mikemcgarry wrote:
atilarora wrote:
seriously ?? is this a 700+ question ?? its very simple rationalization ..
Dear
atilaroraMy friend, you are obvious very skilled in mathematics.
you wrote later in the post something easy for someone might be difficult for others .. true .. rationalization easy for me does not mean I am very skilled ..
Quote:
IF you have the "difference of two squares" at your fingertips, and IF you remember how to square a radical (you'd be surprised how many folks are confused by even that!)
do you know anyone who is not aware of what is the square of 5 and sqrt(7) ??
Quote:
and IF you are familiar with the procedure for rationalizing an expression such as this, then yes, this question is very easy.
If its easy it should not be in 700+
Quote:
I am guessing that less than 10% of the GMAT taking population meets all of those "IF" conditions.
I was estimating the difficulty based on what most students studying for the GMAT know or don't know. Some people's brains short-circuit as soon as they see a fraction of any kind, and a fraction with radicals send some of them into conniptions. The entire idea of rationalizing a fraction with an expression involving addition of a radical in the denominator --- holy mackerel! For a large swathe of the test-taking population, such a problem might as well be written in Sanskrit! Obviously, you are quite familiar with this. Don't confuse "easy for you" with "easy" in general.
I don't know what GMAT taking population you know, as far as I know some of the students, everyone know how to do this particular question in less then 50 secs. May be because maths comes easy to Indians. and as you are an instructor you must get to know students of very different levels.
Quote:
This, in a way, is the paradox of all math --- when you don't know how to do it, it's impossibly difficult, and when you know how to do it, it is often trivially easy, and just one insight or shift in perspective can make the difference between those two.
Does this make sense?
Mike
truedat .. this makes sense Mike .. you can smile again.