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Send PM
Re: Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audie [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Akela wrote:
Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audience, he is not given due credit for his literary achievements. Surely he is mistaken. Gurney's books tell interesting stories, but the writing is flat, leaving no lasting impression on the reader. This is likely the reason that Gurney has not received praise for literary achievement.

Which one of the following most accurately states the argument's overall conclusion?


Summary in own Words:
Terrence Gurney thinks of Reason A because of which he is not given credit for Literary achievement. The author says nono, there is a different reason for that.


(A) Terrence Gurney is mistaken when he suggests that the wide appeal of his books has prevented him from being given due credit for his literary achievements.
Expl: Sounds good. Terrence seems to be mistaken, considering the reason why he is not given credit. That is what the author basically says. Keep it for now.
Potential Candidate.

(B) Terrence Gurney's books are not significant literary achievements.
Expl: The author does not necessarily conclude that. The author could still think that Terrence's books are literary achievements and still draw his conclusion that there is a different reason why Terrence did not receive credit.
Incorrect.

(C) Even though Terrence Gurney's books tell interesting stories, his writing is flat and leaves no lasting impression on the reader.
Expl: That is a restatement of a claim of the author. But is that the conclusion? No, the main point of the author is that there is a different reason for not receiving credit. The author does not say that Terrence' writing is flat[...] in order to conclude that Terrence' writing is flat[...]!
Incorrect.

(D) Terrence Gurney has not been given due credit for his literary achievements because his books appeal to such a wide audience.
Expl: Thats a restatement of Terrence' statement. But the author thinks a bit different.
Incorrect.

(E) Terrence Gurney should have received some praise for his literary achievements despite the fact that his writing is flat and leaves no lasting impression on the reader.
Expl: The author never says that despite the flat writing Terrence should have received praise. The author just says that there is a different reason why Terrence did not receive credit for literary achievement.
Incorrect.

A) it is then.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17233
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audie [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Terrence Gurney suggests that because his books appeal to a wide audie [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne