Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 10:05 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 10:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 (Medium)|   Functions and Custom Characters|                           
avatar
macwanjason
Joined: 01 May 2012
Last visit: 04 Sep 2012
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
358
 [351]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 358
 [351]
37
Kudos
Add Kudos
312
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,729
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,798
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,729
Kudos: 810,419
 [135]
42
Kudos
Add Kudos
93
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mbaiseasy
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Last visit: 29 Dec 2013
Posts: 316
Own Kudos:
2,094
 [38]
Given Kudos: 11
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
Posts: 316
Kudos: 2,094
 [38]
21
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
vivekdhawan
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Last visit: 18 Dec 2014
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
42
 [12]
Given Kudos: 9
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 11
Kudos: 42
 [12]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1) -1<x<1
if x=-0.5; {x}=0;
if x=0.5; {x}= 1
not sufficient
2)if x<0
itself not suficient, i.e cant be 0 or -1 or any negative int.

however 1) & 2) together are sufficient with -1<x<0 , {x}=0


therefore c
avatar
ED1290
Joined: 24 May 2013
Last visit: 29 Jun 2013
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
4
 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
GMAT Date: 06-27-2013
Posts: 5
Kudos: 4
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I got the right answer but the question is tricky for me: "if [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x"... does it concern only numbers like [1.5]=2; [-1.5]=-1;... or [1.4] will also be rounded to 2?

Thank's
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,729
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,798
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,729
Kudos: 810,419
 [13]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abid1986
Joined: 01 Jan 2013
Last visit: 09 Sep 2016
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Location: India
Posts: 38
Kudos: 158
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?

Some function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [-1.5]=-1, ...

Question: is \([x]=0\)? --> is \(-1<x\leq{0}\)?

(1) -1< x< 1. Not sufficient.
(2) x < 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) -1<x<0. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Similar questions to practice:
how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html
awkward-ds-105416.html
help-data-sufficiency-equation-and-inequalities-99856.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-94687.html
denotes-to-be-the-least-integer-no-less-than-x-is-130841.html

Hope it helps.


Hi Bunuel,
Can you post some 650+ - 700 level PS/DS questions on greatest integer function.

Thanks!!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,729
Own Kudos:
810,419
 [9]
Given Kudos: 105,798
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,729
Kudos: 810,419
 [9]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abid1986
Bunuel
If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?

Some function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [-1.5]=-1, ...

Question: is \([x]=0\)? --> is \(-1<x\leq{0}\)?

(1) -1< x< 1. Not sufficient.
(2) x < 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) -1<x<0. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Similar questions to practice:
how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html
awkward-ds-105416.html
help-data-sufficiency-equation-and-inequalities-99856.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-94687.html
denotes-to-be-the-least-integer-no-less-than-x-is-130841.html

Hope it helps.


Hi Bunuel,
Can you post some 650+ - 700 level PS/DS questions on greatest integer function.

Thanks!!

Similar questions:
if-denotes-the-least-integer-greater-than-or-equal-to-x-132223.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-94687.html
for-all-numbers-t-let-t-be-defined-as-the-greatest-105416.html
is-x-an-odd-integer-1-x-2-2x-99856.html
for-all-z-denotes-the-least-integer-greater-than-or-110561.html
denotes-to-be-the-least-integer-no-less-than-x-is-130841.html
for-all-numbers-t-let-t-be-defined-as-the-greatest-105416.html
if-is-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-what-144277.html
how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html
awkward-ds-105416.html
help-data-sufficiency-equation-and-inequalities-99856.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-94687.html
denotes-to-be-the-least-integer-no-less-than-x-is-130841.html
is-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-the-real-n-154006.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-z-162078.html

Hope it helps.
avatar
sabxu1
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Last visit: 31 May 2016
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 11
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?

Some function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [-1.5]=-1, ...

Question: is \([x]=0\)? --> is \(-1<x\leq{0}\)?

(1) -1< x< 1. Not sufficient.
(2) x < 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) -1<x<0. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Similar questions to practice:
how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html
awkward-ds-105416.html
help-data-sufficiency-equation-and-inequalities-99856.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-94687.html
denotes-to-be-the-least-integer-no-less-than-x-is-130841.html

Hope it helps.


"[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x" i can see why this is rounding down

but "If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x"i dont see how thisis rounding down and why

"[x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x" why is this rounding up... i mean if theres only 2 of these i guess i could memorise but i'm trying to understand why...

please help. Ive been stuck on this interpretation for ages i dont want to just memorise it.
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
3,889
 [16]
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,889
 [16]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sabxu1
Bunuel
If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?

Some function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [-1.5]=-1, ...

Question: is \([x]=0\)? --> is \(-1<x\leq{0}\)?

(1) -1< x< 1. Not sufficient.
(2) x < 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) -1<x<0. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Similar questions to practice:
how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html
awkward-ds-105416.html
help-data-sufficiency-equation-and-inequalities-99856.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-94687.html
denotes-to-be-the-least-integer-no-less-than-x-is-130841.html

Hope it helps.


"[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x" i can see why this is rounding down

but "If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x"i dont see how thisis rounding down and why

"[x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x" why is this rounding up... i mean if theres only 2 of these i guess i could memorise but i'm trying to understand why...

please help. Ive been stuck on this interpretation for ages i dont want to just memorise it.

A quick comment. DO NOT memorize these definitions as they are not fixed. GMAT can change the definition of what the [x] does. Just try to understand what is the given definition.


Try to break it down in manageable chunks.

Case 1: "If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x" ---> let x=4.4 what is the greatest integer LESS THAN or EQUAL to x ? Answer is 4 (5 will be GREATER THAN and NOT less than).You will get the equality when x = integer.

Thus, based on the definition of [x] above, [4.4] = 4 (you rounded DOWN ---> you went to a lower number).

Case 2: "[x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x" ---> let x =4.4 ---> based on this current definition, what is the LEAST integer GREATER or EQUAL to x? Answer is 5 (4 will not be correct here as 4<4.4). You will get the equality when x = integer.

Thus, based on the definition of [x] above, [4.4] = 5 (you rounded UP ---> you went to a higher number).

Do not memorize functional definitions as these definitions can change. Example, I can give you a question telling you that [x] denotes a function such that [x] =\(x^2\) etc.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 963
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,561
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 963
Kudos: 1,936
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How to deal with such kind of gmat question in a general way?
User avatar
Lucy Phuong
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Last visit: 12 Aug 2021
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
351
 [2]
Given Kudos: 106
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V25
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.48
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 111
Kudos: 351
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chesstitans
How to deal with such kind of gmat question in a general way?

Hi,

I think the point here is to understand the phrase "the least integer greater than or equal to x". It means that if we have a number x, then just round it up to the possible smallest integer and we will get [x]. Remember that x could be anything, not just an integer. For example, if x=-1.2, then [x]=-1. Or if x=5, then [x]=5.

This is a DS question. Then we read the information given in each statement and put it into number line to figure out whether we could answer the question.

For example, (1) -1<x<1
Put -1 and 1 into the number line. We'll see that there are many situations to test. If -1<x=<0, then [x]=0. But that will not be necessarily the case, if 0<x<1. Because if 0<x<1, then [x]=1.
Inconsistent answers mean insufficient statement.
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
36,438
 [5]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,438
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
macwanjason
If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?

(1) -1< x< 1
(2) x < 0

Target question: Is [x] = 0?
This is a good candidate for rephrasing the target question.

Given: [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x

Let's make sure we understand what this [] symbol means.
Here are a few examples:
[3.1] = 4
[5.8] = 6
[0.7] = 1
[-0.9] = 0
[0] = 0
[-4.6] = -4
[-1] = -1

We can see that [x] = 0, when -1 < x ≤ 0
So, we can REPHRASE the target question . . .

REPHRASED target question: Is -1 < x ≤ 0 ?

Aside: My video below has tips on rephrasing the target question

Statement 1: -1< x< 1
Let's TEST some values.
There are several values of x that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: x = -0.5. In this case, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, it IS the case that -1 < x ≤ 0
Case b: x = 0.5. In this case, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is NO, it is NOT the case that -1 < x ≤ 0
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x < 0
Let's TEST some values.
There are several values of x that satisfy statement 2. Here are two:
Case a: x = -0.5. In this case, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, it IS the case that -1 < x ≤ 0
Case b: x = -3. In this case, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is NO, it is NOT the case that -1 < x ≤ 0
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
When we combine the two statements, we get the inequality -1 < x < 0
So, for ALL possible values of x, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, it IS the case that < x ≤
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C

Cheers,
Brent

RELATED VIDEO
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?

Some function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [-1.5]=-1, ...

Question: is \([x]=0\)? --> is \(-1<x\leq{0}\)?

(1) -1< x< 1. Not sufficient.
(2) x < 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) -1<x<0. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Similar questions to practice:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/how-x-become- ... 94687.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/awkward-ds-105416.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/help-data-suf ... 99856.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-denotes-th ... 94687.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/denotes-to-be ... 30841.html

Hope it helps.
Hello Bunuel
Thanks for the explanation. May I know WHY we don't consider x< 1 when we combined both statement?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,729
Own Kudos:
810,419
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,798
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,729
Kudos: 810,419
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Asad
Bunuel
If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?

Some function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [-1.5]=-1, ...

Question: is \([x]=0\)? --> is \(-1<x\leq{0}\)?

(1) -1< x< 1. Not sufficient.
(2) x < 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) -1<x<0. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Similar questions to practice:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/how-x-become- ... 94687.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/awkward-ds-105416.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/help-data-suf ... 99856.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-denotes-th ... 94687.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/denotes-to-be ... 30841.html

Hope it helps.
Hello Bunuel
Thanks for the explanation. May I know WHY we don't consider x< 1 when we combined both statement?


(1) ----(-1)---------(1)-----
(2) ------------0------------

Overlep:
------(-1)----0----
User avatar
Farina
Joined: 21 Aug 2019
Last visit: 13 Oct 2020
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 352
Posts: 97
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPrepNow
macwanjason
If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?

(1) -1< x< 1
(2) x < 0

Target question: Is [x] = 0?
This is a good candidate for rephrasing the target question.

Given: [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x

Let's make sure we understand what this [] symbol means.
Here are a few examples:
[3.1] = 4
[5.8] = 6
[0.7] = 1
[-0.9] = 0
[0] = 0
[-4.6] = -4
[-1] = -1

We can see that [x] = 0, when -1 < x ≤ 0
So, we can REPHRASE the target question . . .

REPHRASED target question: Is -1 < x ≤ 0 ?

Aside: My video below has tips on rephrasing the target question

Statement 1: -1< x< 1
Let's TEST some values.
There are several values of x that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: x = -0.5. In this case, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, it IS the case that -1 < x ≤ 0
Case b: x = 0.5. In this case, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is NO, it is NOT the case that -1 < x ≤ 0
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x < 0
Let's TEST some values.
There are several values of x that satisfy statement 2. Here are two:
Case a: x = -0.5. In this case, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, it IS the case that -1 < x ≤ 0
Case b: x = -3. In this case, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is NO, it is NOT the case that -1 < x ≤ 0
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
When we combine the two statements, we get the inequality -1 < x < 0
So, for ALL possible values of x, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, it IS the case that < x ≤
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C

Cheers,
Brent

RELATED VIDEO FROM MY COURSE

If integer is mentioned why do we need to take floating point numbers and round them?
Plus you have written 3.1 = 4, I am sorry but I didnt understand this
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
36,438
 [1]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,438
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Farina

If integer is mentioned why do we need to take floating point numbers and round them?
Plus you have written 3.1 = 4, I am sorry but I didn't understand this

Given: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x

Let's examine [3.1]
There are infinitely many integers that are greater than or equal to 3.1. They include: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, .....
The bracket notation tells us to take the LEAST integer among the integers greater than or equal to 3.1.
So, [3.1] = 4

Notice that the question does not state that x must be an integer. All we know is that the OUTPUT will be an integer.

Does that help?
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,285
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,285
Kudos: 1,906
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Video solution from Quant Reasoning:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,846
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,846
Kudos: 9,180
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The least integer function takes any real number as the input; the output is the smallest integer greater than/equal to the number provided as the input.
For example, if x = 3.7, [x] = 4 since the smallest integer bigger than 3.7 is 4.

Strategy to solve least integer functions:

1) Plot the given value on the number line
2) The least integer for the given value will be the closest integer to the right, on the number line.

The original question stem, “Is [x] = 0?” can be rephrased as “Is -1<x≤0?”.

Statement I alone is insufficient to answer the question. Answer options A and D can be eliminated. Possible answer options are B, C or E

Statement II alone is insufficient to answer the question. Answer option B can be eliminated. Possible answer options are C or E.

Combining the data given in statements I and II, the common range is -1<x<0. This is sufficient to answer the question with a definite YES.
Statements I and II are sufficient when taken together. Answer option E can be eliminated.

The correct answer option is C.

Hope that helps!
Aravind B T
User avatar
GMATinsight
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,976
Own Kudos:
16,890
 [1]
Given Kudos: 128
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
Posts: 6,976
Kudos: 16,890
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
macwanjason
If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?

(1) -1< x< 1
(2) x < 0

Answer: Option C

Video solution by GMATinsight

 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
109729 posts
498 posts
210 posts