prashant6923 wrote:
With Saha's unfortunate injury, either Rishab Pant or Dinesh karthik would get a shot at changing the numbers!Can India resolve it's keeper-batsman woes in the upcoming test series
A. With Saha's unfortunate injury, either Rishab Pant or Dinesh karthik would get a shot at changing the numbers!Can India resolve it's keeper-batsman woes in the upcoming test series?
B. With Saha's unfortunately injury, either Rishab Pant or Dinesh karthik would get a shot at changing the numbers!Can India resolve their keeper-batsman woes in the upcoming test series?
C. With Saha's unfortunate injury, either Rishab Pant or Dinesh karthik would get a shot at changing the numbers!Can India resolve their keeper-batsman woes in the upcoming test series?
D. With Saha's unfortunately injury, either Rishab Pant or Dinesh karthik would get a shot at changing the numbers!Can India resolve it's keeper-batsman woes in the upcoming test series?
E. With Saha's unfortunate injury, either Rishab Pant or Dinesh karthik will get a shot to change the numbers!Can India resolve it's keeper-batsman woes in the upcoming test series?
Really, if to understand that "India" means not a coutry, but the sport team of India (as mentioned above), there is no any problem with findig the right answer.
It is C. B is out because of "unfortunately". And all other options use "it's"
About another nuanses.
1. "unfortunately injury" is wrong. "unfortunately" is not an adjective, and we need adjective "unfortunate" to modify noun "injury", so B and D are out.
2. I really do not like the word "will" in option E.
In A, C the word "would" is used and it makes a lot of sense.
These guys (Rishab Pant, Dinesh karthik) could, would get a shot and save the team (lets say so), they have a chances to do it. Maybe some other guys would have a shot too.
But when we say "will" in option E, it sounds very imperative, like no other players have chances. It has to make us suspicious about the correctness of E (many of us have chosen it).
3. And if we analyze 1 and 2 we will see that we are left with A and C. It gives us more chances to understand the issue with "India" maybe.
So, C.
-------
2 aglosh54:
So you are saying that India is replacing Indian team. Is Indian team plural or singular?
--------
"Indian team" is singular of course. But "Indians" is plural.
You can (and you have to) substite "India" with "Indians" here and it will be sematically right.