Last visit was: 21 May 2024, 03:31 It is currently 21 May 2024, 03:31
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2012
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 93 [28]
Given Kudos: 46
Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2012
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 93 [6]
Given Kudos: 46
General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2012
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 93 [4]
Given Kudos: 46
Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2014
Posts: 112
Own Kudos [?]: 328 [1]
Given Kudos: 12
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Maksym wrote:
An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y had called in sick in order to take care of a sick child. The company's CEO instituted free on-site day care in hopes of reducing the number of employees engaging in this practice. However, the number of employees who called in sick to care for a sick child was actually higher in the sixth month of the on-site day-care program than it had been the month before the program was instituted.

Each of the following, if true, might account for the free day-care plan's apparent lack of success EXCEPT:

(A) Many parents at Company Y employ nannies, who care for both sick and healthy children.

(B) Many parents declined to use the day care for fear that their sick children would catch a second illness from another sick child.

(C) The on-site free day-care center is noisy, hot, and uncomfortable.

(D) The sixth month of the on-site day-care program happened to fall at the height of flu season.

(E) During the six-month period in question, the number of employees at Company Y increased by 25%.

The reason that I find answer A to be correct is that it is non-unique. Those parents employed nannies before and after the new program was instituted.
Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2014
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [0]
Given Kudos: 93
Schools: ISB '17
GMAT 1: 530 Q35 V28
GPA: 2.5
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
IMO A
They employed nanies but still call in sick...
Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 105
Concentration: Technology, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
Maksym wrote:
An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y had called in sick in order to take care of a sick child. The company's CEO instituted free on-site day care in hopes of reducing the number of employees engaging in this practice. However, the number of employees who called in sick to care for a sick child was actually higher in the sixth month of the on-site day-care program than it had been the month before the program was instituted.

Each of the following, if true, might account for the free day-care plan's apparent lack of success EXCEPT:

(A) Many parents at Company Y employ nannies, who care for both sick and healthy children.

(B) Many parents declined to use the day care for fear that their sick children would catch a second illness from another sick child.

(C) The on-site free day-care center is noisy, hot, and uncomfortable.

(D) The sixth month of the on-site day-care program happened to fall at the height of flu season.

(E) During the six-month period in question, the number of employees at Company Y increased by 25%.

Can someone please explain why E is wrong?
As the no. Of employees increased so the no. Of ppl taking leave increased.
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 429
Own Kudos [?]: 264 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Schools: Cambridge'16
An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
archersharma wrote:
Maksym wrote:
An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y had called in sick in order to take care of a sick child. The company's CEO instituted free on-site day care in hopes of reducing the number of employees engaging in this practice. However, the number of employees who called in sick to care for a sick child was actually higher in the sixth month of the on-site day-care program than it had been the month before the program was instituted.

Each of the following, if true, might account for the free day-care plan's apparent lack of success EXCEPT:

(A) Many parents at Company Y employ nannies, who care for both sick and healthy children.

(B) Many parents declined to use the day care for fear that their sick children would catch a second illness from another sick child.

(C) The on-site free day-care center is noisy, hot, and uncomfortable.

(D) The sixth month of the on-site day-care program happened to fall at the height of flu season.

(E) During the six-month period in question, the number of employees at Company Y increased by 25%.

Can someone please explain why E is wrong?
As the no. Of employees increased so the no. Of ppl taking leave increased.

100 people work--------- 40 call for child
125 people work ---------50 calls. So E resolves the paradox. We need answer that is indifferent or sharpening the paradox, it is A
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 304
Own Kudos [?]: 300 [0]
Given Kudos: 353
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
WE:Sales (Telecommunications)
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
A it is because it doesn't explain why people take a day off to seat with sick children if they babysitter can do it. Hence other reason should be
Intern
Joined: 11 Aug 2014
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
GPA: 3
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
Can anyone explain why A is correct and why not E
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 304
Own Kudos [?]: 300 [0]
Given Kudos: 353
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
WE:Sales (Telecommunications)
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
shasara wrote:
Can anyone explain why A is correct and why not E

Hi shasara!
A is correct because this is Except question. Hence we should find an answer that doesn't explain why free-day plan wasn't successful. A says that "many parents gave nannies". Hence parents could leave children with nannies and do not take day off. But they did take. Hence there should be other reason. And about E. E is incorrect since the argument states that "number of employees who called in sick to care for a sick child was actually higher in the sixth month of the on-site day-care program than it had been the month before the program was instituted.". Hence if total number of employees increased by 25% this increase explains why number of employees was higher in the sixth month but not the month before the program was instituted. Hope it is clear
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Status:The best is yet to come.....
Posts: 397
Own Kudos [?]: 833 [0]
Given Kudos: 235
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
How does E prove that the plan was lack of success?
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 449
Own Kudos [?]: 396 [0]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
Mahmud6 wrote:
How does E prove that the plan was lack of success?

E is stating that there is an 25% increase in total number of employees.
Now, Because there is 25% increase - hence we can say that the number of sick leaves has increased a bit from previous data.(prior to 6month period).
Hence, supporting the premise.
thereby, it MIGHT account for the free day-care plan's apparent lack of success .
Retired Moderator
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 101
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
Current Student
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 128 [0]
Given Kudos: 31
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
Straightforward A

It doesn't help resolve the paradox.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Posts: 2099
Own Kudos [?]: 8861 [0]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y had called in sick in order to take care of a sick child. The company's CEO instituted free on-site day care in hopes of reducing the number of employees engaging in this practice. However, the number of employees who called in sick to care for a sick child was actually higher in the sixth month of the on-site day-care program than it had been the month before the program was instituted.

Type - Explain Except - free day-care plan's apparent lack of success

(A) Many parents at Company Y employ nannies, who care for both sick and healthy children. -Correct
(B) Many parents declined to use the day care for fear that their sick children would catch a second illness from another sick child. Incorrect- It does explain a reason why parents would be reluctant to use the day-care
(C) The on-site free day-care center is noisy, hot, and uncomfortable. Incorrect- The center isn't good
(D) The sixth month of the on-site day-care program happened to fall at the height of flu season. - Incorrect
(E) During the six-month period in question, the number of employees at Company Y increased by 25%. - If there are 25% more people in the company, then you'll likely have more people in the day care AND more people calling in sick.

Intern
Joined: 23 Jan 2017
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 33 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
I feel E is the right answer rather than A. This is an "Except" question. So 4 of the answers might account for the free-day-care plan's lack of success, and 1 might not.

Option (B) - Parents declined use of day care. Clearly, it accounts for the free day care plan's failure.
Option (C) - Day care is noisy, hot, and uncomfortable. So maybe parents declined use of day care. It accounts for the free day care plan's failure.
Option (A) - Many parents employ nannies. So those parents did not use day care. So, this also clearly accounts for the plan's failure.
Option (D) - Flu season might result in more sickness, maybe severe sickness. Parents may want to keep sick children at home rather than at a daycare. So again, it accounts for the plan's failure.
Option (E) - Increase in employees neither necessarily indicate increase in participation, nor lack of participation in the plan. No information is given to make any call here.

Also note that the question is NOT to account for the increase in no. of employees calling in sick, so inferring that "increase in employee count might have increased the no. of people calling sick" is irrelevant. Instead, the question is to account for the lack of success of the day care's plan. The day care's plan was to reduce the no. of employees calling in sick (2nd sentence of the argument). Option (A), (B) and (C) indicates lack of participation in the plan, resulting in non-reduction of employees calling in sick. Option (D) indicates possibility of increasing it. Option (E) is the only option that doesn't carry sufficient information to draw any inference.

I feel some people opting for (A) are looking only from the angle of "reduction of number of people calling in sick" only. But the conclusion is around implementation of free day care plan causing the reduction. People who were using nanny services before the program may have continued using their service. So the daycare program did not change their existing routine, and this indicates lack of success of the day care plan. So (A) cannot be the correct answer.

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 260
Own Kudos [?]: 172 [0]
Given Kudos: 342
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
chaudhurysr wrote:
I feel E is the right answer rather than A. This is an "Except" question. So 4 of the answers might account for the free-day-care plan's lack of success, and 1 might not.

Option (B) - Parents declined use of day care. Clearly, it accounts for the free day care plan's failure.
Option (C) - Day care is noisy, hot, and uncomfortable. So maybe parents declined use of day care. It accounts for the free day care plan's failure.
Option (A) - Many parents employ nannies. So those parents did not use day care. So, this also clearly accounts for the plan's failure.
Option (D) - Flu season might result in more sickness, maybe severe sickness. Parents may want to keep sick children at home rather than at a daycare. So again, it accounts for the plan's failure.
Option (E) - Increase in employees neither necessarily indicate increase in participation, nor lack of participation in the plan. No information is given to make any call here.

Also note that the question is NOT to account for the increase in no. of employees calling in sick, so inferring that "increase in employee count might have increased the no. of people calling sick" is irrelevant. Instead, the question is to account for the lack of success of the day care's plan. The day care's plan was to reduce the no. of employees calling in sick (2nd sentence of the argument). Option (A), (B) and (C) indicates lack of participation in the plan, resulting in non-reduction of employees calling in sick. Option (D) indicates possibility of increasing it. Option (E) is the only option that doesn't carry sufficient information to draw any inference.

I feel some people opting for (A) are looking only from the angle of "reduction of number of people calling in sick" only. But the conclusion is around implementation of free day care plan causing the reduction. People who were using nanny services before the program may have continued using their service. So the daycare program did not change their existing routine, and this indicates lack of success of the day care plan. So (A) cannot be the correct answer.

Free day care failed and we have to find yes, it was failed.

(A) Many parents at Company Y employ nannies, who care for both sick and healthy children.
Does this strengthen the case that P was failed. No, it just say that Some parents employ nannies. Care for both sick and healthy children. This employ subset doesn't contribute in no. of employees who call in sick to take care of their children.

now there could be two situations:

1> they don't use day-care. :- No effect on no. of employees calling in sick.
2> they use day-care. :- No effect on no. of employees calling in sick. why because they were not the part of "number of people calling in sick"

SO A it is.

(E) During the six-month period in question, the number of employees at Company Y increased by 25%.
If no. of employees are more, it may be the case that more no. of parents, and more call-in-sick. so may be these parents are not choosing Day-care and that explains failure of day-care program.

BUT I BELIEVE ASSUMPTION HERE IS out of 25% -there are some parents and they are not opting for day care services.
but still it explains

chaudhurysr
implementation of free day care plan causing the reduction :- This was not in the question. The ques stem don't question implementation.
Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2017
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 87 [0]
Given Kudos: 47
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V23
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
chaudhurysr
Why E is Wrong-
If number of employee is increased than obviously there are more chances of occurrence of they taking sick leaves.
Reasoning- A tank is filled with water, and it has 2 outlets. To make it empty you just need any of the 2 or both to be open.
However to keep it filled, you need both to be closed.
Current Student
Joined: 13 Feb 2016
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 34 [0]
Given Kudos: 324
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V47 (Online)
GPA: 3.9
WE:Corporate Finance (Energy and Utilities)
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
Only option A neither weakens nor strengthens.
Rest all explains the failure.
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2015
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
Re: An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y [#permalink]
A) Many parents at Company Y employ nannies, who care for both sick and healthy children. It has no bearing on employees taking more leaves for sick children

(B) Many parents declined to use the day care for fear that their sick children would catch a second illness from another sick child. One child already sick..this could affect the number

(C) The on-site free day-care center is noisy, hot, and uncomfortable.
Definitely affects
(D) The sixth month of the on-site day-care program happened to fall at the height of flu season.
Affects

(E) During the six-month period in question, the number of employees at Company Y increased by 25%.
Number of employees inc could increase number of children as well