atalwar wrote:
egmat wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Thanks for an interesting discussion. I have added the official answer to the question. Let me know if anyone has any doubts.
Thanks,
Chiranjeev
Hi,
I know E is the best choice but only doubt is that however is premise indicator so conclusion after however will work? KaranT for the same question replied :
'When arguments have multiple conclusions, then one conclusion can act as premise for the other conclusion.
In the same way, if I am not wrong, the sentence following However is acting as counter premise as well as second conclusion'
So is KaranT correct? Please, highlight this.
Hi,
First of all, neither "however" is a premise indicator not it is compulsorily a counter-premise indicator.
Secondly, a statement cannot be the main conclusion and a counter-premise at the same time. Since the second BF is the main conclusion, it cannot be a counter-premise by definition.
A counter-premise is something which opposes the main conclusion. So, a statement cannot be counter-premise and main conclusion at the same time.
Now the most important thing regarding your question - you are saying that since a particular rule (however is a premise or counter premise indicator and is a part of BF2) doesn't apply to BF2, you cannot call it the main conclusion. This is inspite the fact that you feel that option E is correct and BF2 is the main conclusion.
So, here's one very important learning for you: Logic trumps every such rule. Logic is the most important thing. Given that we are dealing with English language, we cannot be certain that particular words can only be used in one way and not the other. So, even though, such rules may apply in majority of the cases, these rules are not universal. Therefore, if you feel that logic says something and the rule says something else, then always go by the logic.
Hope this helps
-Chiranjeev