GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Jan 2019, 17:24

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
  • The winning strategy for a high GRE score

     January 17, 2019

     January 17, 2019

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Learn the winning strategy for a high GRE score — what do people who reach a high score do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we've collected from over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     January 19, 2019

     January 19, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 08 May 2012
Posts: 12
Location: India
The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 24 Sep 2012, 20:07
3
1
14
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

24% (01:33) correct 76% (01:51) wrong based on 1147 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- where brothers slit each other's throats in a gory race to kinghood - can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

A. can and does not seem appalling; but still does.
B. can and does seem appalling; but still does not.
C. should and does seem appalling; and still does.
D. can and do not seem appalling; but still do.
E. may and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so.

Originally posted by sajini on 24 Sep 2012, 06:19.
Last edited by sajini on 24 Sep 2012, 20:07, edited 1 time in total.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Posts: 140
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2014, 21:51
9
3
catalysis wrote:
I have no idea what the sentence is saying...

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- where brothers slit each other's throats in a gory race to kinghood - can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

While reading the question stem, we see that a portion of the sentence is dashed. This is called an "em dash" or a "dash" and it replaces commas, semicolons, colons, and parentheses to indicate added emphasis, an interruption, or an abrupt change of thought. The info provided between the dashes gives additional information about sibling rivalry. For convenience, you can ignore the same. The construction is now as follows.

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

Further breaking it down (or rather expanding it - by placing the omitted verb + object)

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history can seem appalling, and does not seem appalling; but still does.

A. can and does not seem appalling; but still does.
can seem appalling and does not seem appalling - doesn't make sense.
B. can and does seem appalling; but still does not.
can seem appalling and does seem appalling; but still does not - doesn't make sense again
C. should and does seem appalling; and still does.
should seem appalling and does seem appalling; and still does - Good enough.
D. can and do not seem appalling; but still do.
can seem appalling and do not seem appalling - doesn't make sense again
E. may and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so.
may seem appalling and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so - wordy (after semicolon) and doesn't make any sense.
_________________

Read my posts...
What are modifiers ??

General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: faciendo quod indiget fieri
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 71
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2012, 06:40
In my opinion answer should be C, and as the sentence should use 'should' instead of'can'.. As can has that element of doubt whereas should has the tone of force and of. Sentence correctly joins two independent clauses by a semicolon

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 16
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2012, 11:08
I feel its A. What's the overall.
This is a good meaning type SC. What's the level of question.

Posted from my mobile device
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 934
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2012, 12:09
I ll go with Option D

Reason
Sentence requires a contrast X is thought to exist,can or cannot exist,but it exists..... Do should be used after but so as to repeat Slit each other's throat
Option has got and after condition which makes the intent incomplete.
May and does seem is redundancy
Can and does seem is redundancy
Use of does is incorrect

Its a good question
Pls post OA
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Prevent and prepare. Not repent and repair!!
Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Posts: 188
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.75
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2012, 23:46
This depends on the meaning of the sentence. How can we affirmatively say 'should'
_________________

I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan
Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously
Wont give up till i hit a 700+

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 16
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2012, 03:13
sajini wrote:
OA is C :roll:


Experts please tell the intended meaning of the sentence as I am really confused.
I feel B is the anwer now after searched the meaning of appalling!
Expert advice is required why C is correct.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 934
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2012, 06:39
One reason i feel C is the correct answer since it has "and" in between use of but after semi colon makes the clause as dependent clause.
Hence i feel all except C is wrong
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jul 2012
Posts: 127
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2013, 20:49
Can someone please give a detailed explanation...I could'nt understand the question
_________________

Preparing for another shot...

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 277
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2013, 20:58
The sentence after the semicolon has to be an independent clause so that the sentence can stand on its own.

I don't see that in any of the sentences. Can somebody explain this in detail??

What is the source of this question?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 106
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2013, 01:03
Weird question. Just could not comprehend it and the ans choices :?
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 42
Concentration: Marketing, Statistics
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2014, 20:52
I have no idea what the sentence is saying...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Posts: 53
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.27
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2015, 01:45
sajini wrote:
The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- where brothers slit each other's throats in a gory race to kinghood - can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

A. can and does not seem appalling; but still does.
B. can and does seem appalling; but still does not.
C. should and does seem appalling; and still does.
D. can and do not seem appalling; but still do.
E. may and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so.


C.
"should " means morally right or wrong. "It should appear gory infact it genuinely does appear gory."
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4615
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 14 Sep 2018, 00:06
2
Convoluted sentence with several negatives. But considering that ‘can’ means capacity, the combination can seem appalling looks dubious. Does the word ‘sibling rivalry' have the capacity to appear shocking? After all, sibling rivalry is no more than a word. So why it is a wrong name or why it should be shocking is anybody’s wonder.

So I think 'can' does not a have a locus standi in the circumstances. So I make bold to dump A, B, and D. Between C and E, I would prefer C because E uses ‘but and still’, a redundancy.
Incidentally, what does ‘past’ history mean? Is there a present history or future history?

Unfathomable question.
_________________

you can know a lot about something but not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509


Originally posted by daagh on 18 Oct 2015, 08:13.
Last edited by daagh on 14 Sep 2018, 00:06, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 432
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.33
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Feb 2017, 07:14
sajini wrote:
The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- where brothers slit each other's throats in a gory race to kinghood - can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

A. can and does not seem appalling; but still does.
B. can and does seem appalling; but still does not.
C. should and does seem appalling; and still does.
D. can and do not seem appalling; but still do.
E. may and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so.



Can some expert explain the solution ? I don't get it still :-(
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 432
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.33
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Feb 2017, 07:15
Please provide a step by step explanation to this question. Why is E wrong ?
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2911
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Feb 2017, 03:31
2
spetznaz wrote:
Please provide a step by step explanation to this question. Why is E wrong ?


Severely flawed question - the part after the semicolon must be a complete independent clause. Hence all options are wrong in the first place. The relative pronoun "where" must refer to a place, not "history". In GMAT "should" indicates a moral obligation. "Still" introduces a contrast, but in OA (C), there is none.

There are too many errors in this question - it seems to be from an unauthentic source.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 432
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.33
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Feb 2017, 06:22
sayantanc2k wrote:
spetznaz wrote:
Please provide a step by step explanation to this question. Why is E wrong ?


Severely flawed question - the part after the semicolon must be a complete independent clause. Hence all options are wrong in the first place. The relative pronoun "where" must refer to a place, not "history". In GMAT "should" indicates a moral obligation. "Still" introduces a contrast, but in OA (C), there is none.

There are too many errors in this question - it seems to be from an unauthentic source.


Thanks sayantanc2k :)
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Sep 2014
Posts: 109
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2018, 22:30
A. can and does not seem appalling; but still does.
B. can and does seem appalling; but still does not.
C. should and does seem appalling; and still does.
D. can and do not seem appalling; but still do.
E. may and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' &nbs [#permalink] 13 Sep 2018, 22:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.