Evidence used by Critics:At Achievers’ School, students from economically underprivileged backgrounds, who study free of charge under the company’s social responsibility clause, tend to spend less-time in school than the financially well-to-do, fee paying students. This is despite the fact that on average, economically underprivileged children have more pressing academic needs than the fee paying-students
Conclusion of Critics: the economically underprivileged students are not receiving proper academic attention (BF1)
Evidence used by Admin. officer: Careful investigation has recently shown two things: students from financially well to do households hang around in school premises to discuss their after-school parties, and tend to stay back in the school after classes to attend such optional sports activities that have nothing to do with a student’s academic development.
Conclusion of Admin. Officer: this conclusion is almost certainly baseless (BF-2)
Relation btw BF-1 and BF-2
BF-1 is the conclusion of Critics, whereas BF-2 is the conclusion of Admin. Off (the main conclusion of argument).
Here, BF-2 challenges BF-1.
A. The first states the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument
(the first is the conclusion of Critics); the second provides support for that conclusion
(the second challenges the first).
B. The first is used to support the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument
(don’t support the Admin. Officer’s conclusion) ; the second states that conclusion.
C. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by school critics
(the first is the conclusion itself); the second states the position that the administrative officer’s argument opposes
(the second is the admin. Officer’s position).
D. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by school critics
(the first is the conclusion itself); the second provides support for the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument
(the second itself is the Admin. Officer conclusion).
E. The first states the position that the administrative officer’s argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument.
CORRECT