GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 05 Apr 2020, 16:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- wh

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 08 May 2012
Posts: 11
Location: India
The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- wh  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 05 Mar 2019, 23:05
4
1
22
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

23% (01:33) correct 77% (01:49) wrong based on 1124 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- where brothers slit each other's throats in a gory race to kinghood - can and does not seem appalling; but still does.


A. can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

B. can and does seem appalling; but still does not.

C. should and does seem appalling; and still does.

D. can and do not seem appalling; but still do.

E. may and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so.

Originally posted by sajini on 24 Sep 2012, 06:19.
Last edited by Bunuel on 05 Mar 2019, 23:05, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Posts: 124
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- wh  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2014, 21:51
11
5
catalysis wrote:
I have no idea what the sentence is saying...

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- where brothers slit each other's throats in a gory race to kinghood - can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

While reading the question stem, we see that a portion of the sentence is dashed. This is called an "em dash" or a "dash" and it replaces commas, semicolons, colons, and parentheses to indicate added emphasis, an interruption, or an abrupt change of thought. The info provided between the dashes gives additional information about sibling rivalry. For convenience, you can ignore the same. The construction is now as follows.

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

Further breaking it down (or rather expanding it - by placing the omitted verb + object)

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history can seem appalling, and does not seem appalling; but still does.

A. can and does not seem appalling; but still does.
can seem appalling and does not seem appalling - doesn't make sense.
B. can and does seem appalling; but still does not.
can seem appalling and does seem appalling; but still does not - doesn't make sense again
C. should and does seem appalling; and still does.
should seem appalling and does seem appalling; and still does - Good enough.
D. can and do not seem appalling; but still do.
can seem appalling and do not seem appalling - doesn't make sense again
E. may and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so.
may seem appalling and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so - wordy (after semicolon) and doesn't make any sense.
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 42
Concentration: Marketing, Statistics
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- wh  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2014, 20:52
7
I have no idea what the sentence is saying...
Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1088
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: #Top150 SC: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Oct 2015, 07:55
The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history - where brothers slit each other's throats in a gory race to kinghood - can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

A. can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

B. can and does seem appalling; but still does not.

C. should and does seem appalling; and still does.

D. can and do not seem appalling; but still do.

E. may and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so.

misnomer suggests contrast in meaning.
Sth seems sth but it does not.............................is the structure of sentence.

so ignoring the additional info about past history in the form of modifier.
The sentence is

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history can and does not seem appalling; but still does.
misnomer reg sibling rivalry is singular subject and needs a singular verb does not plural verb do.
so D is out.
and in option C does not indicate needed contrast. hence C is out.
can and does seem are parallel wheras can and does not seem are not parallel.
so A is out.

Misnomer seems appalling; There is no action or event to say mis does not do so.

but still doesn't do so in E does not make sense.
So B.

Correct me if I'm wrong. :)
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5463
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- wh  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 14 Sep 2018, 00:06
2
1
Convoluted sentence with several negatives. But considering that ‘can’ means capacity, the combination can seem appalling looks dubious. Does the word ‘sibling rivalry' have the capacity to appear shocking? After all, sibling rivalry is no more than a word. So why it is a wrong name or why it should be shocking is anybody’s wonder.

So I think 'can' does not a have a locus standi in the circumstances. So I make bold to dump A, B, and D. Between C and E, I would prefer C because E uses ‘but and still’, a redundancy.
Incidentally, what does ‘past’ history mean? Is there a present history or future history?

Unfathomable question.
_________________
One-to-one video private sessions on SC +91 98845 44509, <newnaren@gmail.com>

Originally posted by daagh on 18 Oct 2015, 08:13.
Last edited by daagh on 14 Sep 2018, 00:06, edited 1 time in total.
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1688
Re: #Top150 SC: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Oct 2015, 00:06
1
This is not a good one! The subject of the sentence is "misnomer," so what seems appalling is the misnomer, not the action? That makes no sense. There is also no misnomer in this sentence. (Look up the word.) What else? "'Past' history" is redundant. "Where brothers . . . " follows "history" and so should be modifying that, not sibling rivalrly. Then, as Aditya pointed out, we should have commas in place of semicolons in every answer choice.

I could probably go on, but in short, do not try to learn English grammar or GMAT SC from this sentence!
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
Current Student
User avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 408
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.33
Reviews Badge
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- wh  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Feb 2017, 07:15
Please provide a step by step explanation to this question. Why is E wrong ?
_________________
" The few , the fearless "
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2825
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- wh  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Feb 2017, 03:31
4
spetznaz wrote:
Please provide a step by step explanation to this question. Why is E wrong ?


Severely flawed question - the part after the semicolon must be a complete independent clause. Hence all options are wrong in the first place. The relative pronoun "where" must refer to a place, not "history". In GMAT "should" indicates a moral obligation. "Still" introduces a contrast, but in OA (C), there is none.

There are too many errors in this question - it seems to be from an unauthentic source.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 8634
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- wh  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Mar 2020, 17:58
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- wh   [#permalink] 09 Mar 2020, 17:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- wh

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne