Jul 19 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT The Competition Continues  Game of Timers is a teambased competition based on solving GMAT questions to win epic prizes! Starting July 1st, compete to win prep materials while studying for GMAT! Registration is Open! Ends July 26th Jul 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Jul 21 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 124
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Account Management (Consumer Products)

100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 16 Feb 2012, 21:52
Question Stats:
48% (02:22) correct 52% (02:26) wrong based on 1538 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors? A. 6 B. 16 C. 17 D. 33 E. 84
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
DETERMINED TO BREAK 700!!!
Originally posted by calreg11 on 16 Feb 2012, 21:34.
Last edited by Bunuel on 16 Feb 2012, 21:52, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56266

100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Feb 2012, 21:51
calreg11 wrote: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors? 6 16 17 33 84 {Total} = {Writers} + {Editors}  {Both} + {Neither}. {Total} = 100; {Writers} = 45; {Editors} > 38; {Both} = x; {Neither} = 2x; 100 = 45 + {Editors}  x + 2x x = 55  {Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus: x = {Both} = 55  39 = 16. Answer: B. Hope it's clear.
_________________




Current Student
Joined: 29 Mar 2012
Posts: 301
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V26 GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V28 GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V38

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2012, 20:08
Hi, In the below diagram, x = People who are both writers and editors, 2x = People who are neither writers or editors. & y = number of editors (>38) Attachment:
when.jpg [ 15.88 KiB  Viewed 42046 times ]
100 = 45 + y  x + 2x or y = 55  x > 38 or x < 17 Thus, x = 16. Answer (B) Regards,




Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 337
Location: Azerbaijan
Concentration: Finance

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Mar 2012, 13:25
question stem total=100 W=45 E= more than 38 WandE=x Neither=2x x? answer 100=45+39+2xx (to maximize x we need to minimize E. that is why E=39 the least value) x=16
_________________
Happy are those who dream dreams and are ready to pay the price to make them come true
I am still on all gmat forums. msg me if you want to ask me smth



Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2012
Posts: 49

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jul 2012, 00:13
Don't know if fundamentally different from other answers but here's how I got it:
E: editor /E: not editor W: writer /W: not writer
E(W) = X E(W)+E(/W)=Y>38 E(/W)=YX /E(/W)=2X hence /W=Y+X total: 100=Y+X+45 hence Y+X=55 least value of Y=39 for a maximized X
Hence X=16



Manager
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 145
Concentration: Marketing, Leadership
Schools: University of Dhaka  Class of 2010
GPA: 3.63
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Nov 2013, 06:03
Its easy if we assume minimum possible number of editors=39.
_________________
Practice Makes a Man Perfect. Practice. Practice. Practice......Perfectly
Critical Reasoning: http://gmatclub.com/forum/bestcriticalreasoningshortcutsnotestips91280.html
Collections of MGMAT CAT: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collectionsofmgmatcatmath152750.html
MGMAT SC SUMMARY: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mgmatscsummaryoffourthedition152753.html
Sentence Correction: http://gmatclub.com/forum/sentencecorrectionstrategiesandnotes91218.html
Arithmatic & Algebra: http://gmatclub.com/forum/arithmaticalgebra93678.html
Helpful Geometry formula sheet: http://gmatclub.com/forum/bestgeometry93676.html
I hope these will help to understand the basic concepts & strategies. Please Click ON KUDOS Button.



Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2013
Posts: 143

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jan 2014, 06:57
1002x = 45+Ex x=55E Max x will occur at min E. min E is 39. so max x = 5539 = 16. Ans B.
_________________
Click on Kudos if you liked the post!
Practice makes Perfect.



Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 225
Location: India

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jan 2014, 08:57
1002x=45+39x X=16 Ans.B
Posted from my mobile device



Intern
Joined: 28 Feb 2014
Posts: 5

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Apr 2014, 18:29
I also get x<17. But how do I know that x is 16 and not 6?



Intern
Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Posts: 32

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Apr 2014, 23:44
MelanieMa wrote: I also get x<17. But how do I know that x is 16 and not 6? Hi, The question asks for the highest possible value of x. So it is 16 not 6  Kudos, if you like



Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 118

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Apr 2014, 02:32
calreg11 wrote: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors?
A. 6 B. 16 C. 17 D. 33 E. 84 W + E  Both + Neither = 100 45 + E  (x) + 2x = 100 45 + E + x = 100 Now let us plug in answer options: We cannot plug in 84 as E will become negative If we plug in x = 33 then E = 22 (Wrong as there are more than 38 editors) If we plug in x = 17 then E = 38 (Wrong as there are more than 38 editors) Hence answer is x= 16
_________________
76000 Subscribers, 7 million minutes of learning delivered and 5.6 million video views
Perfect Scores http://perfectscores.org http://www.youtube.com/perfectscores



Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 239

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Aug 2014, 17:32
Bunuel wrote: calreg11 wrote: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors? 6 16 17 33 84 {Total}={Writers}+{Editors}{Both}+{Neither}. {Total}=100; {Writers}=45; {Editors}>38; {Both}=x; {Neither}=2x; 100=45+{Editors}x+2x > x=55{Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus x={Both}=5539=16. Answer: B. Hope it's clear. Hi Bunuel, Can you please explain "100=45+{Editors}x+2x > x=55{Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus x={Both}=5539=16." I understand the concept that when we want to maximize something, we want to minimize the other, but why do we want to minimize editors? Aren't we trying to find the greatest number of editors AND writers? Shouldn't we want to MAXIMIZE Editors AND Writers? Thanks



Manager
Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Posts: 54
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Aug 2014, 20:14
This would be my approach,
there are 45 writers.. let that be; now lets say there are 38 editors, 'x' of whom are also writers, who are already accounted for as writers in that 45. So the number of editors who are not writers is (38x).
Now the number of people who are neither writers or editors is 100  [( No.of writers) + (No.of Editors who are not writers)], and we know this is 2x
100  [ 45 + ( 38 x ) ] = 2x x= 17 but since number of editors is MORE than 38, 'x' has to be less than 17, so if we assume no.of editors is just 1 more at 39, then x=16.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56266

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Aug 2014, 09:50
russ9 wrote: Bunuel wrote: calreg11 wrote: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors? 6 16 17 33 84 {Total}={Writers}+{Editors}{Both}+{Neither}. {Total}=100; {Writers}=45; {Editors}>38; {Both}=x; {Neither}=2x; 100=45+{Editors}x+2x > x=55{Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus x={Both}=5539=16. Answer: B. Hope it's clear. Hi Bunuel, Can you please explain "100=45+{Editors}x+2x > x=55{Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus x={Both}=5539=16." I understand the concept that when we want to maximize something, we want to minimize the other, but why do we want to minimize editors? Aren't we trying to find the greatest number of editors AND writers? Shouldn't we want to MAXIMIZE Editors AND Writers? Thanks We want to maximize x, which is {both writers and editors}. To maximize x, we need to minimize {Editors} because x = 55  {Editors}. Does this make sense?
_________________



Manager
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
Posts: 142
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GPA: 3.94

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Oct 2014, 09:00
Completely missed the more than 38 part for the editors... Doi!



Current Student
Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Posts: 108

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jan 2017, 09:18
wow totally missed the more than clause in the question stem. Great question cause this is exactly what I need to focus on. Small mistakes such as this are killing me
_________________
Gmat prep 1 600 Veritas 1 650 Veritas 2 680 Gmat prep 2 690 (48Q 37V) Gmat prep 5 730 (47Q 42V) Gmat prep 6 720 (48Q 41V)



Manager
Joined: 23 Dec 2013
Posts: 142
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V41 GMAT 2: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.76

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 May 2017, 20:16
calreg11 wrote: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors?
A. 6 B. 16 C. 17 D. 33 E. 84 The trick of this problem is that you will read it too quickly. It states that more than 38 are editors, so you have to introduce an inequality into your table. Once you have > 38 as the total number of editors and x as the number of both writers and editors, then the number of editor nonwriters is 552x. 552x + x > 38 or x<17. The max integer value less than 17 is 16.



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 11667

Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Aug 2018, 13:15
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them
[#permalink]
13 Aug 2018, 13:15






