anuj88 wrote:
Danica Patrick is a notable racer on the Indy circuit, which once again shows that women can compete with men.
(A) which once again shows that women can compete with men
(B) which once again shows that women are able to complete with men
(C) a fact which once again shows that women can compete with men
(D) showing once again that women can compete with men
(E) proof once again that women can compete with men
Am confused between option C & D
Disagreement is a word that suits this question
and it creates such things quite a lot
Firstly let me get to the meaning : a particular gender does something noticeable, which shows that one particular gender can compete with other
I feel a clear situation is there for a cause and effect, hence D seems right
C is wordy with use of word *a fact* basically it's not used as fact in very literal meaning
use of
a fact which once again
shows that women can compete with men
here the use of relative modifier is somewhat problematic, which is used to describe non-essential info and precedes by comma
(use of that in place of which can make it better)Again it's too much stretched to use two times relative modifier in this case, D filters out this thing in better way.