ashutosh_73 wrote:
Hi,
GMATNinja ,
KarishmaB ,
AjiteshArunIt was easy to eliminate rest of the options using ''
to thwart/for thwarting and introducing it/it was introduced'' split.
But i find it tough to choose (C) over (D):
Would ''comma before since'' in option (E) be the only deciding factory here OR am i missing something?
Also, i am confused about the verb-form in non-essential modifier. Is it that, because the
main-verb is in present-perfect the modifier too should be in present perfect?
(C) that has grown rampant in the southern United States since it was introduced in the 1920s to thwart
(E) growing rampantly in the southern United States, since it was introduced in the 1920s to thwart
Thanks
ASHUTOSH
Hi ashutosh_73,
Let's take a close look at all the issues in E.
BillyZ wrote:
(E) growing rampantly in the southern United States, since it was introduced in the 1920s to thwart
1. Growing rampantly: This isn't the best way to convey the intended meaning.
Has grown rampant means ~"has become very common", whereas
growing rampantly means ~"growing in an uncontrolled way".
Growing rampantly is a phrase I would use maybe for a specific plant or small area, not for the entire
southern United States. I can understand why many people wouldn't want to take this meaning call, but for the scale we are looking at in this sentence, I think
has grown rampant is the right choice. The present perfect
has grown rampant (
since) tells us that
Kudzu has achieved the state of being widespread.
2. The comma before
since: There are two problems here.
2a.
Since can mean either "because" or "from the time that". When
since means "from the time that", we may or may not see a comma before it. However, when
since means "because", we are much more likely to see a comma before it. This means that putting a comma before
since makes it harder for the reader to figure out which meaning we are aiming for.
2b. The other problem with the comma is that it makes it very difficult for the reader to identify what the
since is meant to refer to. Here's the sentence option E leads to:
Quote:
Kudzu, an Asian vine growing rampantly, since it was introduced in the 1920s, has overrun many houses
Notice that the modifier is now within a pair of commas between two different parts of the sentence. Are we trying to say that
the growing rampantly is what has been happening since the 1920s,
or are we saying that Kudzu has overrun many houses since the 1920s?
Compare this with what C gives us:
Quote:
Kudzu, an Asian vine that has grown rampant since it was introduced in the 1920s, has overrun many houses and countless acres of roadside
Option C makes it much easier for the reader to understand that the
since is for
has grown rampant.
Some of these calls are more reliable. Personally, I'd use (1) and (2b).