If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x

Some function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [-1.5]=-1, ...

Hence, since [x/2] = 0, then it must be true that \(-1<\frac{x}{2}\leq{0}\): any number from this range when rounded up gives 0.

\(-1<\frac{x}{2}\leq{0}\) --> \(-2<x\leq{0}\), Only option B is in this range.

Answer: B.

Similar questions to practice:
if-denotes-the-least-integer-greater-than-or-equal-to-x-132223.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-94687.html
for-all-numbers-t-let-t-be-defined-as-the-greatest-105416.html
is-x-an-odd-integer-1-x-2-2x-99856.html
for-all-z-denotes-the-least-integer-greater-than-or-110561.html
denotes-to-be-the-least-integer-no-less-than-x-is-130841.html
for-all-numbers-t-let-t-be-defined-as-the-greatest-105416.html
if-is-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-what-144277.html
how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html
awkward-ds-105416.html
help-data-sufficiency-equation-and-inequalities-99856.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-94687.html
denotes-to-be-the-least-integer-no-less-than-x-is-130841.html
is-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-the-real-n-154006.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-z-162078.html
if-denotes-the-least-integer-greater-than-or-equal-to-x-132223.html
is-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-the-real-n-154006.html
for-all-z-denotes-the-least-integer-greater-than-or-equ-167640.html

Hope it helps.
_________________

First, let's take a moment to get a good idea of what this strange notation means.
A few examples:
[5.1] = 6
[3] = 3
[8.9] = 9
[-1.4] = -1
[-13.6] = -13


So, if [x/2] = 0, then we know that -1 < x/2 ≤ 0
Multiply all sides of the inequality by 2 to get: -2 < x ≤ 0

Check the answer choices....
Only -3/2 falls inside that range.

Answer: B

Cheers,
Brent

Bunuel


Thank you for the response. When I was taking the GMAT Prep test yesterday and this question appeared, I just could not figure out what it was asking.

Thank you for the explanation.

Hi All,

This is an example of a 'Symbolism' question - the prompt 'makes up' a math symbol, tells you what it means, then asks you to perform a calculation using it. When dealing with these types of symbols, it often helps to jot down a few examples, so that you understand the work that will be required of you when you deal with the actual question that is asked.

Here, we're told that [X] is the LEAST INTEGER greater than or equal to X. Thus...

[2] = 2
[.5] = 1
[-1.5] = -1
Etc.

When we're told that [X/2] = 0, this implies that whatever is inside the symbol is a limited range that is LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 0....

For example:
[0] = 0
[-.5] = 0
[-.9999] = 0
Etc.

With this information, finding the value of X shouldn't be too hard...which answer will fit this pattern when you plug it into [X/2]?

Final Answer:

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

Attached is a visual that should help.

A) \([ \frac{-2}{-1} ] = [ -1 ] = -1\)

B) \([ \frac{-3}{4} ] = 0\)

Since [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
This means x = I , if x is an integer and x = I
x = i+1, if x is not an integer and x = i + d where i is integral part of x and d i decimal part of x

So [x/2] = 0
-1 < x/2 < = 0
-2 < x <= 0

Only -3/2 lies in between this range..

Answer B..

We are given that [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x and [x/2] = 0.

Let’s analyze each answer choice:

A) -2

[-2/2] = [-1]

This is not correct since the least integer greater than or equal to -1 is -1, which is not 0.

B) -3/2

[(-3/2)/2] = [-3/4]

This is correct since the least integer greater than or equal to -3/2 is 0.

Answer: B
_________________

I just have question

If [x] denotes a least number greater or equal to x, then doesn't [x] need to be bigger than x?
For example: [3.1] = 3; [4.3] = 4

Hi Yesul,

This is an example of a 'Symbolism' question - the prompt 'makes up' a math symbol, tells you what it means, then asks you to perform a calculation using it. When dealing with these types of symbols, it often helps to jot down a few examples, so that you understand the work that will be required of you when you deal with the actual question that is asked.

Here, we're told that [X] is the LEAST INTEGER greater than or equal to X. Thus...

[2].... so what is the least integer that is greater than or equal to 2?.... [2] = 2
[0.5]... so what is the least integer that is greater than or equal to 0.5?.... [0.5] = 1
[-1.5]... so what is the least integer that is greater than or equal to -1.5?.... [-1.5] = -1
Etc.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

\([1] = 1\)
\([1.2] = 2\)
\([-1.3] = -1\)

Lets go through the choices:

A. [-2/2] = [-1] = -1

B. [-3/2/2] = [-3/4] = 0. CORRECT

C. [1/2/2] = [1/4] = 1

D. [1/2] = 1

E. [2/2] = 1

Answer is B.
_________________

What you are thinking of is the greatest integer less than or equal to x.
What we have here is the least integer greater than or equal to x.

So [x] will be equal to x or greater than it.

Say x = 3.1. Then [x] = 4
Say x = 4.3. Then [x] = 5

You are given that [something] = 0
This means something is either 0 or between -1 and 0.
So x/2 is either 0 or between -1 and 0.
When x = -3/2, x/2 is -3/4 which is between -1 and 0.

Answer (B)
_________________

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________