Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 08:15 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 08:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
kairoshan
Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Last visit: 14 May 2010
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
818
 [83]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 61
Kudos: 818
 [83]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
72
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
sriharimurthy
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2025
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
3,051
 [25]
Given Kudos: 18
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
Posts: 126
Kudos: 3,051
 [25]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
x2suresh
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Last visit: 18 Aug 2012
Posts: 715
Own Kudos:
3,139
 [9]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: New York
Posts: 715
Kudos: 3,139
 [9]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
shrouded1
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Last visit: 29 Apr 2018
Posts: 609
Own Kudos:
3,191
 [4]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
Products:
Posts: 609
Kudos: 3,191
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yeah, I think so. But there is no reason to take the special case of 4, it can be proven for a general k.

I had an alternate solution :

(1) & (2) are clearly not sufficient as k is arbitrary and can be large enough or small enough to force any condition on mean or median seperately

For (1) + (2) : Statement (2) implies y>k. Statement (1) implies x+y+z<3k. Now if you assume x+z=2y the above two inequalities are inconsistent ==> Contradiction ==> The answer to the question is always "No"

Hence (C)

short & sweet
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,420
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,420
Kudos: 778,541
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shrouded1
Yeah, I think so. But there is no reason to take the special case of 4, it can be proven for a general k.

I had an alternate solution :

(1) & (2) are clearly not sufficient as k is arbitrary and can be large enough or small enough to force any condition on mean or median seperately

For (1) + (2) : Statement (2) implies y>k. Statement (1) implies x+y+z<3k. Now if you assume x+z=2y the above two inequalities are inconsistent ==> Contradiction ==> The answer to the question is always "No"

Hence (C)

short & sweet

Yes you are right: as "4" in original question is purely arbitrary we can replace it with any other number or with unknown k as you did.

Question: is \(2y=x+z\)?

For (1): \(x+y+z<3k\);
For (2): \(k\) can not be the the largest term, thus it must be less than \(y\);

(1)+(2) As \(x+y+z<3k\) and \(k<y\) then \(2y=x+z\) can not be true. Sufficient.

Answer: C.
User avatar
ahsanmalik12
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Last visit: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 24
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(1)+(2) As x+y+z<3k and k<y then 2y=x+z can not be true.

Please elaborate on this...
thanks!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,420
Own Kudos:
778,541
 [3]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,420
Kudos: 778,541
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ahsanmalik12
(1)+(2) As x+y+z<3k and k<y then 2y=x+z can not be true.

Please elaborate on this...
thanks!

\(x+y+z<3k\) and \(k<y\), or \(3k<3y\) --> sum these two \(x+y+z+3k<3k+3y\) --> \(x+z<2y\), so \(x+z=2y\) is not true.
User avatar
TheMechanic
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Last visit: 05 Jul 2018
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
583
 [1]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.81
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The question essentially asks if the integers x,y and z are in progression (equally spaced) or not?

Stmt1: on solving we get, x+y+z<12. - clearly not sufficient.
Stmt2: considering a set is un-ordered, the middle numbers to consider for median can be 4,y or y,4. Therefore, (y+4)/2 < y.
This gives us y>4. The next integer which Y can be is 5, but it does not gives us anything about x and z. Hence Not Sufficient.

Combining, for x+y+z<12 , if Y=5 then Z=6, which gives us x<1. Clearly shows X,Y and Z are not going to be equally spaced out. Hence the answer 'C'
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
If x, y, and z are integers, and x < y < z, is z – y = y – x?

(1) The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}.
(2) The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.
Bunuel sriharimurthy chetan2u gmatbusters VeritasKarishma
My friend here has mentioned
sriharimurthy

The only set of values possible are x < ; y >= 5; z >= 6
More importantly, this tells us that x, y and z can never be equidistant from each other (which is a condition necessary for 2y = x + z). Thus the question stem will always be false.
Sufficient.

Answer : C

But if you look at it closely,
x, y and z can be equidistant, and in fact, consecutive. Makes me think that the option would be E.
I need some clarification. All explanations are appreciated!
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,709
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sharathnair14
Quote:
If x, y, and z are integers, and x < y < z, is z – y = y – x?

(1) The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}.
(2) The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.
Bunuel sriharimurthy chetan2u gmatbusters VeritasKarishma
My friend here has mentioned
sriharimurthy

The only set of values possible are x < ; y >= 5; z >= 6
More importantly, this tells us that x, y and z can never be equidistant from each other (which is a condition necessary for 2y = x + z). Thus the question stem will always be false.
Sufficient.

Answer : C

But if you look at it closely,
x, y and z can be equidistant, and in fact, consecutive. Makes me think that the option would be E.
I need some clarification. All explanations are appreciated!

Hi,

The answer will be C itself and x, y and z cannot be equally spaced..

If these were equally spaced, the addition of a new number will have SAME effect on the median and mean, either both will increase or both will decrease..
The median and mean if x, y , z are equally spaced will be y. Let the number be 0,5,10. Now three scenarios of the new number being added.
(1) If number is greater than y..... Both median and mean will increase... say 7, so 0, 5, 7, 10...Median = 6, Mean=5.5
(2) If number is equal to y....... Both will remain same, that is y.... say 5, so 0, 5, 5, 10...Median = 5, Mean=5
(3) If number is less than y..... Both median and mean will decrease.... say 4, so 0, 4, 5, 10...Median = 4.5, Mean=4.75

Thus, the statements given can never point towards equally spaced set x, y, z..

C
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,005
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kairoshan
If x, y, and z are integers, and x < y < z, is z – y = y – x?

(1) The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}.
(2) The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.

Given: x < y < z

Is z - y = y - x
Is y equidistant from z and x (in their middle)?
Is y the mean and median of {x, y, z}? (y will not be the mean if it is not in the centre of x and z)

(1) The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}.

This just tells us that if y is the mean, y < 4.
In any case, 4 is greater than the mean of set {x, y, z}.

(2) The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.

This just tells us that if y is the median of the set, y > 4.
In any case, 4 is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.

Using both statements together, we know that if y is the mean and median of {x, y, z} (if y is equidistant from both), then y must be less than 4 as well as greater than 4. That is not possible. So y would not be the mean and median.
Hence, z - y is not equal to y - x.

Answer (C)
User avatar
exc4libur
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Mar 2022
Posts: 1,684
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 607
Location: United States
Posts: 1,684
Kudos: 1,447
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kairoshan
If x, y, and z are integers, and x < y < z, is z – y = y – x?

(1) The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}.
(2) The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.

\((x,y,z)=integers…z-y=y-x…z+x=2y…y=(z+x)/2…y=avg(x,y)?\)

(1) The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}. insufic

\(\frac{x+y+z+4}{4}>\frac{x+y+z}{3}…x+y+z<12\)

(2) The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}. sufic

\(median(x,y,z,4)<median(x,y,z)=y\)
\(med(4,x,y,z)=(x+y/2)<y…x<y=valid…4<x<y<z\)
\(med(x,4,y,z)=(4+y/2)<y…4<y=valid…x≤4<y<z\)
\(med(x,y,z,4)=(y+z/2)<y…z<y=invalid\)

(1&2) sufic

\(x+y+z<12…x<y…(4<x<y<z)…x+y+z=5+6+7=18>12…invalid\)
\(x+y+z<12…4<y…(x≤4<y<z)…x+y+z=x+5+6<12…x<1…y≠avg(x,y)\)

Ans (C)
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,600
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,600
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105420 posts
496 posts