Bunuel wrote:
For manufacturing of the vaccine Fluvax, the first step is to grow a particular virus InfluX under strictly controlled temperature conditions, in the range of -65 degree celsius to -67 degree celsius, within a bioreactor. Tests on the virus show that it can actually grow well in a broader range of temperature, even up to a temperature as high as -50 degree celsius. Since
growing the virus successfully is the most important step of manufacturing the vaccine, as some financial controllers think, by relaxing the temperature conditions
the manufacturing costs can be significantly reduced without risking the loss of the batch. However, the idea of the financial controllers may not be effective because a catalyst used in the process cannot withstand such levels of temperature fluctuations.
In the argument above, the two boldfaced parts play which of the following roles?
A. The first is an objection against the opinion of the author; the second is the opinion of the author.
B. The first is the opinion of the author; the second is the opinion that the author calls into question.
C. The first is a perception that has been offered in support of the opinion that the author calls into question; the second is a condition on which that perception is based.
D. The first is a claim that the author calls into question; the second is the opinion of the author.
E. The first is a perception that has been offered in support of the opinion that the argument calls into question; the second is that opinion.
Thank you
sayantanc2k for the question!!!
The conclusion of author is that the suggestion of financial controllers is not viable. Boldface 1 is given as a fact and boldface 2 is given as the opinion of financial controllers to which the author disagrees.
Now let us look at each option.
A. The first is an objection against the opinion of the author; the second is the opinion of the author.
First statement is not any objection. Also, second is not the opinion of author. Option A is out.
B. The first is the opinion of the author; the second is the opinion that the author calls into question.
First is not the opinion of author. Option B is out.
C. The first is a perception that has been offered in support of the opinion that the author calls into question; the second is a condition on which that perception is based.
Statement 1 is right. But statement 2 is not any condition. It is the opinion of financial controllers which the author calls into question.
Option C is out.
D. The first is a claim that the author calls into question; the second is the opinion of the author.
First is not a claim. It's given as a fact. Option D is out.
E. The first is a perception that has been offered in support of the opinion that the argument calls into question; the second is that opinion.
Option E matches with our initial analysis and is the correct answer.