Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:57 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
505-555 Level|   Arithmetic|   Functions and Custom Characters|                                    
User avatar
Walkabout
Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Last visit: 30 Oct 2025
Posts: 172
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
Products:
Posts: 172
Kudos: 28,189
 [321]
22
Kudos
Add Kudos
296
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,258
 [69]
17
Kudos
Add Kudos
52
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
JeffTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 2,977
Own Kudos:
8,389
 [20]
Given Kudos: 1,646
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 2,977
Kudos: 8,389
 [20]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,293
Own Kudos:
1,930
 [5]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,293
Kudos: 1,930
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Video solution from Quant Reasoning:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
General Discussion
avatar
karanamin
Joined: 26 May 2012
Last visit: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
32
 [12]
Given Kudos: 7
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT Date: 09-17-2012
Products:
Posts: 13
Kudos: 32
 [12]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You are asked what the closest lesser integer value to [x] is.

[-1.6] = -2.0
[3.4] = 3.0
[2.7] = 2.0

Therefore , answer is: -2.0 + 3.0 + 2.0 = 3.0

Option A.
User avatar
infinitemac
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Last visit: 21 Jul 2019
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 20
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Question - I first approached this question by straight away adding -1.6 + 3.4 + 2.7 but how come we have to find out what each individual value is worth before combining them? Thanks!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,258
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,258
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
infinitemac
Question - I first approached this question by straight away adding -1.6 + 3.4 + 2.7 but how come we have to find out what each individual value is worth before combining them? Thanks!

Let me ask you - what is the question:

What is the value of [-1.6] + [3.4] + [2.7] = ?

OR

What is the value of [-1.6 + 3.4 + 2.7] = ?
User avatar
hopefulmba2021
Joined: 31 Aug 2020
Last visit: 24 Feb 2022
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x, shouldn't x be a higher value than [x]?
So, IMO
[-1.6] = -1

[3.4] = 4

[2.7] = 3

I am getting confused by the wording in this problem.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,258
 [4]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,258
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
soumyadeeppaul1
If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x, shouldn't x be a higher value than [x]?
So, IMO
[-1.6] = -1

[3.4] = 4

[2.7] = 3

I am getting confused by the wording in this problem.

If [x] is the greatest integer LESS than or equal to x. So, [x] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer:

[-1.6] = -2, because -2 is the greatest integer LESS than or equal to -1.6.

[3.4] = 3, because 3 is the greatest integer LESS than or equal to 3.4.

[2.7] = 2, because 2 is the greatest integer LESS than or equal to 2.7.

If it were, [x] denotes the least integer GREATER than or equal to x, then we should rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2 (because 2 is the least integer GREATER than or equal to 1.5), [2]=2, [-1.5]=-1, ...

Check similar questions to practice here: Rounding Functions.

Hope it helps.
User avatar
Hovkial
Joined: 23 Apr 2019
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 803
Own Kudos:
2,409
 [1]
Given Kudos: 202
Status:PhD trained. Education research, management.
Posts: 803
Kudos: 2,409
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OFFICIAL GMAT EXPLANATION

The greatest integer that is less than or equal to –1.6 is –2. It cannot be –1 because –1 is greater than –1.6. The greatest integer that is less than or equal to 3.4 is 3. It cannot be 4 because 4 is greater than 3.4. The greatest integer that is less than or equal to 2.7 is 2. It cannot be 3 because 3 is greater than 2.7. Therefore, [-1.6]+[3.4]+[2.7]= -2+3+2 = 3

The correct answer is A.
avatar
sahuanamika
Joined: 22 May 2021
Last visit: 05 Oct 2021
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 107
Posts: 45
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It is asked to get the closest lesser integer value of [x] :

[-1.6] = -2.0 as -2 is less than -1.6
[3.4] = 3.0
[2.7] = 2.0

Therefore , answer is: -2.0 + 3.0 + 2.0 = 3.0

Option A.
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 516
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
soumyadeeppaul1
If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x, shouldn't x be a higher value than [x]?
So, IMO
[-1.6] = -1

[3.4] = 4

[2.7] = 3

I am getting confused by the wording in this problem.

If [x] is the greatest integer LESS than or equal to x. So, [x] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer:

[-1.6] = -2, because -2 is the greatest integer LESS than or equal to -1.6.

[3.4] = 3, because 3 is the greatest integer LESS than or equal to 3.4.

[2.7] = 2, because 2 is the greatest integer LESS than or equal to 2.7.

If it were, [x] denotes the least integer GREATER than or equal to x, then we should rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2 (because 2 is the least integer GREATER than or equal to 1.5), [2]=2, [-1.5]=-1, ...

Check similar questions to practice here: Rounding Functions.

Hope it helps.

Bunuel
To confirm, for -1.6, you round down because .6 is greater than .5? If it was -1.4, you would round to -1, correct? Happy Holidays!
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,886
 [1]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,886
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
woohoo921
Bunuel
soumyadeeppaul1
If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x, shouldn't x be a higher value than [x]?
So, IMO
[-1.6] = -1

[3.4] = 4

[2.7] = 3

I am getting confused by the wording in this problem.

If [x] is the greatest integer LESS than or equal to x. So, [x] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer:

[-1.6] = -2, because -2 is the greatest integer LESS than or equal to -1.6.

[3.4] = 3, because 3 is the greatest integer LESS than or equal to 3.4.

[2.7] = 2, because 2 is the greatest integer LESS than or equal to 2.7.

If it were, [x] denotes the least integer GREATER than or equal to x, then we should rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2 (because 2 is the least integer GREATER than or equal to 1.5), [2]=2, [-1.5]=-1, ...

Check similar questions to practice here: Rounding Functions.

Hope it helps.

Bunuel
To confirm, for -1.6, you round down because .6 is greater than .5? If it was -1.4, you would round to -1, correct? Happy Holidays!

Hey woohoo921


You are confusing what Bunuel said with the concepts of rounding up/rounding down as we use in estimation. In estimation, rounding off really does depend on which integer your decimal number is closer to. In that sense, yes, -1.6 would round off to -2, while -1.4 would round off to -1.

But this question is completely different. Here, you have a definition of [x] and that is all you need to use. Let’s try to understand this in more detail:

  • For every x, function [x] in this question is defined as a round down function only.
    • Here, “rounding down x” means going to the nearest integer that is smaller than or equal to x. Irrespective of the value of a number, we will round it to the greatest integer less than or equal to the number.


Let’s see two examples now – both your considerations, -1.4 and -1.6.

  • x = -1.4: Realize that we want the greatest integer which is less than -1.4.
    • So, out of all the integers less than -1.4, we just need the greatest.
    • This list of integers is {-2, -3, -4, -5, …} and the greatest integer in the list is -2.
    • Hence, [-1.4] = -2.
    • x = -1.6: Again, we want the greatest integer which is less than -1.6.
    • So, out of all the integers less than -1.6, we need the greatest.
    • The list is the same even now, {-2, -3, -4, -5, …}, and the greatest integer in it is -2.
    • Hence, [-1.6] = -2 also!


Hope this helps!


Best Regards,
Ashish
Quant Expert, e-GMAT
User avatar
Rahilgaur
Joined: 24 Jun 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q81 V82 DI72
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q81 V82 DI72
Posts: 104
Kudos: 74
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Walkabout
If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x, what is the value of [-1.6] + [3.4] + [2.7]?

(A) 3
(B) 4
(C) 5
(D) 6
(E) 7
Output of [x] is
1. an integer
2. less than x.
Hence, [-1.6] => -2 , [3.4]=> 3, [2.7]= 2,

Answers ===> -2+3+2= 3­
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,588
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,588
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
Tuck School Moderator
805 posts