Last visit was: 10 Jul 2025, 13:04 It is currently 10 Jul 2025, 13:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,147
Own Kudos:
21,909
 [27]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
27
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,147
Own Kudos:
21,909
 [7]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
sobby
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Last visit: 24 Jan 2022
Posts: 445
Own Kudos:
383
 [1]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 445
Kudos: 383
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,443
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,443
Kudos: 1,438
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ziyuen

TRICKY


Radar detectors are devices that sense the nearby use of a radar gun, and, in doing so, alert drivers to the presence of police officers who might catch drivers for speeding. But evidence shows that drivers who have radar detectors in their cars are actually 10% more likely to receive speeding tickets than those who do not have radar detectors. Drivers should therefore save the money they would spend on radar detectors and simply pay the tickets they’re going to receive whether they use a radar detector or not.

Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the argument above?

A. Several highway patrol agencies have begun developing strategies to target drivers who use radar detectors.
B. Only the drivers most likely to receive speeding tickets purchase and use radar detectors.
C. Radar detectors only cost a fraction of the expense that drivers spend on the purchase and maintenance of their vehicles.
D. Radar detectors do not help drivers avoid other types of tickets, such as those for failure to fully stop at a stop light.
E. Mobile phone companies have recently developed apps that will alert drivers to the presence of police officers along their route.


Hi ziyuen,

I actually reached the solution by eliminating all other possible answers as they strengthen conclusion. However, I still skeptical about explanation answer B. Let's make GMATNinja shares hos thoughts.
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,443
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,443
Kudos: 1,438
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Charles,

The official answer provided by Veritas is not convincing for me to weaken the argument. It assumes that those drivers will get twice or 3 times tickets. I think that it is huge assumption that may or may not be true.

Can you please share your thoughts.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 July 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,495
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,964
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,495
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yeah, the question-writers were clearly trying to copy an LSAT question here. It's somewhere in LSAT PrepTests #29-38, I think -- but in any case, they didn't do a great job on the execution. Again, it's brutally, brutally hard for even the best test-prep companies to copy the style of actual tests. The GMAT spends $1500-$3000 developing each individual question, and I have reason to suspect that the figure is even higher for the LSAT.

So this isn't a criticism of the question-writers, since they're trying to accomplish the impossible... but fwiw, here's where they lost me:

Quote:
In this prompt, the conclusion can be tricky to properly identify because it has two parts to it: “save the money they would spend on radar detectors” and “simply pay the tickets.” The conclusion is essentially saying “radar detectors don’t help drivers avoid tickets,” based on the statistic that radar detector owners get 10% more tickets than those who don’t.

No, that's not really what the conclusion is saying. Here's the conclusion of the passage:

Quote:
Drivers should therefore save the money they would spend on radar detectors and simply pay the tickets they’re going to receive whether they use a radar detector or not.

Now, that's a completely different animal. In writing the explanation, they're committing a cardinal sin of CR: changing the language of the conclusion so that it says something subtly different. Actually, this isn't even subtle: the explanation changes the conclusion pretty radically. As GMATNinjaTwo likes to say, whoever wrote the explanation is "putting words in the passage's mouth" -- and that's a huge error when you're doing CR.

(B) might be the best of the bunch, but it's still a pretty lousy answer. So don't worry too much about this one.
User avatar
RMD007
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Last visit: 08 Jun 2019
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
186
 [2]
Given Kudos: 80
Status:Countdown Begins...
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
Posts: 236
Kudos: 186
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Agree with GMATNinja, while option B seems to be the possible choice but it is debatable, also OE is not crystal clear.

GMATNinja bb, these days I see quite a few problems especially in SC and CR which actually in a way are not logically sound. Sometimes, these questions end up creating confusions for many people(beginners like me:P).

Can we have some flag associated with each question in which forum moderators can update the quality of the problem? Say something like "Trusted by experts" (Don't know if this is appropriate, but something of this sort). At the moment we only have the difficulty level of the problem which is determined by the answers given by users.
This will help users not to worry about their wrong answers in flawed or debatable questions.
User avatar
Divijakanneganty
Joined: 05 Jun 2020
Last visit: 13 Aug 2024
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 78
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
GMAT 2: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 640 Q48 V29
Posts: 40
Kudos: 5
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Assumptions :
1. Radar detectors have no other purposes that can save money for the user but to detect radar guns. Drivers install the RD only to avoid radio guns and thereby fines consequently.
2. Drivers who installed RD are not the ones who frequently exceed the speed limits and end up paying more fines.

By weakening any one of the assumptions we can arrive at the weakener.

A. Several highway patrol agencies have begun developing strategies to target drivers who use radar detectors.
Irrelevant
B. Only the drivers most likely to receive speeding tickets purchase and use radar detectors.
Weakens the 2nd assumption
C. Radar detectors only cost a fraction of the expense that drivers spend on the purchase and maintenance of their vehicles.
Doesn't weaken the argument
D. Radar detectors do not help drivers avoid other types of tickets, such as those for failure to fully stop at a stop light.
Other types are out of scope
E. Mobile phone companies have recently developed apps that will alert drivers to the presence of police officers along their route.[/quote] Further strengthening the conclusion by providing alternate source
User avatar
Vibhatu
Joined: 18 May 2021
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 178
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 186
Posts: 178
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
apart from B , we can eliminate all choices easily ..

But overall this is not a good question. 10% more likely to receive speeding tickets, means you have more chance to receive than anyone.
It does not men if those drivers were actually “supposed to” get twice or three times as many tickets.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts