Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 19:53 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 19:53

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Mar 2018
Posts: 264
Own Kudos [?]: 346 [0]
Given Kudos: 271
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37 (Online)
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Posts: 474
Own Kudos [?]: 342 [3]
Given Kudos: 28
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2019
Posts: 69
Own Kudos [?]: 104 [0]
Given Kudos: 142
Location: Azerbaijan
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Send PM
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 1378
Own Kudos [?]: 846 [0]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
Quote:
Indeed, leaders were supposed to be called to office rather than to run for office. And if they took up the burdens of public office with a sense of duty, leaders also believed that such offices were naturally their due because of their social preeminence or their contributions to the country.

Query1: is the meaning called to office right?
called to office means: took up the burdens of public office with a sense of duty ?
run for office: means to campaign to be elected to an office?

Query2:So does it mean that there were no elections before during first 6 presidents? How could people elect president unless leaders of parties run to office?
or , it is just to imply that whoever was elected would called to office in his sense of duty.

please confirm.
(GMATNinja, mikemcgarry, MagooshExpert (Carolyn), ccooley, GMATGuruNY, EducationAisle, generis workout, Gnpth: Anyone please.
Thanks!)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 50
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
shivarora306 wrote:
JarvisR wrote:
Time taken 13 mins. Is it bad? <Updated time:10 mins>
1. The passage is primarily concerned with
B. describing and analyzing an argument about the early history of the United States
Argument first descibes the era of earlier leadership (first 6 presidents) .
From second para, it introduces the changes in the system since the era of later Presidents.Finally, it mentions it views on the pros and cons of both the eras.

2. According to the passage, the author and Ketcham agree on which of the following points?
A. The first six Presidents held the same ideas about political parties as did later Presidents in the United States.
B. Classical ideals supported the growth of commercial forces in the United States.
C. The first political parties in the United States were formed during Van Buren's term in office.
D. The first six Presidents placed great emphasis on individualism and civil rights.
E. Widespread acceptance of political parties occurred during Andrew Jackson's presidency.
>> For me it was between C &E. C is wrong bec arg says that Party found legal status but that doesn't mean they weren't formed before that.

3. It can be inferred that the author of the passage would be most likely to agree that modern views of the freedoms of speech and press are
D. values not inherent in the classical humanist tradition of eighteenth-century England
"the classical conception of leadership was incompatible with our modern notion of the freedoms of speech and press, freedoms intimately associated with the legitimacy of opposing political parties."

4. Which of the following, if true, provides the LEAST support for the author's argument about commerce and political parties during Jackson's presidency?
A. Many supporters of Jackson resisted the commercialization that could result from participation in a national economy.
"he does rightly see Jackson's tenure (the seventh presidency) as the culmination of the acceptance of party, commerce, and individualism. For the Jacksonians, nonpartisanship lost its relevance, "

5. The author of the passage would most likely to agree with which of following statements about Ketcham?
C. He does not pay adequate attention to the negative aspects of the first Presidents’ commitment to classical ideals.
"Ketcham is so strongly committed to justifying the classical ideals, however, that he underestimates the advantages of their decline. "





In question 5: the option C talks about the "negative aspects of the first Presidents’ commitment to classical ideals", whereas the passage talks about the advantages of the decline.
The passage did not mention about the negative aspects of the first president's commitment to classical ideas, and definitely not related to Ketcham.

Please let me know if I missed something.

Thanks !
Shivam


Hi GMATNinja ,

I have the same question here. "He underestimates the advantages of their decline" and "he does not pay adequate attention to the negative aspects" sound like two different things. Could you please help explain why (C) is the correct answer?

Thanks!
Pruek
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Posts: 790
Own Kudos [?]: 683 [1]
Given Kudos: 1316
Location: India
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
1
Kudos
pruekv wrote:
shivarora306 wrote:
JarvisR wrote:
Time taken 13 mins. Is it bad? <Updated time:10 mins>
1. The passage is primarily concerned with
B. describing and analyzing an argument about the early history of the United States
Argument first descibes the era of earlier leadership (first 6 presidents) .
From second para, it introduces the changes in the system since the era of later Presidents.Finally, it mentions it views on the pros and cons of both the eras.

2. According to the passage, the author and Ketcham agree on which of the following points?
A. The first six Presidents held the same ideas about political parties as did later Presidents in the United States.
B. Classical ideals supported the growth of commercial forces in the United States.
C. The first political parties in the United States were formed during Van Buren's term in office.
D. The first six Presidents placed great emphasis on individualism and civil rights.
E. Widespread acceptance of political parties occurred during Andrew Jackson's presidency.
>> For me it was between C &E. C is wrong bec arg says that Party found legal status but that doesn't mean they weren't formed before that.

3. It can be inferred that the author of the passage would be most likely to agree that modern views of the freedoms of speech and press are
D. values not inherent in the classical humanist tradition of eighteenth-century England
"the classical conception of leadership was incompatible with our modern notion of the freedoms of speech and press, freedoms intimately associated with the legitimacy of opposing political parties."

4. Which of the following, if true, provides the LEAST support for the author's argument about commerce and political parties during Jackson's presidency?
A. Many supporters of Jackson resisted the commercialization that could result from participation in a national economy.
"he does rightly see Jackson's tenure (the seventh presidency) as the culmination of the acceptance of party, commerce, and individualism. For the Jacksonians, nonpartisanship lost its relevance, "

5. The author of the passage would most likely to agree with which of following statements about Ketcham?
C. He does not pay adequate attention to the negative aspects of the first Presidents’ commitment to classical ideals.
"Ketcham is so strongly committed to justifying the classical ideals, however, that he underestimates the advantages of their decline. "





In question 5: the option C talks about the "negative aspects of the first Presidents’ commitment to classical ideals", whereas the passage talks about the advantages of the decline.
The passage did not mention about the negative aspects of the first president's commitment to classical ideas, and definitely not related to Ketcham.

Please let me know if I missed something.

Thanks !
Shivam


Hi GMATNinja ,

I have the same question here. "He underestimates the advantages of their decline" and "he does not pay adequate attention to the negative aspects" sound like two different things. Could you please help explain why (C) is the correct answer?

Thanks!
Pruek


Hi pruekv,

Option C can be directly inferred from : "Ketcham is so strongly committed to justifying the classical ideals, however, that he underestimates the advantages of their decline. For example, the classical conception of leadership was incompatible with our modern notion of the freedoms of speech and press, freedoms intimately associated with the legitimacy of opposing political parties."

The above lines imply that Ketcham is so strongly focussed in justifying the classical ideals, that he neglected as to why those ideals declined and underestimated the advantages of decline and that is exactly what option C says.
So to answer your question "He underestimates the advantages of their decline" and "he does not pay adequate attention to the negative aspects" imply that same thing that Ketcham didn't pay much attention to why classical ideals that first Presidents’ were so committed to declined. The negative aspect in discussion is : classical conception of leadership was incompatible with the modern notion of the freedoms of speech and press.


Let me know if you still have issues.
Thanks.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 50
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
Got it! Thank you bm2201!

Best Regards,
pruekv
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Oct 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
For Question #5: Why is E incorrect?

The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about Ketcham?

A. He overemphasizes the influence of classical ideals on the first six Presidents of the United States.

B. He fails to recognize that classical ideals had little influence on politics in the United States.

C. He does not pay adequate attention to the negative aspects of the first six Presidents' commitment to classical ideals.

D. He inaccurately suggests that classical ideals gave rise to our modern notion of democracy.

E. He underestimates the effect of ideologies other than the humanist tradition on the first six Presidents.

WHY IS E INCORRECT?
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Posts: 790
Own Kudos [?]: 683 [1]
Given Kudos: 1316
Location: India
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
1
Kudos
roastedcoco wrote:
For Question #5: Why is E incorrect?

The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about Ketcham?

A. He overemphasizes the influence of classical ideals on the first six Presidents of the United States.

B. He fails to recognize that classical ideals had little influence on politics in the United States.

C. He does not pay adequate attention to the negative aspects of the first six Presidents' commitment to classical ideals.

D. He inaccurately suggests that classical ideals gave rise to our modern notion of democracy.

E. He underestimates the effect of ideologies other than the humanist tradition on the first six Presidents.

WHY IS E INCORRECT?


Hi roastedcoco,

E for Question 5 is incorrect, because throughout the passage, author mostly discusses the classical ideologies held by the first six Presidents and Ketcham so strongly committed to justifying those ideals, that he that he neglected as to why those ideals declined and underestimated the advantages of decline. Author nowhere mentions that Ketcham underestimates the effect of ideologies other than the humanist tradition.


Hope This Helps.
Thanks.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2020
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
vishu48 wrote:
HasnainAfxal wrote:
New Question from the passage.

Which of the following best describes the attitude of the first six Presidents toward political parties as it is discussed in the passage?

A) Political parties were essential to the notions of democracy on which the United States government was based.

B) Personal character in leadership was as important as affiliation with a political party.

C) Political parties were one way to ensure that government could meet the needs of all citizens.

D) Political parties, though undesirable, were inevitable in a democratic political system.

E) Political parties represented opposing political interests rather than the general public good.






The attitude embraced by first 6 is classical leadership and believing in public good than Private Interests and Individualism.

My Guess is "E"

Anyone ?


Yes, I think so!
Such topics are always very controversial. But I always tend to believe in the public good and position it above individualism too.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Apr 2020
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 56
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
vishu48 wrote:
HasnainAfxal wrote:
New Question from the passage.

Which of the following best describes the attitude of the first six Presidents toward political parties as it is discussed in the passage?

A) Political parties were essential to the notions of democracy on which the United States government was based.

B) Personal character in leadership was as important as affiliation with a political party.

C) Political parties were one way to ensure that government could meet the needs of all citizens.

D) Political parties, though undesirable, were inevitable in a democratic political system.

E) Political parties represented opposing political interests rather than the general public good.




The attitude embraced by first 6 is classical leadership and believing in public good than Private Interests and Individualism.

My Guess is "E"

Anyone ?



Yes its is E . The Reasoning is mention in the last line of paragraph 1.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Sep 2019
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
GMATNinja could you please explain how to go about answering question 4?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63669 [2]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Luciano wrote:
GMATNinja could you please explain how to go about answering question 4?

Question 4


Quote:
4. Which of the following, if true, provides the LEAST support for the author's argument about commerce and political parties during Jackson's presidency?

To answer question 4, we need to understand the author's argument about commerce and political parties during Jackson's presidency.

In the paragraph 1, we learn that, according to a historian named Ketcham, the first six presidents condemned political parties. The early presidents hated parties so much because they held a "classical conception of virtuous leadership," and thought that party politics prevent leaders from selflessly embodying this ideal.

Then Jackson comes along as president #7, and this is what the author says about his presidency:

    "[Ketcham] does rightly see Jackson's tenure (the seventh presidency) as the culmination of the acceptance of party, commerce, and individualism. For the Jacksonians, nonpartisanship lost its relevance, and under the direction of Van Buren, party gained a new legitimacy."


So, the author argues that there is a contrast between the first six presidents (under whom party politics were discouraged), and Jackson (under whom political parties and commerce were accepted).

In answering the question, we're looking for a piece of information that DOES NOT support this argument. Let's go through the answer choices:
Quote:
(A) Many supporters of Jackson resisted the commercialization that could result from participation in a national economy.

(A) tells us that Jackson supporters RESISTED commercialization. That goes completely against the author's claim that, under Jackson, commerce became ACCEPTED.

(A) doesn't support the author's argument, so keep it for now.

Quote:
(B) Protest against the corrupt and partisan nature of political parties in the United States subsided during Jackson's presidency.

If protest against political parties subsided, it seems like people grew more favorable toward political parties. This supports the claim that political parties were more accepted during Jackson's presidency.

Because (B) supports the author's claim, we can eliminate it.

Quote:
(C) During Jackson's presidency the use of money became more common than bartering of goods and services.

From (C), we can gather that commercial activity was on the rise during Jackson's presidency. This supports the author's claim that commerce became more accepted during this time.

(C) is out.

Quote:
(D) More northerners than southerners supported Jackson because southerners were opposed to the development of a commercial economy.

This tells us a bit more about Jackson's supporters -- they were northerners who were more open to the idea of developing a commercial economy. This supports the author's claim that Jacksonianism and commercialism go hand-in-hand.

(D) supports the author's argument, so get rid of (D).

Quote:
(E) Andrew Jackson did not feel as strongly committed to the classical ideals of leadership as George Washington had felt.

This supports the author's claim that, under Jackson, there was a shift away from classical ideals of leadership and toward commerce/political parties.

Eliminate (E).

(A) is the correct answer to question #4.

I hope that helps!
Retired Moderator
Joined: 31 May 2017
Posts: 749
Own Kudos [?]: 670 [0]
Given Kudos: 53
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
Took me around 11 minutes to complete the passage and got all of them correct, but got a question wrong during mock test.

My Notes:
P1
RK Argues in his new book --> First 6 Pres - Humanist ideals
What is humanist ? classical leadership model -> They condemned political parties

Author explains RK's views about first 6 pres and how they differed from later one's

P2
Even during 1st presidency the commercial forces started undermining classical - Commerce
Commerce started atleast during 8th century

RK --> did not think about this conflict existing earlier, but says all started more during 7th presidency.
Jackson started the decline of non partisan and van bueron recognised party
According to them classical ideal is privilage.
Author critices RK - RK did not see the disadvantages of decline of classicial ideals and states examples.
Current Student
Joined: 18 Dec 2020
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 66 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Location: Canada
Concentration: Healthcare, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V41
GPA: 2.8
WE:Project Management (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Out of curiosity, where does this rank in terms of difficulty on the GMAT? 6-700?

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 May 2020
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
Is this a 700 level question?
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32919 [0]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
Expert Reply
sparshdhamija wrote:
Is this a 700 level question?


The difficulty level of this passage should be as such in my opinion:

Question #1: 650
Question #2: 600
Question #3: 600
Question #4: 650-700
Question #5: 650
Question #6: 550

Overall: 600-650
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 May 2021
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Indonesia
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
can anyone explain more about this meaning?

Towards the end of the first paragraph, we have " the first six Presidents condemned political parties. Parties were partial by definition, self-interested, and therefore serving something other than the transcendent public good."

(E). Political parties represented opposing political interests rather than the general public good.

opposing means the political parties do not support the political interests, instead, they support the general public good? since in the text, it says that political parties support the political interest rather than the public good.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Posts: 84
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 131
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
Can someone please explain Q5?

GMATNinja
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Posts: 84
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 131
Send PM
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
GMATNinja wrote:
asthagupta wrote:
Could someone please tell why option A is incorrect for first question?

Quote:
Q1 The passage is primarily concerned with
(A) describing and comparing two theories about the early history of the United States
(B) describing and analyzing an argument about the early history of the United States
(C) discussing new evidence that qualifies a theory about the early history of the United States
(D) refuting a theory about political leadership in the United States
(E) resolving an ambiguity in an argument about political leadership in the United States

The passage does discuss two different types of leadership: the classical conception of leadership (embraced by the first 6 presidents) and the party system (embraced by Jacksonians), but it does not discuss two theories about the early history of the United States. Instead the passage only discusses Ralph Ketcham's argument ("that the first six Presidents differed decisively from later Presidents because the first six held values inherited from the classical humanist tradition of eighteenth-century England"). The author of the passage describes and analyzes Ketcham's view, pointing out the argument's strengths and weaknesses.

Thus, choice (B) is a better answer.



C) Qualifies a claim means limiting the scope. So, here the author disagrees about certain aspects of Ketcham's theory. Do we call that as qualifies the claim or
D) Can you explain why this answer choice i s wrong?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leade [#permalink]
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne