December 20, 2018 December 20, 2018 10:00 PM PST 11:00 PM PST This is the most inexpensive and attractive price in the market. Get the course now! December 22, 2018 December 22, 2018 07:00 AM PST 09:00 AM PST Attend this webinar to learn how to leverage Meaning and Logic to solve the most challenging Sentence Correction Questions.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 01 May 2012
Posts: 3

If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 May 2012, 04:34
Question Stats:
64% (01:14) correct 36% (01:12) wrong based on 2589 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0? (1) 1< x< 1 (2) x < 0
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 51301

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 May 2012, 00:53




Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 427
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Dec 2012, 00:03
When answering Data Sufficiency: (1) Find out the question. (2) Ponder about the possible values that will lead you to the answer. Solution: (1) Question: Is [x] = 0? (2) Possible values of x: [x] = 0 would mean x is greater than 1 but less than 0. Statement 1: 1 < x < 1 x=0.5 would give [x] = 1 x=0.5 would give [x] = 0 INSUFFICIENT. Statement 2: x < 0 x = 0.5 would give [x] = 0 x = 1 would give [x]=1 INSUFFICIENT Together: 1 < x < 0 This is the range of x that we know will give [x] = 0. SUFFICIENT. Answer: C
_________________
Impossible is nothing to God.




Intern
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 14

Re: If {x} denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 May 2012, 05:56
1) 1<x<1 if x=0.5; {x}=0; if x=0.5; {x}= 1 not sufficient 2)if x<0 itself not suficient, i.e cant be 0 or 1 or any negative int.
however 1) & 2) together are sufficient with 1<x<0 , {x}=0
therefore c



Intern
Joined: 24 May 2013
Posts: 5
GMAT Date: 06272013

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jun 2013, 11:53
I got the right answer but the question is tricky for me: "if [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x"... does it concern only numbers like [1.5]=2; [1.5]=1;... or [1.4] will also be rounded to 2?
Thank's



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 51301

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jun 2013, 11:57



Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2013
Posts: 51
Location: India

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Nov 2013, 23:31
Bunuel wrote: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?Some function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [1.5]=1, ... Question: is \([x]=0\)? > is \(1<x\leq{0}\)? (1) 1< x< 1. Not sufficient. (2) x < 0. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) 1<x<0. Sufficient. Answer: C. Similar questions to practice: howxbecomefractionifitsbeensaidaninteger94687.htmlawkwardds105416.htmlhelpdatasufficiencyequationandinequalities99856.htmlifdenotesthegreatestintegerlessthanorequaltox94687.htmldenotestobetheleastintegernolessthanxis130841.htmlHope it helps. Hi Bunuel, Can you post some 650+  700 level PS/DS questions on greatest integer function. Thanks!!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 51301

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Nov 2013, 23:42



Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2014
Posts: 10

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Apr 2014, 06:38
If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?
(1) 1< x< 1 [0.5] = 0 but [0.5] = 1. Not sufficient
(2) x < 0 [0.5] = 0 but [1] = 1 and [2] = 2. Not sufficient
(1)+(2) 1<x<0 [0.5] = 0. Sufficient
Answer: C.



Manager
Joined: 04 May 2015
Posts: 71
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
WE: Operations (Military & Defense)

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Oct 2015, 19:59
Hi everyone... This may sound strange but this is the first question I have ever come across [] to denote rounding up. I mistakenly treated it as  (absolute value) so obviously got the question wrong... Can I just confirm that this is a standard type of mathematical notation that is used on the GMAT? I have not seen this anywhere....
_________________
If you found my post useful, please consider throwing me a Kudos... Every bit helps



Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 12

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Apr 2016, 04:23
Bunuel wrote: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?Some function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [1.5]=1, ... Question: is \([x]=0\)? > is \(1<x\leq{0}\)? (1) 1< x< 1. Not sufficient. (2) x < 0. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) 1<x<0. Sufficient. Answer: C. Similar questions to practice: howxbecomefractionifitsbeensaidaninteger94687.htmlawkwardds105416.htmlhelpdatasufficiencyequationandinequalities99856.htmlifdenotesthegreatestintegerlessthanorequaltox94687.htmldenotestobetheleastintegernolessthanxis130841.htmlHope it helps. "[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x" i can see why this is rounding down but "If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x"i dont see how thisis rounding down and why "[x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x" why is this rounding up... i mean if theres only 2 of these i guess i could memorise but i'm trying to understand why... please help. Ive been stuck on this interpretation for ages i dont want to just memorise it.



CEO
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2631
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Apr 2016, 04:43
sabxu1 wrote: Bunuel wrote: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?Some function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [1.5]=1, ... Question: is \([x]=0\)? > is \(1<x\leq{0}\)? (1) 1< x< 1. Not sufficient. (2) x < 0. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) 1<x<0. Sufficient. Answer: C. Similar questions to practice: howxbecomefractionifitsbeensaidaninteger94687.htmlawkwardds105416.htmlhelpdatasufficiencyequationandinequalities99856.htmlifdenotesthegreatestintegerlessthanorequaltox94687.htmldenotestobetheleastintegernolessthanxis130841.htmlHope it helps. "[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x" i can see why this is rounding down but "If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x"i dont see how thisis rounding down and why "[x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x" why is this rounding up... i mean if theres only 2 of these i guess i could memorise but i'm trying to understand why... please help. Ive been stuck on this interpretation for ages i dont want to just memorise it. A quick comment. DO NOT memorize these definitions as they are not fixed. GMAT can change the definition of what the [x] does. Just try to understand what is the given definition.
Try to break it down in manageable chunks. Case 1: "If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x" > let x=4.4 what is the greatest integer LESS THAN or EQUAL to x ? Answer is 4 (5 will be GREATER THAN and NOT less than).You will get the equality when x = integer. Thus, based on the definition of [x] above, [4.4] = 4 (you rounded DOWN > you went to a lower number). Case 2: "[x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x" > let x =4.4 > based on this current definition, what is the LEAST integer GREATER or EQUAL to x? Answer is 5 (4 will not be correct here as 4<4.4). You will get the equality when x = integer. Thus, based on the definition of [x] above, [4.4] = 5 (you rounded UP > you went to a higher number). Do not memorize functional definitions as these definitions can change. Example, I can give you a question telling you that [x] denotes a function such that [x] =\(x^2\) etc. Hope this helps.



Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 12

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Apr 2016, 04:50
Engr2012 wrote: sabxu1 wrote: Bunuel wrote: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?Some function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [1.5]=1, ... Question: is \([x]=0\)? > is \(1<x\leq{0}\)? (1) 1< x< 1. Not sufficient. (2) x < 0. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) 1<x<0. Sufficient. Answer: C. Similar questions to practice: howxbecomefractionifitsbeensaidaninteger94687.htmlawkwardds105416.htmlhelpdatasufficiencyequationandinequalities99856.htmlifdenotesthegreatestintegerlessthanorequaltox94687.htmldenotestobetheleastintegernolessthanxis130841.htmlHope it helps. "[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x" i can see why this is rounding down but "If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x"i dont see how thisis rounding down and why "[x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x" why is this rounding up... i mean if theres only 2 of these i guess i could memorise but i'm trying to understand why... please help. Ive been stuck on this interpretation for ages i dont want to just memorise it. A quick comment. DO NOT memorize these definitions as they are not fixed. GMAT can change the definition of what the [x] does. Just try to understand what is the given definition.
Try to break it down in manageable chunks. Case 1: "If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x" > let x=4.4 what is the greatest integer LESS THAN or EQUAL to x ? Answer is 4 (5 will be GREATER THAN and NOT less than).You will get the equality when x = integer. Thus, based on the definition of [x] above, [4.4] = 4 (you rounded DOWN > you went to a lower number). Case 2: "[x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x" > let x =4.4 > based on this current definition, what is the LEAST integer GREATER or EQUAL to x? Answer is 5 (4 will not be correct here as 4<4.4). You will get the equality when x = integer. Thus, based on the definition of [x] above, [4.4] = 5 (you rounded UP > you went to a higher number). Do not memorize functional definitions as these definitions can change. Example, I can give you a question telling you that [x] denotes a function such that [x] =\(x^2\) etc. Hope this helps. Thanks for the explanation and time explain it to me. I thnk i understand it. I agree i should not memorise it. Thats why i was looking for an explanation.



Manager
Joined: 17 May 2015
Posts: 249

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Jan 2017, 05:26
Hi, Please note that greatest integer and least integer have two separate standard symbols, and GMAT is not going to use one symbol for another. Please refer the question no 111(DS) and 178(PS) OG 16th edition. Two symbols are as follows: \(\lceil x \rceil\): least integer greater than or equal to x. [x]: greatest integer less than or equal to x. Hope this helps.



SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1633
Location: United States
GPA: 3.64

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Jun 2017, 20:26
How to deal with such kind of gmat question in a general way?



Manager
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Posts: 146
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V25 GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.48

If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2017, 00:48
chesstitans wrote: How to deal with such kind of gmat question in a general way? Hi, I think the point here is to understand the phrase "the least integer greater than or equal to x". It means that if we have a number x, then just round it up to the possible smallest integer and we will get [x]. Remember that x could be anything, not just an integer. For example, if x=1.2, then [x]=1. Or if x=5, then [x]=5. This is a DS question. Then we read the information given in each statement and put it into number line to figure out whether we could answer the question. For example, (1) 1<x<1 Put 1 and 1 into the number line. We'll see that there are many situations to test. If 1<x=<0, then [x]=0. But that will not be necessarily the case, if 0<x<1. Because if 0<x<1, then [x]=1. Inconsistent answers mean insufficient statement.



Intern
Joined: 09 Jan 2017
Posts: 6

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2017, 08:36
Meaning of least value for positive values if x = 0.1 then also [x] = 1 if x=0.9 then also [x] = 1
For Negative values if x= 0.1 then also [x] = 0 if x=0.9 then also [x] = 0 statement 1 : given 1 <x < 1 so [x] can be 0 or 1; Not suffic.
statement 2 : given x <0 ;
so [x] can be 0 ,1,2 all the negative values.
Not suff.
so combining both together for getting the soltn.
We will get the answer C.



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 9200

Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jul 2018, 00:30
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources




Re: If [x] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to x &nbs
[#permalink]
21 Jul 2018, 00:30






