A recent government study links the high rates of respiratory ailments in Groverston to airborne pollutants released by the Woodco plywood manufacturing plant there. To address the problem, the government imposed strict regulations on emissions which will go into effect in four years. Although Woodco plans to cut its emissions in half two years ahead of schedule, it is unlikely that the rate of respiratory ailments will decline before the regulations go into effect, since _____________ . Which of the following most logically completes the passage? (A) the number of facilities capable of treating respiratory ailments is not likely to increase (B) reducing emissions even further than planned would necessitate decreasing production at Woodco (C) it is difficult to make accurate, long-term predictions about emissions (D) not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants (E) three new plywood manufacturing plants are about to go into production in Groverston

From the passage, we know that Woodco plans to reduce its respiratory-ailment-inducing pollution in two years, but for some reason the rate of respiratory ailments will not decline for four years. The correct answer will explain why the rate of respiratory ailments won't decline sooner. With that in mind, take another look at (D): (D) does not explain why the rate of ailments will not decrease as Woodco decreases pollution. The respiratory ailments caused by factors other than pollution will occur regardless of Woodco's efforts, and we have no information that implies that the rate these other ailments will change in the next several years. So, the overall number of ailments would look something like this: Before Woodco reduces pollution: Some number of ailments NOT caused by pollution + Some number of ailments caused by pollution After Woodco reduces pollution in two years: The SAME number of ailments NOT caused by pollution + A REDUCED number of ailments caused by pollution As you can see, even given the information in (D) we would expect the overall rate of respiratory ailments to decrease in two years. Because (D) does not explain why this reduction in respiratory ailments will not occur, we can eliminate (D). (E), on the other hand, provides a perfectly reasonable explanation as to why the rate of ailments will not go down as Woodco reduces pollution -- three more plywood plants are about to go into production. It is true that we do not know whether these plants produce the same pollutants, but the strong possibility that they do provides the "most logical" completion to the passage. I hope that helps!

Last visit was: 29 Apr 2026, 14:56

It is currently 29 Apr 2026, 14:56

Toolkit

Critical Reasoning (CR)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Back to Forum

Create Topic

A recent government study links the high rates of respiratory ailments

1 2

KyleWiddison

Manhattan Prep Instructor

Joined: 30 Apr 2012

Last visit: 06 Jul 2016

Posts: 779

Own Kudos:

2,697

Given Kudos: 5

Expert

Expert reply

Posts: 779

Kudos: 2,697

07 Nov 2014, 16:02

Kudos

Bookmarks

lfcfan

Kyle, thank you very much for your answers.
Just for me to understand, on the latter,
Answer E makes clearly the assumption that the drop of coffee consumption is caused by the increase of coffee price. In answer D, why is the assumption that the coffee consumption drop is caused by people switching to herbal tea and juice wrong ?
You say that "there isn't a direct connection to say that coffee drinkers have switched to juices and teas" and I agree. But there is none either that says that people are not paying for the price difference coming from the steady increase of coffee price.

There issue isn't with the assumption, it's with the answer choice. The answer choice says that there has been an increase in consumption of juice and caffeine-free herbal teas. If we are trying to attack the conclusion (the decrease in coffee usage stems from the anti-caffeine publicity) we need information to explain a decrease in coffee that is not related to caffeine. This answer choice actually supports instead of attacks the conclusion - they stopped drinking coffee and started drinking non-caffeine drinks to get away from unhealthy caffeine.

If the answer choice said that people preferred the taste of juices and non-caffeine teas (unrelated to the health benefits) and switched from drinking coffee, then we would have an answer choice that would attack the conclusion.

KW

bhatiavai

Joined: 07 Dec 2009

Last visit: 28 Aug 2018

Posts: 66

Own Kudos:

112

Given Kudos: 375

Schools: HEC '18 LBS '17 Kelley '18 Schulich '17 Mendoza '18

GMAT Date: 12-03-2014

Schools: HEC '18 LBS '17 Kelley '18 Schulich '17 Mendoza '18

Posts: 66

Kudos: 112

31 Dec 2014, 05:51

Kudos

Bookmarks

I was stuck between D and E.
Didn't go for E as the option was bringing in new Information ie 3 new plants

I thought we could bring in new info only for weaken/strengthen questions. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Many thanks

KyleWiddison

Manhattan Prep Instructor

Joined: 30 Apr 2012

Last visit: 06 Jul 2016

Posts: 779

Own Kudos:

2,697

[1]

Given Kudos: 5

Expert

Expert reply

Posts: 779

Kudos: 2,697

[1]

31 Dec 2014, 15:51

Kudos

Bookmarks

This question is essentially acting as a weaken question because it asks you to complete the part that describes why the result is "unlikely". We need to introduce new information to show why it is unlikely.

KW

Posted from my mobile device

abhigulia3006

Joined: 30 Jan 2018

Last visit: 22 Apr 2019

Posts: 12

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 153

Location: India

Schools: Duke '21 Kellogg '21 Booth '21 CBS '21 Ross '21 ISB '20 Goizueta '21 Rotman '21

GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V29 Verified score

GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41 Verified score

GPA: 3.17

Schools: Duke '21 Kellogg '21 Booth '21 CBS '21 Ross '21 ISB '20 Goizueta '21 Rotman '21

GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41 Verified score

Posts: 12

Kudos: 12

23 Feb 2018, 23:21

Kudos

Bookmarks

betterscore

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

A recent government study links the high rates of respiratory ailments in Groverston to airborne pollutants released by the Woodco plywood manufacturing plant there. To address the problem, the government imposed strict regulations on emissions which will go into effect in four years. Although Woodco plans to cut its emissions in half two years ahead of schedule, it is unlikely that the
rate of respiratory ailments will decline before the regulations go into effect, since _____________ .

(A) the number of facilities capable of treating respiratory ailments is not likely to increase

(B) reducing emissions even further than planned would necessitate decreasing production at Woodco

(C) it is difficult to make accurate, long-term predictions about emissions

(D) not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants

(E) three new plywood manufacturing plants are about to go into production in Groverston

I have a question regarding the wording used in the questions above. For option E to be the valid answer, shouldn't the phase "before the regulations go into effect" not be included in the question as if E is the OA then even after the regulations are put into effect there will not be a decrease in the rates of respiratory ailments.

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

Joined: 13 Aug 2009

Last visit: 29 Apr 2026

Posts: 7,391

Own Kudos:

70,830

[1]

Given Kudos: 2,133

Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors

Location: United States (CO)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 Verified score

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Posts: 7,391

Kudos: 70,830

[1]

01 Mar 2018, 16:28

Kudos

Bookmarks

abhigulia3006

betterscore

Why can't the rates of respiratory ailments go down after the regulations are put into effect? Sure, there will be more plants, but if they are all subject to "strict regulations on emissions", then the combined emissions of the three plants could be less than current emissions of Woodco.

Regardless, we need to explain why "it is unlikely that the rate of respiratory ailments will decline before the regulations go into effect." We don't care about what happens after the regulations are put into effect. Woodco is cutting its emissions in half, but there will soon be three new plants. BEFORE the regulations go into effect, those new plants can emit as much pollution as they want. So, even though Woodco is going to reduce its emissions, it is unlikely that the total amount of airborne pollution will decrease until the regulations go into effect.

I hope that helps!

teaserbae

Joined: 24 Mar 2018

Last visit: 07 Mar 2022

Posts: 188

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 288

Location: India

Schools: Carlson Foster '24 Haas '24 Kelley '24 Kellogg '24

GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31 Verified score

Schools: Carlson Foster '24 Haas '24 Kelley '24 Kellogg '24

GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31 Verified score

Posts: 188

Kudos: 49

21 Jul 2018, 22:24

Kudos

Bookmarks

KyleWiddison

To answer this question, you need to find an answer choice that correctly describes why ailments will not decrease in spite of emmission reductions. It's okay to bring in new information, but that information needs to stay true to the stated premises in the argument.

A-We're concerned about the number of ailments, not the treatment "post-ailment".
B-How Woodco acheives its reduction in emmissions is irrelevant because that reduction is already a given premise.
C-Irrelevant information. This does not explain why ailments would increase despite decreased emmissions.
D-Interesting point, but irrelevant because the first premise states that the ailments are connected to airborne emmissions. Granted there could be other ailments, but the ones we care about result from airborne pollutants.
E-This is right on! If new plants go into production in Groverston, the emmissions from the 3 new plants will overwhelm the emmissions acheived in the Woodco plant.

KW

As per my understanding new info is not allowed in such question. Can you please clearify ?

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

Joined: 13 Aug 2009

Last visit: 29 Apr 2026

Posts: 7,391

Own Kudos:

70,830

Given Kudos: 2,133

Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors

Location: United States (CO)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 Verified score

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Posts: 7,391

Kudos: 70,830

26 Jul 2018, 15:02

Kudos

Bookmarks

teaserbae

KyleWiddison

As per my understanding new info is not allowed in such question. Can you please clearify ?

As a test-taker, it's generally a terrible idea for you to bring in your own outside knowledge when you're answering GMAT CR questions. But depending on how the question is constructed, the correct answer might be something that did not actually appear in the passage.

For example, think about an assumption question. The correct answer will always be an assumption that the author made in the passage -- so by definition, the correct answer is NOT something that was stated in the passage.

The same is true of this passage, and I think that's what Kyle was saying in his explanation. Check out that last line of the passage again:

"...it is unlikely that the rate of respiratory ailments will decline before the regulations go into effect, since _____________ ."
The correct answer will strengthen the idea that "it is unlikely that respiratory ailments will decline before regulations go into effect." And of course, that "strengthener" will be an additional piece of information that was not already mentioned in the passage.

I hope that helps!

ash124

Joined: 21 Jan 2018

Last visit: 06 Apr 2025

Posts: 107

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 64

Status:Improving everyday

Location: India

Schools: ISB '23 Judge '23 Said '23 Sloan '24 Fuqua '24 LBS '24 CEIBS '24 INSEAD Jan 22 intake Yale '24

GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31 Verified score

GPA: 3.23

WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Products:

Schools: ISB '23 Judge '23 Said '23 Sloan '24 Fuqua '24 LBS '24 CEIBS '24 INSEAD Jan 22 intake Yale '24

GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31 Verified score

Posts: 107

Kudos: 88

08 Oct 2019, 10:48

Kudos

Bookmarks

KyleWiddison

I have one question

It is regarding option E:It is not necessary that three new plants will emit the same harmful pollution
if we consider this point then option D is better.
Please help

thanks in advance

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

Joined: 13 Aug 2009

Last visit: 29 Apr 2026

Posts: 7,391

Own Kudos:

70,830

[3]

Given Kudos: 2,133

Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors

Location: United States (CO)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 Verified score

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Posts: 7,391

Kudos: 70,830

[3]

02 Nov 2019, 09:01

Kudos

Bookmarks

ash124

KyleWiddison

I have one question

It is regarding option E:It is not necessary that three new plants will emit the same harmful pollution
if we consider this point then option D is better.
Please help

thanks in advance

From the passage, we know that Woodco plans to reduce its respiratory-ailment-inducing pollution in two years, but for some reason the rate of respiratory ailments will not decline for four years. The correct answer will explain why the rate of respiratory ailments won't decline sooner. With that in mind, take another look at (D):

Quote:

(D) not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants

(D) does not explain why the rate of ailments will not decrease as Woodco decreases pollution. The respiratory ailments caused by factors other than pollution will occur regardless of Woodco's efforts, and we have no information that implies that the rate these other ailments will change in the next several years. So, the overall number of ailments would look something like this:

Before Woodco reduces pollution:

Some number of ailments NOT caused by pollution +
Some number of ailments caused by pollution

After Woodco reduces pollution in two years:

The SAME number of ailments NOT caused by pollution +
A REDUCED number of ailments caused by pollution

As you can see, even given the information in (D) we would expect the overall rate of respiratory ailments to decrease in two years. Because (D) does not explain why this reduction in respiratory ailments will not occur, we can eliminate (D).

(E), on the other hand, provides a perfectly reasonable explanation as to why the rate of ailments will not go down as Woodco reduces pollution -- three more plywood plants are about to go into production. It is true that we do not know whether these plants produce the same pollutants, but the strong possibility that they do provides the "most logical" completion to the passage.

I hope that helps!

Sneha2021

Joined: 20 Dec 2020

Last visit: 10 Jun 2025

Posts: 294

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 522

Location: India

Posts: 294

Kudos: 39

10 Sep 2022, 10:49

Kudos

Bookmarks

KarishmaB GMATNinja

it is unlikely that the rate of respiratory ailments will decline before the regulations go into effect, since _________

(D) not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants

If D is true, there are other reasons exist for respiratory ailments, so other factor would lead to increase in ailments. This could be the reason that rate of ailments unlikely to decrease.
Why D is incorrect?

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

Joined: 13 Aug 2009

Last visit: 29 Apr 2026

Posts: 7,391

Own Kudos:

70,830

Given Kudos: 2,133

Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors

Location: United States (CO)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 Verified score

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Posts: 7,391

Kudos: 70,830

14 Sep 2022, 11:40

Kudos

Bookmarks

Sneha2021

The conclusion states that it is unlikely that the rate of respiratory ailments will decline. It doesn't say that the ailments are unlikely to be eliminated.

The question then asks us to complete the passage. In other words, why is it unlikely that the rate of respiratory ailments will decline? With that in mind, here's (D):

Quote:

(D) not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants

It's important to pay close attention to the precise wording of the answer choice here. (D) states that "not ALL respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants." In other words, SOME (maybe 1%, maybe 99%) respiratory ailments are caused by things other than airborne pollutants.

The problem is that we still have reason to believe that OTHER (maybe 1%, maybe 99%) respiratory ailments ARE caused by airborne pollutants. So, Woodco's plans to cut emissions will chip away at the cause of some cases of respiratory ailments (not ALL, but some). But even chipping away at SOME of the cases of respiratory ailments will still decrease the overall rate. So, we don't have reason to believe that a decrease in the rate is unlikely, and we can eliminate (D).

I hope that helps!

TrungTiger

Joined: 27 Jun 2020

Last visit: 27 Apr 2026

Posts: 17

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 38

Posts: 17

Kudos: 3

05 Feb 2023, 20:58

Kudos

Bookmarks

Dear Sir GMATNinja
is option E equivalent to “there are other factors which are increasing polution” ?

GMATNinja

Sneha2021

Quote:

(D) not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants

Posted from my mobile device

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

Joined: 13 Aug 2009

Last visit: 29 Apr 2026

Posts: 7,391

Own Kudos:

70,830

[2]

Given Kudos: 2,133

Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors

Location: United States (CO)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 Verified score

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Posts: 7,391

Kudos: 70,830

[2]

08 Feb 2023, 15:06

Kudos

Bookmarks

TrungTiger

Dear Sir GMATNinja

is option E equivalent to “there are other factors which are increasing polution” ?

Yes, (E) tells us that pollution is likely to increase in the near future.

Specifically, three new plywood manufacturing plants are about to go into production in Groverston. Because we know that the existing plywood manufacturing plant causes air pollution, it is likely that these additional plants will also cause air pollution. Additionally, we know that the particular type of air pollution released by the current plant is linked to respiratory illness, so it's likely that the pollution from the additional plants will also be linked to respiratory illness.

Finally, because these plants are "about" to go into production, they have the next four years to produce as much pollution as they want before the new regulations come into effect.

All of this gives us reason to believe that the rate of respiratory illness is unlikely to decline before the regulations are enforced. (E) is the correct answer.

I hope that helps!

TrungTiger

Joined: 27 Jun 2020

Last visit: 27 Apr 2026

Posts: 17

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 38

Posts: 17

Kudos: 3

[1]

19 Feb 2023, 19:10

Kudos

Bookmarks

Thank you very much for your detail explanation.
I comprehended it.

GMATNinja

TrungTiger

Dear Sir GMATNinja

is option E equivalent to “there are other factors which are increasing polution” ?

ArnauG

Joined: 23 Dec 2022

Last visit: 14 Oct 2023

Posts: 284

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 199

Posts: 284

Kudos: 43

21 May 2023, 03:04

Kudos

Bookmarks

The passage discusses a government study linking the high rates of respiratory ailments in Groverston to airborne pollutants released by the Woodco plywood manufacturing plant. The government has imposed strict regulations on emissions that will go into effect in four years. Although Woodco plans to cut its emissions in half two years ahead of schedule, the passage states that it is unlikely that the rate of respiratory ailments will decline before the regulations go into effect. The question asks us to select the option that most logically completes the passage based on the information provided.

To find the most suitable completion for the passage, we need to consider the reasoning provided and identify the option that provides a logical explanation for why the rate of respiratory ailments is unlikely to decline before the regulations go into effect.

Option (A) states that the number of facilities capable of treating respiratory ailments is not likely to increase. While this information may be relevant to the overall healthcare system, it does not directly address why the rate of respiratory ailments is unlikely to decline before the regulations go into effect. Therefore, option (A) is not the most appropriate completion for the passage.

Option (B) suggests that reducing emissions even further than planned would require decreasing production at Woodco. While this may be a valid point, it does not directly explain why the rate of respiratory ailments is unlikely to decline before the regulations go into effect. Therefore, option (B) is not the most suitable completion for the passage.

Option (C) states that it is difficult to make accurate, long-term predictions about emissions. While this may be true, it does not directly address why the rate of respiratory ailments is unlikely to decline before the regulations go into effect. Hence, option (C) is not the most logical completion for the passage.

Option (D) mentions that not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants. This option provides an alternative explanation for the high rates of respiratory ailments, suggesting that there may be other factors contributing to the problem besides Woodco's emissions. Option (D) logically completes the passage by presenting an alternative explanation for the lack of expected decline in respiratory ailments.

Option (E) states that three new plywood manufacturing plants are about to go into production in Groverston. This information suggests that the overall emissions in the area may increase due to the additional plants, which could counteract the emissions reduction efforts by Woodco. Option (E) provides a logical explanation for why the rate of respiratory ailments is unlikely to decline before the regulations go into effect, as the presence of new plants could offset the emissions reductions by Woodco.

In conclusion, both option (D) and option (E) provide plausible completions for the passage. However, option (E) directly addresses the issue of emissions from other plants potentially hindering the decline in respiratory ailments, aligning more closely with the information provided. Therefore, option (E) is the most suitable completion for the passage.

VerbalBot

Non-Human User

Joined: 01 Oct 2013

Last visit: 04 Jan 2021

Posts: 19,426

Own Kudos:

1,010

Posts: 19,426

Kudos: 1,010

10 Jun 2025, 01:35

Kudos

Bookmarks

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.

1 2

Moderators:

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

7391 posts

AbhishekP220108

509 posts

bhanu29

363 posts